Just days after the Trump administration goes after Iran’s nuclear sites, the press is “reporting”: Trump and his bombs may not have destroyed the nuclear sites they set out to destroy.

“U.S. Bombs Did Nit Destroy Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Early Intel Suggests”, reads one headline from CNN. As predicted, MSNBC said it, too.

There are plenty of questions about Donald Trump’s decision to launch pre-emptive military strikes against nuclear targets in Iran, but in the short term, there’s one consideration of particular relevance: Did these strikes work? Did they serve their intended purpose?”-Steve Benin, MSNBC

Plenty of questions, they say. Of course. Some of these questions? Did the strikes work? Did they serve their intended purpose?

CNN’s anonymous sources peddle the same defeatist narrative that enabled Iran’s nuclear blackmail for decades. The Fordow bunker collapsed under 30,000-pound bunker busters—satellite imagery shows entrances buried, ventilation shafts destroyed. Natanz’s centrifuge halls took…

— DOGEai (@dogeai_gov) June 24, 2025

But, “questions linger”, says Fox News.

A report released last week by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) explains that the special “bunker buster” bombs the U.S. used in Iran over the weekend that everyone is talking about, known as GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, or MOPs, might not be able to fully destroy the Iranian nuclear facility at Fordow. Fordow, which Trump said was “gone” now following the strike, is considered central to Iran’s nuclear weapon-making capabilities.

Meanwhile, a satellite imagery expert relayed to Reuters that confirmation of below-ground destruction could not be determined via pictures alone, because the facility’s hundreds of centrifuges are too deeply buried in order to make an accurate determination.”-Alec Schemmel, Fox News

May not have been strong enough to make an “accurate determination”. Because the facilities were underground. A PICTURE from 20,000 feet up is not going to assess this damage. Still, an intellegence arm is going to make an “assessment” and say the bombs didn’t destroy squat.

This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as ‘top secret’ but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.”-Karoline Leavitt

CNN’s newest reporter pic.twitter.com/w3iNoAOoOg

— Ginger (@GingerOrichar) June 25, 2025

How ’bout those air vents?

But, Iran was “years away” from creating a nuclear weapon…or was it a few months? Who knows? Ask Erin Burnett. If, these weapons plants have not been damaged by these 30,000-pound bombs that pummeled Iran’s nuclear facilities and if, by chance, Iran moved their weapons elsewhere, why did they retaliate with the weak weapons that they did in Qatar?

It’s cool, though. CNN got their talking points from their “anonymous sources” and they’re going with that. The “This is CNN”. slogan has been changed to “Trust Us Bro”.

Some of these “journalists” must have gotten this information from the same “sources” that said Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian “disinformation.” I see a few familiar names, here.

from the reliable Natasha Bertrand who claimed the Hunter laptop was disinformation & the Steele dossier was real.

— Coffee Bean King (@Fredroks) June 24, 2025

Leave it to the press at the liberal media to pour water on an accomplishment by Trump’s administration. They are really a miserable lot. They cannot stand at all to see Trump succeed where others have utterly failed.

There’s no shortage of moving parts to a story like this, which may very well continue to evolve, not just in the coming days, but even in the coming hours. But as things stand, what we have is some preliminary evidence, not only that the mission fell short of its objectives, but also that the American president misled the public about the efficacy of his controversial and unpopular policy, all while White House officials once again discard intelligence assessments from their own country that told Trump and his team what they didn’t want to hear.”-Steven Benen, MSNBC

And, there’s no shortage of utter disdain from our press. They have preliminary evidence from an unknown source that they want the blind, oblivious masses who hang on their every words to believe. The mission, did not “fall short” of its objective. Our military carried out their duties and FAR from fell short. If we want to discuss falling short, we have a plethora of news stories we can bring to the surface that the American press refused to cover without a slant for about 8 years now. The only misleading thing that is happening here is with the disingenuous reporting that we hear daily from CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the journalists whose TDS is incurable.

Losers.

Feature Photo Credit: The White House/Wikimedia Commons.org/altered/Public Domain/Jim Varhegyi/Wikimedia Commons.org/cropped/Public Domain