![Detroit Plans A Rally FOR John Conyers [VIDEO]](https://victorygirlsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/squarect-john-conyers-sexual-conduct-complaint-20171120-400x400.jpg)
Previous post
![VA Hired Doctors Who Had Felony Convictions Or Multiple Malpractice Claims On Their Records [VIDEO]](https://victorygirlsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/img_0610-1-400x400.jpg)
If you haven’t heard already, illegal alien drug dealer Jose Ines Garcia Zarate was found “not guilty” by a San Francisco jury of murder and involuntary manslaughter, as well as assault with a deadly weapon in the 2015 death of Kate Steinle. What you haven’t heard is just how callous, repulsive, tactless, heartless, racist, and lacking in human decency the left’s reaction to the shooting has been.
Jurors convicted the Mexican citizen of being a felon in possession of a firearm, which could bring a three-year sentence.
Prosecutors had argued Garcia Zarate intentionally shot Steinle, 32, with a Sig Sauer .40-caliber handgun as she and her father walked on San Francisco’s Pier 14. But Garcia Zarate’s defense attorney said the shooting was accidental and the bullet ricocheted off the ground and traveled about 80 feet before hitting Steinle.
I’m not an attorney, so I’m ill equipped to discuss the merits of the prosecution’s case. All I know is a beautiful, innocent young woman’s life was snuffed out by an illegal alien drug dealer, who already had racked up seven felony convictions at the time of the shooting. That’s right. He’s an illegal alien. He’s not an undocumented immigrant. He’s not an undocumented worker. He is here illegally—for the sixth time—after having been booted from this country five times prior to this incident. The feds just can’t seem to keep this turd out of our country. So, I don’t want to hear how human beings cannot be illegal. Yeah, they can, and this morsel of rancid monkey effluvia is a particularly heinous example of illegal scum.
In response to the jury decision, a new movement to #BoycottSanFrancisco began to trend. Believe it or not, a lot of folks want nothing to do with that most wretched hive of scum and villainy (my most humble apologies to the Mos Eisley spaceport for the comparison), since it shields sub-human sacks of knob cheese like this Garcia Zarate shit weasel and provides them with sanctuary from the law. The left, however, couldn’t possibly comprehend this type of free market reaction, so they proceeded to crow with glee at the jury’s decision to exonerate the murderer and mock conservative outrage by drawing false equivalencies to the deaths of Trayvon Martin, Freddie Gray, Michael Brown, and others.
Freddie Gray
Walter Scott
Eric Harris
Tamir Rice
Trayvon Martin
Philando Castillo
Michael Brown
Eric Garner
Sandra Bland
Dontre Hamilton
Terence CrutcherAll dead.
No convictions.
But now you get mad. But now you protest? #BoycottSanFrancisco
— Joshua (@Spacenerd1776) December 1, 2017
While some of those mentioned above are certainly worth getting outraged about, and many conservatives did just that, let’s not try to compare a thug like Trayvon Martin, who described himself as a “gangsta,” liked to get high, and who attacked George Zimmerman before getting himself ventilated, to an innocent young woman who was merely walking along a pier with her dad.
Let’s not compare this peaceful boycott to the Ferguson riots after police officer Darren Wilson shot Michael Brown, which featured looting and violent unrest in the vicinity of the shooting or the Baltimore riots after the death of drug dealer Freddie Gray in police custody.
Others immediately dragged race into the picture.
Racists want to #BoycottSanFrancisco because a jury there didn’t convict a Mexican guy for being Mexican. I don’t think anyone in San Francisco will miss these racists.
— Palmer Report (@PalmerReport) December 1, 2017
No, douche cracker. The jury didn’t convict this particular Mexican guy for murdering an innocent young woman, and that’s why people are angry. His race and national origin don’t matter, except to racist, lying swine like you.
#BoycottSanFrancisco
1 white girl > 26 churchgoers
1 white girl > 58 concertgoers
1 white girl > 26 schoolchildren— #ShowUsYourTaxes (@realLucyAmato) December 1, 2017
And the tweet above just boggles in its tone deafness and its inability to accurately assess the issue at stake.
Twenty six churchgoers weren’t murdered by an illegal alien shielded by Sutherland Springs. They were murdered by an insane, violent former military service member, and the Air Force is being investigated for its failure to report this guy to the NICS system as a violent domestic abuser.
The city of Las Vegas wasn’t responsible for the actions of one lone lunatic who shot up a country music festival. He had no criminal record, and Las Vegas did nothing to shield him from legal scrutiny.
Same goes for Newtown. It wasn’t responsible for protecting the foul pedophile Adam Lanza, shielding him from scrutiny and from police action.
All three scumbags are dead, which is three scumbags less in the world, and I’m certainly not shedding a single tear at their violent departures. None of them had a trial, but I suspect that if they did, and the juries in those cities acquitted them, the backlash would have been epic in scope.
But back to San Francisco. This is a city that allowed this repugnant felon to run around and limited its cooperation with the federal authorities as they work to enforce the nation’s immigration laws. Its ordinance declares that local authorities cannot hold illegal aliens for immigration officials if they had no violent felonies on their records and did not currently face charges. Too bad Garcia had already racked up seven felonies when he slipped back into the country and was walking around without fear in San Francisco. Meanwhile, San Francisco is standing firm in protecting criminals within its borders. Garcia Zarate was released from a San Francisco jail—despite a federal request to detain him so he could be deported for the sixth time (when is he going to learn that he’s just not welcome here?)—just a few weeks before he murdered Kate Steinle.
But the left doesn’t see the difference. They don’t have the critical thinking skills required to understand the boycott is not about race, and they don’t have the human decency to NOT gleefully cheer when an innocent woman is murdered by an illegal alien shitbird who benefits from the policies they espouse.
They only care about innocent victims if they’re not white. If they’re white, no matter how innocent, these leftist slime laugh and rejoice.
To these racist social justice zealots, it’s just so much karma coming to bite white people in their collective ass.
Justice be damned.
GWB says: this morsel of rancid monkey effluvia
I’m curious, Marta. Do you use a thesaurus, or is that innate vocabulary coming out?
😉
Marta Hernandez says: In this case, I did not use a thesaurus. But there are times I simply forget words, or experience a brain freeze and can’t translate them from my native language. In those cases I do use a thesaurus or Google translate. 🙂
GWB says: Oh yes, forgot about the ESL bit. That could help explain some of the … colorful metaphors you employ. I should really make a running log of them all to employ. 🙂
GWB says: As to the merits, it seems the jury had a reason for “reasonable doubt”, given there was evidence the shot ricocheted off the ground. It’s ridiculous the prosecution couldn’t make the negligence and possibly malice argument. You pick up a gun you find, put your booger hook on the bang switch, is just gross negligence – especially in a crowded place. And, if you don’t know anything about guns, then you should NOT TOUCH it. Then work up from there (using a “but, given the possibility of that criminal negligence, we still think he deliberately pointed the weapon and pulled the trigger, with intent to hit someone” argument).
We have a problem with some of the arguments coming from the right. They tend to try and use incidents of illegal aliens doing bad things in such a way that the progs can easily answer “but Americans do that stuff, too! Getting rid of illegal aliens undocumented immigrants migrant workers won’t stop it.”
We need to make certain we are keeping the argument on the most important point: sovereignty. So, even with this tool, we need to keep it to the idea that We don’t want him in Our house. And We have that right.
(Did you see where Haley announced we’re pulling out of the UN immigration deal? Because:
…our decisions on immigration policies must always be made by Americans and Americans alone … We will decide how best to control our borders and who will be allowed to enter our country.
)
Nina says: Couple of things to note on this GWB.
1. The guy was a known drug dealer. yet the defense used the argument that he ‘didn’t no nuttin’ about no gunz!’ You can’t tell me that, after all that time dealing drugs he never handled a gun?
2. Jury wasn’t allowed to know about his status as an illegal
3. Jury asked to see the Sig and check out the firing pin. Judge said no. Which is really odd considering the defense claimed that it was a hair trigger …so why not let the jury try it out?
Just some things that make you go HMMMMM….
GWB says: Plenty of low-level drug dealers don’t use guns. So, entirely possible.
The whole “hair-trigger” thing is a mess. I believe Sigs are Double-Action/Single-Action (DA/SA), meaning the first shot (after de-cocking or loading a first round from a non-locked-back condition) requires a strong enough pull to cock, then fire the weapon (like a Glock). Every shot after that (until de-cocked) only requires a pull of the trigger to fire the weapon as the slide action with each round cocks the hammer. (BTW, this is the way EVERY DADGUM semi-automatic pistol in the world worked until probably the late 80s. [I’m willing to be corrected on that, but the number of DA-only pistols was miniscule until Glock.]) It’s possible someone fired the pistol, and left in a ‘ready’ condition. But, that’s why it’s negligence to put your booger hook on the bang switch.
As to not letting the jury handle it, that’s something neither side wants. The definition of “hair trigger” for each of the jurors will be different, and letting them handle it (especially since no one with any gun savvy evidently explained DA/SA properly) is likely to swing one or more jurors the wrong way. Give them test measurements of the trigger pull, but don’t let them handle it. Standard lawyering there.
His status as an illegal alien is irrelevant to the case at hand, except to impeach him as a witness for the defense. In that case, his repeated law-breaking is relevant. But that’s not specific to his illegal presence in this country.
But, yes, the whole prosecution seemed inadequate.
DonM says: First semiautomatic pistol with the double action first round single action subsequent round was the German P-38, later sold as P-1. by Walther. Typical single action (second and subsequent round) trigger pull is 4-5 pounds. Typical first round trigger pull is 10-15 rounds. The distance that you have to pull the trigger is the big discriminator.
obijohn says: Very common for unskilled criminals to jerk the trigger and shoot below their target… which could result in a ricochet. Regardless, guns don’t fire unless someone pulls the trigger. But the jury blamed the gun… California.
SCSIwuzzy says: Unlike Glock, Sig Sauer makes more than one kind of action.
Some are DA/SA, others are DAO or SAO, all hammer fired, and the 320 series is a striker fired DA like the Glocks.
I’ve heard conflicting information on the actual pistol used.
Brian Brandt says: I read that it was a Sig Sauer P239, which, in almost configurations, is a DA/SA.
Scott says: Not odd at all Nina, letting them see the gun would have proven the BS about the “hair trigger”, and the leftist judge couldn’t have anything like the truth coming out…
Nina says: That is very true…
Alex Bensky says: Marta, this is not about your post, on which I cannot improve. But your description says you want to have a wombat one day and you might want to dig out a copy of Will Cuppy’s “How to Attract the Wombat,” which should be able to help when you’re ready to look for one.
Marta Hernandez says: Ooooh!!! I just looked it up, and it sounds like a riot! I love those fat, furry little guys!
SDN says: Marta, as I pointed out to this douchecanoe on Twitter, she was certainly one of the oxygen thieves who were cheering the first two examples because #TrumpSupporters.
Marta Hernandez says: Completely unsurprising. And disgusting. These people aren’t even human.
sound awake says: what would you expect from a state that changed the law to make it NOT a felony to KNOWINGLY infect someone with HIV
the left ruins everything it touches and they dont truly believe in anything they preach to us about
if they really loved women and children and gays they would hate muslims
Bandit says: Racists want to #BoycottSanFrancisco because a jury there didn’t convict a Mexican guy for being Mexican.
Is this idiot implying all Mexicans kill tourists?
Scottie says: The essence of the Hebrew Bible, transmitted by Christianity, is separation: between life and death, nature and God, good and evil, man and woman, and the holy and the profane. — Dennis Prager
This attacks the separation between good and evil.
James says: The defense was able to show that the bullet hit the ground and ricocheted. This created reasonable doubt as to intent.
My question for some lawyers. Wasn’t Zarate in the act of committing illegal reentry? (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1326 “…enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States,…”) If so, wouldn’t this qualify as felony murder even if the death was accidental?
Rick Stilson says: It’s worse than that. He was in federal custody, then San Francisco insisted that he be transferred to their custody for an old marijuana charge. Then as soon as the feds let him go to San Francisco, they threw out the charges, and released him. They purposely went looking for prisoners already in federal custody, and pull legal maneuvers to get him released onto the San Francisco streets.
Jim says: One of the most beautifully written articles I’ve read in a long time; articulate, hard hitting, logical, and the appropriate tone for the subject matter.
I get the impression you could write most anything well. You have a talent.
22 Comments