The Democrat Media Left Built This, They Must Own It

The Democrat Media Left Built This, They Must Own It

The Democrat Media Left Built This, They Must Own It

Yes, it would be wonderful if politics were truly put aside after this. I even posted as such last night. However, it’s obvious by the headlines and reactions from political pundits and members of the media that this assassination attempt on President Trump is supposed to be treated as HIS fault, not anyone else’s.

No. They need to OWN this. But they are so embedded in ORANGE MAN BAD that weaselly headlines were issued. There’s quite a compilation of those headlines at this link.  

So-called journalists lectured President Trump, and some politicians were deeply saddened that he wasn’t killed. This is the New York Times headline on its front page this morning. 

The Denver Post went even further. 

The subhead line isn’t any better: “shooting considered assassination attempt; spectator killed, two hurt. WOW guys. Just WOW. 

Keep in mind, the media told us that Kathy Griffin’s holding up a bloody severed head of Trump was just “art.” Chuck Schumer screaming about Supreme Court justices reaping the whirlwind was just over-the-top dramatics. Joe Biden, who showed up last night for barely two minutes, demonized American voters at his heinous Philadelphia speech and consistently since was just politics don’t you know. Steve Scalise getting shot by a crazed Bernie Bro and Rand Paul getting beat up by his neighbor isn’t anyone’s fault but their own. That’s according to the Democrat left. 

We aren’t supposed to point out how the rhetoric from the Democrats has contributed to the animus percolating across this country. 

Democratic Colorado state Rep. Steven Woodrow had no “sympathy” for former president Donald Trump after he was shot in the ear in an apparent assassination attempt.

“The last thing America needed was sympathy for the devil but here we are,” Woodrow posted on X after the shooting that killed one and left two others in critical condition.

Woodrow couldn’t even bring himself to just say that Trump getting shot is wrong period. Instead, he sent that out. And then, after deleting his entire account, CO State Rep. Steven Woodrow issued this statement:

“I condemn this act of violence on the strongest terms,” Woodrow told the Washington Examiner. “As much as I believe Trump is not the right choice, we cannot resort to violence. Ever. We must engage peacefully and win at the ballot box.”

He explained that his point, which was “poorly articulated,” was that the attack “risks portraying Trump a martyr, thus making him more likely to win in November.”

“I’m glad he wasn’t seriously injured and pray for his family and for the future of America,” Woodrow added.

Woodrow can backpedal all he wants, but he truly did mean what he said with his initial tweet. The media is just HOPING, WISHING, and PRAYING for retaliation from conservatives. 

What’s also telling is how some in the Biden Administration are responding to this assassination attempt. 

The dangerous rhetoric is coming from the left. The media and Democrats can peddle gaslight all they want in the next few days, but THEY built this. Remember this from Mike Godwin at The Washington Post just last December? 

Yes, it’s okay to compare Trump to Hitler. Don’t let me stop you.

~Snip

But when people draw parallels between Donald Trump’s 2024 candidacy and Hitler’s progression from fringe figure to Great Dictator, we aren’t joking. Those of us who hope to preserve our democratic institutions need to underscore the resemblance before we enter the twilight of American democracy.

Just the other day The New Republic went viral for their gleeful publishing of a major article showing Trump as Hitler and claiming he will bring into being American fascism. 

Have they issued any statements about this assassination attempt? NOPE. But they will be the first to tell us that it is the conservatives who are guilty of dangerous rhetoric. This is whom the Democrat media left has created. 

Joe Biden is continuously on record yelling about “MAGA extremism” and has denigrated Trump and Trump supporters on a multitude of occasions.

He built this, he and everyone around him need to own their role in this. 

I and the rest of us at Victory Girls are beyond thankful that President Trump was not killed last night. 

His family is as well. Melania’s statement was powerful and will resonate for a very long time. 

The Democrat media left bears responsibility for the divisive rhetoric that abounds. Will they own up to it and make changes? It’s looking quite obvious that no lessons have been learned. 

Welcome Instapundit Readers!

Feature Photo Credit: video screenshot of live event via media and AP specifically, editorial use only, cropped and modified

Written by

23 Comments
  • Kevin says:

    “The Democrat media left bears responsibility for the divisive rhetoric that abounds. Will they own up to it and make changes? It’s looking quite obvious that no lessons have been learned.”

    Victory Girls is radioactive and toxic. Here’s where politics stumbles … You (the “universal” you) have no control over what others say, the media, politicians, or anyone else. What you do have control over is your words and clearly you have failed the sniff test.

    The president of The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank, said the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling is encouraging and that the group, known for Project 2025, is already in the process of “taking the country back.” “We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be,” Kevin Roberts said in an interview on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast on Tuesday. Did you drop an email to Steve Bannon or Kevin Roberts asking them to lessen the rhetoric? Did you write a blog post condemning the rhetoric? If not, then you’re just as much part of the problem as “the left media” as you claim. Sadly, you’ll never see it and the conservative movement will continue to stoke violence. Bannon, Onan, Carlson, Hannity, Flynn, Giuliani … the list is exhaustive. And you’re blaming the liberal media?

    There is nothing anyone is going to say because you’re so enmeshed in a cult. Did you speak out about election workers being threatened? What about people serving in the judicial system? The list is endless … yet you’ve never said a word; only stoked the flames.

    The fires will continue to rage until you and your cohorts accept responsibility for your behavior.

    • Cameron says:

      You and your kind have been spitting invective against us since Trump announced his candidacy. Take responsibility for once in your life.

      And even though Project 2025 isn’t endorsed by Trump, the fact whiny little gay men like you are quivering in fear about it tells me that the ideas aren’t that bad.

    • Turtler says:

      Oh joy. Just who I did not want to see coming back to VGB after my sabbatical. Let it not be said I did not give you a chance, Fascist Goon. I read through your post, HOPING you had obtained some basic humanity or ethics since I last encountered you (even if it was something you had to stole).

      No such luck. So time for me to fisk Discount Roehm again.

      “Victory Girls is radioactive and toxic.”

      NOBODY SANE BELIEVES YOU, Comrade Roehm. And do you know why?

      Because you know what people ACTUALLY do when it comes to things or places that are “radioactive and toxic”? THEY AVOID THEM. Indeed, even the corrupt, Krokodil-addled Contractnikiand Hookers-n-Blow obsessed Generaldom of the Russian Federation knew enough to get the heck out of the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (they may not have known enough to AVOID GOING THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE or to not DIG UP THE HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE TOPSOIL, but at least eventually they learned). Even the absolute brainlets that are the Southeastern Taliban and the Naxalites (your soulmates) steer clear from the fallout of the Bhopal Disaster. I myself limit contact between myself and scum like DU.

      AND YET, HERE YOU ARE LURKING AT THE PLACE YOU CLAIM IS “TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE”. Blood libeling us out the wazoo and claiming to be oh so prosecuted by “Fascists” (while resembling Fascists far more than we are), perfectly comfortable that the most that can happen to you is being banned on here.

      You are the VERY EMBODIMENT of what this post talks about. I would know. I’ve dealt with you before.

      “Here’s where politics stumbles … You (the “universal” you) have no control over what others say, the media, politicians, or anyone else.”

      This is what we call gaslighting bullshit. But anybody that claims we have “no control over what others say” is ignoring the fact that people have various means to incentivize or penalize what others say. For instance, on the lower end I can point out how you are being a piece of trash with a striking resemblance to another thuggish, fascistic goon obsessed with his own sexual orientation were it not for Roehm actually knowing half a damn about academic fields and .had the courage to be a Shocktrooper both in the trenches of the Western Front and the fields. This won’t accomplish much more than helping to shine a light in a fine dissection of your dishonesty, illogic, hypocrisy, and totalitarian leanings, but it will help others pile in.

      There is also endorsing those that message as we find appropriate or punishing those we do by deciding who we give attention or focus to. How’s Bud Light going lately? Or the numerous scumbags who got fired because they were dumb enough to reveal unethical and/or unprofessional conduct?

      And then of course there is shining the light of vigilance groups and if need be the State (feel free to insert your mantra of worship to it, “Peace Be Upon It” or somewhat, here) if there is particularly galling things like cheerleading for political violence. Like the number of people that a humiliated Secret Service are going to be visiting because they were dumb enough to publicly advertise how they wished Trump were actually murdered (which I note you fit well into).

      So tell me, Kevin: where were you when Leftist Elected Officials talked gleefully about how Trump was a threat to “our Democracy”, A Fascist, how you and your ilk should get up in their faces, or even about punching them? Where is the registering of your discontent with that?

      “What you do have control over is your words and clearly you have failed the sniff test.”

      ACCORDING TO WHOM, YOU FASCIST GOON?!?! Who ADMINISTERED The Sniff Test? YOU? You have absolutely no credibility in doing so.

      “The president of The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank, said the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling is encouraging and that the group, known for Project 2025, is already in the process of “taking the country back.””

      No words of Bullseyes or Demonization there. In contrast to you.

      ” “We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be,” Kevin Roberts said in an interview on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast on Tuesday.”

      This is not the own you think it is, you historically illiterate mofo. The First American Revolution lasted something like 20-26 years between 1760 (or thereabouts) and 1783.

      To those of you who can do math on a grade school level or who know their history (both of which sadly exclude Kevin the Discount Roehm, who shows how he is once again a sad, pale imitation of his spiritual mentor the Classically Educated Scholar-Socialist-Serial Killing Monster), you’ll notice something:

      WAR DID NOT BREAK OUT UNTIL MORE THAN HALFWAY THROUGH THAT PERIOD, in 1775. And when it did, it broke out because of thuggishness and the violation of rights by the British Parliament and Crown by dint of their military occupation in New England extending to weapon confiscation.

      The VAST MAJORITY OF THE REST OF THIS PERIOD, 1760ish-1775, was spent with the Founders seeking PEACEFUL REDRESS OF THEIR GRIEVANCES WITH THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT, past things such as the Intolerable Acts, the start of military occupation in Boston, the Boston Massacre, the first waves of media censorship and weapon confiscations, and so on. They wrote, they spoke, they agitated, they smuggled, they prepared, and they armed while they appealed to both Heaven and King George III, Unfortunately, only Heaven was amenable to listen.

      Which is why even unto the very last minutes of peace on Lexington Green, the leader of the Militia assembled to prevent an illegal military confiscation of the Commonwealth’s gunpowder stated:

      “Stand your ground. Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.”

      Let’s dissect this.

      “Stand your Ground.” We know our rights. We know (more or less) what we need to live as a free and prosperous society. We are in the right, and we have the right to resist.

      “Don’t fire unless fired upon.” We are not here to kill our countrymen or anyone just because (that is one thing that separates people like Captain Parker from people like you or the murderer here). We have no intention to fire the first shot, and no order for that shall come from me.

      “But if they mean to have a war-” If THEY intend to violate our rights and what is just, if they cannot be persuaded to step back and allow us to maintain our rights and the maintenance of self-defense, there will be a war.

      “…let it begin here!” We are at the breaking point. We have put up and suffered for more than a decade and a half with this kind of nonsense. We can yield no more without being utterly undone, and it is better to die as free men than to live as colonial serfs under military occupation. Not that we’d likely live long under those circumstances anyway, given the rampant risk of having our homes burned down by Amerindian raiding parties or French or Spanish attackers anyway, with our family being shot or sent into slavery while our skulls are split by a tomahawk.

      THAT IS WHAT IS MEANT by how we are in a Second American Revolution, and it will be as bloodless as YOU allow it to be, just as the First American Revolution was as s bloodless or bloody as King George and people like Grenville and other self-righteous, hypocritical moralists trying to impose their will on a free people allowed it to be.

      And I’m not even a FAN of Bannon’s, not really. I hadn’t even heard of Kevin Roberts (and I imagine neither have you) before this, though I did hear of the Heritage Foundation and have mixed feelings about them. BUT SO WHAT?!?! Thomas Paine was a far left radical who increasingly ranted about how the American Revolution wasn’t a “True Revolution” and glorified the Reign of Terror until he was arrested and nearly bisected. There are far more moral objections to be made to him than there are to Kevin Roberts.

      But that didn’t mean that Thomas Paine couldn’t see many of the problems with British America under military occupation or with the Hanoverian Regime as a whole, and give a pithy prognosis of what was wrong. One you cannot even ATTEMPT to contest.

      “Did you drop an email to Steve Bannon or Kevin Roberts asking them to lessen the rhetoric? ”

      In this particular case you were stupid enough to claim, there is nothing untoward about Roberts’ or Bannon’s rhetoric, as a historical awareness that extends beyond Current Year shows. Moreover, YOU HAVE PROVIDED ABSOLUTELY FARQ ALL EXPLANATION OR EVIDENCE FOR WHY THEY WOULD NEED TO “LESSEN THE RHETORIC” REGARDING THAT. Probably because you can’t.

      And I say this as someone who is not a great fan of Bannon given among other things his Paleocon leanings, and whose feelings on Heritage are mixed. But unlike you, they actually understand something important about the American Revolution. An awareness that goes far beyond the Hollywood Myth of “Mel Gibson or who have you goes ham on Redcoats.” That the American Revolution BEGAN as a political movement for freedom rather than independence. It BECAME A WAR *BECAUSE BRITISH OFFICIALDOM WOULD NOT RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF THEIR SUBJECTS ABROAD.*

      The First American Revolution could have been bloodless, or at least nearly bloodless. It could have ended with the Union Jack still flying in Boston and Richmond and the rest. But it was primarily inflexibility, arrogance, and self-righteous hypocrisy that came to a head at Lexington Green and proved that it would not end bloodlessly.

      Good to know you are living down to expectations.

      “Did you write a blog post condemning the rhetoric?”

      Ok scumbag, riddle me this: What is there to condemn?

      No, seriously. Answer me.

      *ANSWER ME.*

      ” If not, then you’re just as much part of the problem as “the left media” as you claim.”

      This is what we call deflection. Bannon and Roberts said NOTHING in the snippet you quoted talking about putting (insert opponent here) in a “bullseye.” They said nothing even about the press being the “enemy of the people” pace Trump. They certainly said nothing like hasanabi or BadEmpanada or Maxine Waters advocating violence. Hell, THEY DID NOT EVEN EXPRESS WISHES THAT THE SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION TURN BLOODY OR BECOME VIOLENT AS THE FIRST ONE DID.

      They simply pointed out the fact. The Second American Revolution exists. It will play out. The question is: how bloody do you and your fellow scumbags intend to make it?

      This is in sharp contrast to the dehumanizing, demonizing rhetoric you peddle.

      “Sadly, you’ll never see it and the conservative movement will continue to stoke violence. Bannon, Onan, Carlson, Hannity, Flynn, Giuliani … the list is exhaustive. And you’re blaming the liberal media?”

      You have provided absolutely zero quotations of them “stoking violence.” indeed, EVEN YOUR OWN GODDAMN QUOTES FAILED TO DO SO. I’m pretty sure I could do better than that.

      Meaning this is just deflection and victim blaming on your part. But what do I expect from Ernst Roehm’s inferior reincarnation? One who possesses the same violent, intolerant, totalitarians leanings but lacks the original’s intelligence and courage?

      “There is nothing anyone is going to say because you’re so enmeshed in a cult.”

      This is ironic coming from you. You quite literally are peddling cultic dogma without awareness.

      “Did you speak out about election workers being threatened?”

      A: Where and when?

      B: Did you speak out about grotesque violations of protocol by many “election workers” like the infamous Miss Braids hauling out a packet of votes from beneath the table and repeatedly scanning one?

      Going to go out on a limb and guess ‘no.’

      Did you speak about Republican Poll Watchers being harassed, expelled, or misled?

      I’m not a betting person by habit but I’m guessing similar.

      “What about people serving in the judicial system?”

      Oh the shameless gall of scum such as you.

      You want to talk about threats regarding people serving in the judicial system? Fine. Let’s talk about it.

      https://www.nationalreview.com/news/suspect-in-kavanaugh-assassination-plot-planned-to-target-two-other-justices-report/

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/15/brett-kavanaugh-assassination-plot-man-indicted

      https://medium.com/@Al.Brown/unique-evidence-that-the-mail-bombs-came-from-leftists-6f7ee4d4dd30

      And God help you if I start getting as far back as the 1970s and 1960s mail bombings or the like, because your idol the Devil certainly will not.

      “The list is endless … ”

      An endless list, and yet you have FAILED TO QUOTE ANY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Or even link to them.

      So either you are absolutely, comically incompetent at citing examples off lists, or you are being dishonest and trying to play “Both Sidesism” (without even the cursory condemnation of the scumbags on your side).

      Which is fitting for you, Rummage Sale Roehm.

      “yet you’ve never said a word; only stoked the flames.”

      Then prove it, scumbag.

      I know you can’t. I’ve caught you multiple times over.

      “The fires will continue to rage until you and your cohorts accept responsibility for your behavior.”

      Uhuh, sure. That’s why Antifascist Action murders people on both sides of the Atlantic, someone tried to murder Trump just now, someone tried to murder Kavanuagh, and we have pro-Hamas scum beating up people in the streets and on campuses.

      The Heritage Foundation and Bannon talking about the American Revolution. Which just shows how you do not understand America.

      Frankly, the Victory Girls should spare your blood libeling, violence inciting, demonizing bunghole from the “toxic”, “radioactive” blog and ban you. You contribute literally nothing of value beyond being a running joke and an easy practice target for people like me to practice our arguments on. And I hope Nina and the others do ban you.

      And you should as well. After all, Kevin, if this site is so “toxic”, wouldn’t it be better to save you from your own obsessive determination to come back to it to harass us?

    • Turtler says:

      Oh joy. Just who I did not want to see coming back to VGB after my sabbatical. Let it not be said I did not give you a chance, Fascist Goon. I read through your post, HOPING you had obtained some basic humanity or ethics since I last encountered you (even if it was something you had to stole).

      No such luck. So time for me to fisk Discount Roehm again.

      “Victory Girls is radioactive and toxic.”

      NOBODY SANE BELIEVES YOU, Comrade Roehm. And do you know why?

      Because you know what people ACTUALLY do when it comes to things or places that are “radioactive and toxic”? THEY AVOID THEM. Indeed, even the corrupt, Krokodil-addled Contractnikiand Hookers-n-Blow obsessed Generaldom of the Russian Federation knew enough to get the heck out of the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (they may not have known enough to AVOID GOING THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE or to not DIG UP THE HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE TOPSOIL, but at least eventually they learned). Even the absolute brainlets that are the Southeastern Taliban and the Naxalites (your soulmates) steer clear from the fallout of the Bhopal Disaster. I myself limit contact between myself and scum like DU.

      AND YET, HERE YOU ARE LURKING AT THE PLACE YOU CLAIM IS “TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE”. Blood libeling us out the wazoo and claiming to be oh so prosecuted by “Fascists” (while resembling Fascists far more than we are), perfectly comfortable that the most that can happen to you is being banned on here.

      You are the VERY EMBODIMENT of what this post talks about. I would know. I’ve dealt with you before.

      “Here’s where politics stumbles … You (the “universal” you) have no control over what others say, the media, politicians, or anyone else.”

      This is what we call gaslighting bullshit. But anybody that claims we have “no control over what others say” is ignoring the fact that people have various means to incentivize or penalize what others say. For instance, on the lower end I can point out how you are being a piece of trash with a striking resemblance to another thuggish, fascistic goon obsessed with his own sexual orientation were it not for Roehm actually knowing half a damn about academic fields and .had the courage to be a Shocktrooper both in the trenches of the Western Front and the fields. This won’t accomplish much more than helping to shine a light in a fine dissection of your dishonesty, illogic, hypocrisy, and totalitarian leanings, but it will help others pile in.

      There is also endorsing those that message as we find appropriate or punishing those we do by deciding who we give attention or focus to. How’s Bud Light going lately? Or the numerous scumbags who got fired because they were dumb enough to reveal unethical and/or unprofessional conduct?

      And then of course there is shining the light of vigilance groups and if need be the State (feel free to insert your mantra of worship to it, “Peace Be Upon It” or somewhat, here) if there is particularly galling things like cheerleading for political violence. Like the number of people that a humiliated Secret Service are going to be visiting because they were dumb enough to publicly advertise how they wished Trump were actually murdered (which I note you fit well into).

      So tell me, Kevin: where were you when Leftist Elected Officials talked gleefully about how Trump was a threat to “our Democracy”, A Fascist, how you and your ilk should get up in their faces, or even about punching them? Where is the registering of your discontent with that?

      “What you do have control over is your words and clearly you have failed the sniff test.”

      ACCORDING TO WHOM, YOU FASCIST GOON?!?! Who ADMINISTERED The Sniff Test? YOU? You have absolutely no credibility in doing so.

      “The president of The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank, said the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling is encouraging and that the group, known for Project 2025, is already in the process of “taking the country back.””

      No words of Bullseyes or Demonization there. In contrast to you.

      ” “We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be,” Kevin Roberts said in an interview on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast on Tuesday.”

      This is not the own you think it is, you historically illiterate mofo. The First American Revolution lasted something like 20-26 years between 1760 (or thereabouts) and 1783.

      To those of you who can do math on a grade school level or who know their history (both of which sadly exclude Kevin the Discount Roehm, who shows how he is once again a sad, pale imitation of his spiritual mentor the Classically Educated Scholar-Socialist-Serial Killing Monster), you’ll notice something:

      WAR DID NOT BREAK OUT UNTIL MORE THAN HALFWAY THROUGH THAT PERIOD, in 1775. And when it did, it broke out because of thuggishness and the violation of rights by the British Parliament and Crown by dint of their military occupation in New England extending to weapon confiscation.

      The VAST MAJORITY OF THE REST OF THIS PERIOD, 1760ish-1775, was spent with the Founders seeking PEACEFUL REDRESS OF THEIR GRIEVANCES WITH THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT, past things such as the Intolerable Acts, the start of military occupation in Boston, the Boston Massacre, the first waves of media censorship and weapon confiscations, and so on. They wrote, they spoke, they agitated, they smuggled, they prepared, and they armed while they appealed to both Heaven and King George III, Unfortunately, only Heaven was amenable to listen.

      Which is why even unto the very last minutes of peace on Lexington Green, the leader of the Militia assembled to prevent an illegal military confiscation of the Commonwealth’s gunpowder stated:

      “Stand your ground. Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.”

      Let’s dissect this.

      “Stand your Ground.” We know our rights. We know (more or less) what we need to live as a free and prosperous society. We are in the right, and we have the right to resist.

      “Don’t fire unless fired upon.” We are not here to kill our countrymen or anyone just because (that is one thing that separates people like Captain Parker from people like you or the murderer here). We have no intention to fire the first shot, and no order for that shall come from me.

      “But if they mean to have a war-” If THEY intend to violate our rights and what is just, if they cannot be persuaded to step back and allow us to maintain our rights and the maintenance of self-defense, there will be a war.

      “…let it begin here!” We are at the breaking point. We have put up and suffered for more than a decade and a half with this kind of nonsense. We can yield no more without being utterly undone, and it is better to die as free men than to live as colonial serfs under military occupation. Not that we’d likely live long under those circumstances anyway, given the rampant risk of having our homes burned down by Amerindian raiding parties or French or Spanish attackers anyway, with our family being shot or sent into slavery while our skulls are split by a tomahawk.

      THAT IS WHAT IS MEANT by how we are in a Second American Revolution, and it will be as bloodless as YOU allow it to be, just as the First American Revolution was as s bloodless or bloody as King George and people like Grenville and other self-righteous, hypocritical moralists trying to impose their will on a free people allowed it to be.

      And I’m not even a FAN of Bannon’s, not really. I hadn’t even heard of Kevin Roberts (and I imagine neither have you) before this, though I did hear of the Heritage Foundation and have mixed feelings about them. BUT SO WHAT?!?! Thomas Paine was a far left radical who increasingly ranted about how the American Revolution wasn’t a “True Revolution” and glorified the Reign of Terror until he was arrested and nearly bisected. There are far more moral objections to be made to him than there are to Kevin Roberts.

      But that didn’t mean that Thomas Paine couldn’t see many of the problems with British America under military occupation or with the Hanoverian Regime as a whole, and give a pithy prognosis of what was wrong. One you cannot even ATTEMPT to contest.

      “Did you drop an email to Steve Bannon or Kevin Roberts asking them to lessen the rhetoric? ”

      In this particular case you were stupid enough to claim, there is nothing untoward about Roberts’ or Bannon’s rhetoric, as a historical awareness that extends beyond Current Year shows. Moreover, YOU HAVE PROVIDED ABSOLUTELY FARQ ALL EXPLANATION OR EVIDENCE FOR WHY THEY WOULD NEED TO “LESSEN THE RHETORIC” REGARDING THAT. Probably because you can’t.

      And I say this as someone who is not a great fan of Bannon given among other things his Paleocon leanings, and whose feelings on Heritage are mixed. But unlike you, they actually understand something important about the American Revolution. An awareness that goes far beyond the Hollywood Myth of “Mel Gibson or who have you goes ham on Redcoats.” That the American Revolution BEGAN as a political movement for freedom rather than independence. It BECAME A WAR *BECAUSE BRITISH OFFICIALDOM WOULD NOT RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF THEIR SUBJECTS ABROAD.*

      The First American Revolution could have been bloodless, or at least nearly bloodless. It could have ended with the Union Jack still flying in Boston and Richmond and the rest. But it was primarily inflexibility, arrogance, and self-righteous hypocrisy that came to a head at Lexington Green and proved that it would not end bloodlessly.

      Good to know you are living down to expectations.

      “Did you write a blog post condemning the rhetoric?”

      Ok scumbag, riddle me this: What is there to condemn?

      No, seriously. Answer me.

      *ANSWER ME.*

      ” If not, then you’re just as much part of the problem as “the left media” as you claim.”

      This is what we call deflection. Bannon and Roberts said NOTHING in the snippet you quoted talking about putting (insert opponent here) in a “bullseye.” They said nothing even about the press being the “enemy of the people” pace Trump. They certainly said nothing like hasanabi or BadEmpanada or Maxine Waters advocating violence. Hell, THEY DID NOT EVEN EXPRESS WISHES THAT THE SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION TURN BLOODY OR BECOME VIOLENT AS THE FIRST ONE DID.

      They simply pointed out the fact. The Second American Revolution exists. It will play out. The question is: how bloody do you and your fellow scumbags intend to make it?

      This is in sharp contrast to the dehumanizing, demonizing rhetoric you peddle.

      “Sadly, you’ll never see it and the conservative movement will continue to stoke violence. Bannon, Onan, Carlson, Hannity, Flynn, Giuliani … the list is exhaustive. And you’re blaming the liberal media?”

      You have provided absolutely zero quotations of them “stoking violence.” indeed, EVEN YOUR OWN GODDAMN QUOTES FAILED TO DO SO. I’m pretty sure I could do better than that.

      Meaning this is just deflection and victim blaming on your part. But what do I expect from Ernst Roehm’s inferior reincarnation? One who possesses the same violent, intolerant, totalitarians leanings but lacks the original’s intelligence and courage?

      “There is nothing anyone is going to say because you’re so enmeshed in a cult.”

      This is ironic coming from you. You quite literally are peddling cultic dogma without awareness.

      “Did you speak out about election workers being threatened?”

      A: Where and when?

      B: Did you speak out about grotesque violations of protocol by many “election workers” like the infamous Miss Braids hauling out a packet of votes from beneath the table and repeatedly scanning one?

      Going to go out on a limb and guess ‘no.’

      Did you speak about Republican Poll Watchers being harassed, expelled, or misled?

      I’m not a betting person by habit but I’m guessing similar.

      “What about people serving in the judicial system?”

      Oh the shameless gall of scum such as you.

      You want to talk about threats regarding people serving in the judicial system? Fine. Let’s talk about it. Tell me about Kavanaugh and how he was nearly murdered.

      And God help you if I start getting as far back as the 1970s and 1960s mail bombings or the like, because your idol the Devil certainly will not.

      “The list is endless … ”

      An endless list, and yet you have FAILED TO QUOTE ANY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Or even link to them.

      So either you are absolutely, comically incompetent at citing examples off lists, or you are being dishonest and trying to play “Both Sidesism” (without even the cursory condemnation of the scumbags on your side).

      Which is fitting for you, Rummage Sale Roehm.

      “yet you’ve never said a word; only stoked the flames.”

      Then prove it, scumbag.

      I know you can’t. I’ve caught you multiple times over.

      “The fires will continue to rage until you and your cohorts accept responsibility for your behavior.”

      Uhuh, sure. That’s why Antifascist Action murders people on both sides of the Atlantic, someone tried to murder Trump just now, someone tried to murder Kavanaugh, and we have pro-Hamas scum beating up people in the streets and on campuses. That’s why we have assassination flicks targeting George W. Bush going back to the first decade of this millennium. It’s never YOUR SIDE’S responsibility. Nuh-uh.

      The Heritage Foundation and Bannon talking about the American Revolution. Which just shows how you do not understand America.

      Frankly, the Victory Girls should spare your blood libeling, violence inciting, demonizing bunghole from the “toxic”, “radioactive” blog and ban you. You contribute literally nothing of value beyond being a running joke and an easy practice target for people like me to practice our arguments on. And I hope Nina and the others do ban you.

      And you should as well. After all, Kevin, if this site is so “toxic”, wouldn’t it be better to save you from your own obsessive determination to come back to it to harass us?

    • Scott says:

      Angry gay man says what???

      Tell me the last time a conservative tried to assassinate someone….
      Now do it with a leftist… especially one of your alphabet mafia types.. like maybe the memphis shooter???

      Are you really stupid enough to actually believe the idiocy you spew, or are you well aware that you’re lying and just working to advance the agenda??

      Why don’t you go back to your butt plug and let the adults talk???

      • Turtler says:

        Angry gay men can at least say important things, like Pim Fortuyn. He’s an angry, fanatical, fascist firebrand, and that’s the main problem.

    • Wendybar says:

      You little man. You are indoctrinated by this corrupt government and you are foolish enough to come on a great blog and spew your hate and lies?? YOU side did this. YOU will rue the day, because Karma is a Beetch, and it’s coming.

    • agimarc says:

      Bring it on, Girly man. We’re ready. There’s an old southern-ism about not letting your alligator mouth overload your hummingbird a$$. Methinks you’ve crossed that line. Good luck swimming back. Cheers –

  • Jack says:

    The only ones I see enmeshed in a cult, are the ones behind Mr. Biden and company.

  • Turtler says:

    For some reason my response to Kevin the Reject Sale Roehm first showed up as an unholy, unformatted jumble of
    Run on, and I am not sure why. In any case probably can’t post it given links.

    • Cameron says:

      “Reject Sale Roehm.”

      Damn, Turtler. That’s a good one.

      • Turtler says:

        Thank you kindly. And I feel we should use it more. Make it stick to Kevin by reminding him we know what he is.

        • Cameron says:

          I want to find his father’s phone number, call him up and ask him to reach out to his son before he bursts a blood vessel.

          • Scott says:

            Good luck with that, like many gay men, he probably went that way because he never got any fatherly love as a child, most likely he doesn’t even know who his father is.. hell, I’d be surprised if his mom knows who it is..

    • Cameron says:

      And now it looks like a duplicate post.

      I liked everything you said, but let’s be honest: The bitter gay man will never answer anything you say to him. His sole purpose in life is coming here to shit on the carpet and leave. He’s a lot like a cousin of mine.

      • Turtler says:

        Let’s not dignify his bullshit by referring to him as a “gay man” or even “bitter gay man.” Pim Fortuyn and Noel Coward were bitter gay men and were brave heroes and penetrating intellects.

        The problem with Rummage Sale Roehm isn’t ultimately that he’s gay, it is that he is a hateful Fascist scumbag.

  • […] THIS:  The Democrat Media Left Built This, They Must Own It. […]

  • Micha Elyi says:

    Not a “Karen” but a Nina.

  • Vince says:

    Big Surprise, Denver rep Steven Woodrow is Jewish. The Jews sure do have an agenda and they hate this country. They make up 2% of the population. Why is Joe biden’s whole cabinet Jewish? First Chief of staff Ron Klein: Jewish. Biden second Chief of staff Jeff Zients: Jewish. Secretary of State Anthony blinken Jewish, attorney general Merrick Garland. His paternal grandfather changed his name from Garfinkel to Garland because he felt you know much like the way people hate Portuguese and Norwegians people hate Jews. Oh wait a minute nobody hates Portuguese and Norwegians. They make up 2% of the population why is this whole cabinet Jewish? Secretary of Homeland security Cuban dude Mayorkas: Jewish. Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen: Jewish. The idiot transexual freak, you know the”first FEMALE 4 star admiral”, Rachel Levine: Jewish. They make up 2% of the population why is every important position is cabinet held by Jews and why do they all want to destroy the country? And let me ask you a question if you know a politician or taken 40 million from the Chinese Communist party would you work for him? Or would you do everything in your power to bring them down. Jews make up 2% of the population in this country last I checked there was what was it?13 14 Jewish senators – way out of proportion – and no moderates everyone is extreme left including our socialist friend from Vermont. Again as far as I know throughout time and throughout geography no one has had problems with Norwegians, Portuguese, Peruvians. Etc. Etc. and then there’s the Jews. They want to take over the world it’s obvious. Why do you think France survived for 2,000 years? Because the Jews are fleeing that country like rats on the sinking ship because they know they’re not wanted. They come here and not only do we welcome them we hand over the keys to the government.

    • Turtler says:

      Oh joy. Kevin must be pleased that an actual Jew Hater came, as if on cue, to distract attention from talking about Kev being a Fascist goon and the equivalent of a watered down Ernst Roehm.

      “Big Surprise, Denver rep Steven Woodrow is Jewish.”

      And the relevance of that is?

      “The Jews sure do have an agenda and they hate this country.”

      If the most devout and observant Jews in the country “hate this country” they sure have an odd way of showing it, given how they vote overwhelmingly for Conservatives and Trump in places like New York City. And how people we know hate this country like Bill DeBlasio also hate them and have discriminated against them.

      And there’s not much that Secular, “Jews in Name/Ancestry Only” hate more than observant Jews, as you can see if you’ve looked at the bitter infighting between Reform and Orthodox. Or you know, the literal history of Karl Marx and George Soros.

      “They make up 2% of the population.”

      Citation Needed.

      “Why is Joe biden’s whole cabinet Jewish? ”

      Answer: They’re not. Especially not in any way worth talking about.

      “First Chief of staff Ron Klein: Jewish. Biden second Chief of staff Jeff Zients: Jewish.”

      Now kindly identify their denomination. Go on, do it.

      “Secretary of State Anthony blinken Jewish,”

      Ok, for the sake of the argument I’ll grant this.

      AND YET, IF YOU BOTHERED DOING AN IOTA OF RESEARCH YOU WOULD NOTICE THAT BLINKEN *DOES NOT GET ON WELL WITH ISRAELIS, AND ESPECIALLY PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU.*

      Funny how that works, and how that undermines your claims that “Jews” have a unified “agenda.”

      “attorney general Merrick Garland. His paternal grandfather changed his name from Garfinkel to Garland because he felt you know much like the way people hate Portuguese and Norwegians people hate Jews. Oh wait a minute nobody hates Portuguese and Norwegians.”

      Even if this is true it is COMPLETELY DAMN IRRELEVANT. Jewish ancestry is traced through the female lineage. So it is his mother’s ancestry you would look at. And lucky for you it is indeed Jewish.

      Also keep in mind: people do hate Portuguese and Norwegians. Indeed, one reason why the tragic British 19th century naval hero James Fitzjames was so insecure about being born illegitimate was the prospect his mother was Portuguese. And that’s just within Europeans. Go overseas and you can see.

      “They make up 2% of the population why is this whole cabinet Jewish?”

      It’s not, again jagoff. You’ve cited four people. The Cabinet has 26 people. And I don’t see you talking about Cardorna and co.

      “Secretary of Homeland security Cuban dude Mayorkas: Jewish.”

      Ok, I’ll let that one pass.

      “Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen: Jewish.”

      Yellen’s family were non-observant and she has not professed any religious beliefs in public. Because Unlike you I’m a big fan of steelmanning my opponents I’ll let this one pass.

      “The idiot transexual freak, you know the”first FEMALE 4 star admiral”, Rachel Levine: Jewish.”

      True, but also NOT A MEMBER OF THE CABINET YOU SIMPERING INCOMPETNET.

      “They make up 2% of the population why is every important position is cabinet held by Jews and why do they all want to destroy the country?”

      Again: You’ve cited a Grand Total of Six Cabinet Members. OUT OF 26 (27 factoring in the changeover in CoS).

      Here’s a few you did not mention.

      Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin (You know, the scumbag who famously demonized Trump and is in charge of the regime’s openly military force): Catholic Black Man (or at least nominally so).

      Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland (In charge of much of the regime’s domestic security apparatus): Unknown as far as I could tell but as an Amerindian, almost certainly NOT Jewish.

      Secretary of Agri Tom Vilsack: Supposedly Roman Catholic.

      Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: Supposedly Catholic

      Secretary of Labor Julie Su: Unknown but as Chinese-American almost certainly NOT Jewish.

      Secretary of Health and Humanities Xavier Baccera: (One of those in charge of the Coof nonsense): Nominally Catholic.

      “Acting” Secretary of HUD Adrianne Todman: Unknown but as a Virgin Islander, almost certainly NOT Jewish.

      Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg: (“Mayor Pete” responsible for the Palestine Crash): Soulless Nominally Mainline Protestant Christianity.

      Secretary of Energy Jen Granholm: Nominally Roman Catholic of Irish ancestry.

      Secretary of Education Miguel Cardorna: Puerto Rican Nominal Catholic.

      Secretary of Vet Affairs Denis McDonough: Nominally Roman Catholic.

      EPA Admin Michael Regan: Unknown but as an African-American from the Carolinas almost certainly NOT Jewish.

      Nat Int Director Avril Haines: Well, look at that, one you missed. Nominally Jewish or at least of Jewish ancestry.

      Trade Rep Kat Tai: Unknown but as Chinese-American almost certainly NOT Jewish.

      UN Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield: Nominally Christian (and ironically the one that probably gets on least-worst with the Israelis).

      Chari of Council on Econ Advisors Jared Bernstein: “Jewish Ancestry” New Age Woo Woo Merchant. I’ll count this because your bigoted butthead probably does and I’m being generous, but if it actually counted you probably would’ve done it.

      Small Business Admin Isabel Guzman: Nominally Catholic.

      Director of Man and Budget Office Shalandra Young: Unknown but almost certainly NOT Jewish.

      Director of Office of Science and Tech Policy Dr. Arati Prabhakar: Unknown but as a first generation Indian-American, I’m guessing NOT Jewish.

      CIA Director William J. Burns: “Christian.”

      So out of the 26 Cabinet Members, 5 can be credibly proven to be “Jewish”. 6 if I pretend and extend it to Jewish ancestry. That’s a disproportionate number…. but it’s also a disproportionate number of Catholics, among others. Which you “conveniently” do not mention.

      And that’s before we actually try to assess things such as denomination and actual religious observation, which tend to drop off a cliff as one goes leftist.

      “And let me ask you a question if you know a politician or taken 40 million from the Chinese Communist party would you work for him? Or would you do everything in your power to bring them down.”

      Define “everything in your power.” There are boxes of liberty to be used in the proper order. I do not expect a Jew hating imbecile who thinks 5 is “the entire” of a 26 cabinet, but I’m not writing this primarily for you.

      “Jews make up 2% of the population in this country last I checked there was what was it?13 14 Jewish senators – way out of proportion – ”

      True, but this is unsurprising. Indeed it’d be surprising if there were none.

      “and no moderates everyone is extreme left including our socialist friend from Vermont.”

      Firstly: your “socialist friend from Vermont” is an avowed Atheist who observes a secular Christianity. As such he does not count.

      Secondly: There are only 8 confirmed “Jewish” Senators at the most at this point.

      Thirdly: You’re ignoring how Schumer got in hot water with the Jewish community over his craven backstab of Israel.

      Fourthly: You’re “conveniently” ignoring the House of Representatives, with people like Max Miller and Anna Paulina Luna.

      “Again as far as I know throughout time and throughout geography no one has had problems with Norwegians, Portuguese, Peruvians. Etc. Etc.”

      Translation: You’re a historically illiterate idiot who has never studied things such as…

      A: St. Brice’s Day Massacre (King Aethelraed the Unready’s attempted Holocaust of Norwegians and other Scandinavians in Britain).

      B: Various bitter Norwegian-Swedish Wars.

      C: The Castilian occupation of Portugal in the 1500s and 1600s.

      D: Racial and national animus against Iberians in the rest of the Med and in Northern Europe, hence why James FitzJames was worried if his mother was Portuguese.

      E: The Peruvian-Chilean Wars including some pogroms by Chileans of Peruvians in disputed territory.

      F: The Peruvian-Ecuadorian Border Conflicts of the 20th century.

      G: Patriot “Anti-Peruvian” Sentiment and even Atrocities during the Hispanic American Revolutions due to Peruvians being largely Royalist/Pro-“Spanish.”

      It’s also ironic you are trying to justify hatred against Jews – often irrational and outright genocidal hatred – as “evidence” for why they should be hated.

      “and then there’s the Jews.”

      Yes, there are. And I imagine if a given nation or people have lived for about 3,000 years, we’d see their accumulated hatreds and vilification.

      “They want to take over the world it’s obvious.”

      ‘It’s Obvious.”

      So obvious that Israel did not even want to take over the Sinai or Gaza, and prospects of a Jewish settlement in Eastern Africa were opposed. So obvious that Jews have spent most of their history in diaspora living among other peoples.

      You’re a moron and a bigot.

      “Why do you think France survived for 2,000 years? Because the Jews are fleeing that country like rats on the sinking ship because they know they’re not wanted.”

      This is comically stupid on a grand level.

      Firstly: “France” at most traces its history back to Clovis the First in the 400s AD. That’s 1,600 Years. And that’s if we’re being generous. A more realistic dating goes back to toe 700s (with the reign of Charles the Bald) or the Treaty of Verdun in 843 AD.

      So that’s at most 1,600 years, and more likely about 1,200.

      Secondly: The first national expulsion from France happened in 1182, after at least 300 years of French history (or between a third and a sixth of French history, depending on how you count). And it lasted less than 20 years.

      The “Great” Expulsion happened in 1306, after about 450 years of French History. It also ironically helped contribute to the nadir of French history starting in the 1300s with Plantagenet invasions, territorial rebellions, and so forth, all made worse by the Black Death.

      Jewish Emancipation in France happened under the French Revolutions at the turn of the 1800s, 200 years ago.

      So the logic is that Jewish expulsions and pogroms did nothing to help France survive as a country besides maybe giving Kings and the like some quick spending money in a clench. Indeed, if anything they probably HURT French Survival due to things like the Dreyfus Affair (where much of the French Government went deranged and sidetracked themselves from looking for a traitorous spy in the pay of their German Imperial archenemy in favor of going after a Loyal, Assimilated Jewish Frenchman) and in terms of Jew Hatred in Vichy helping to coincide with Nazi occupation and slave labor, including of Gentiles.

      But I’m guessing you neither know or care about all of that, and certainly wouldn’t give an accurate assessment of it.

      “They come here and not only do we welcome them we hand over the keys to the government.”

      Right. Last I checked Obama and Biden are not Jewish, nor do they have any fondness for Jews in particular. But keep on ignoring that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead