John Roberts Drops Hammer on Squabbling

John Roberts Drops Hammer on Squabbling

John Roberts Drops Hammer on Squabbling

Perhaps the hour was so late that everyone was getting irritable and combative. But after the midnight hour, Chief Justice John Roberts finally had it up to his eyeballs with impeachment histrionics. So he dropped the hammer on Rep. Jerry Nadler (Team Impeach) and White House Counsel Pat Cipollone.

I think Roberts was just trying to be fair to both sides, so he addressed both warring camps.

“I think it is appropriate at this point for me to admonish both the House managers and president’s counsel in equal terms to remember that they are addressing the world’s greatest deliberative body. Those addressing the Senate should remember where they are.”

Do you think either side will heed the words of John Roberts? Not for a moment.

John Roberts


But let’s be realistic here: who is playing offense, and who is playing defense?

Eric Felten at RealClearPolitics analyzed how the Democrats loaded even the written House Impeachment brief with manipulative language. They included words like “debunked,” “discredited,” and “baseless,” while “conspiracy” was used a whopping 56 times. Since the House managers can’t really prove anything, they repeat these emotive words over and over, hoping they can suck in a gullible GOP senator. It’s Propaganda 101.

After the release of the impeachment brief on Saturday, the Democrats took their propaganda game to the Senate floor on Tuesday, the opening day of the series. Tuesday’s brouhaha centered on getting former National Security Advisor John Bolton to testify before the Senate. The Dems are hoping Bolton will provide them the rope with which they can hang Trump’s presidency, especially because there’s no love lost between Trump and Bolton. In fact, while the hearings were taking place, Bolton met with the parents of Otto Warmbier, the student whose death came at the hands of the North Korea regime. Basically it was a dig at Trump’s attempts to negotiate with Kim Jong-un.

So Rep. Nadler taunted the GOP senators by asking them if they want to be “complicit” in a “cover-up” by not allowing Bolton to testify.

“Will you bring ambassador Bolton here? Will you permit us to present you with the entire evidence of the president’s misconduct? Or will you instead choose to be complicit in the president’s cover-up?”

Whereupon White House Counsel Pat Cipollone fired back:

“They don’t tell you that they didn’t bother to call Mr. Bolton themselves. They didn’t subpoena him.”

“So for them to come here now and demand that before we even start the arguments, that they ask you to do something that they refused to do for themselves, and then accuse you of a cover-up when you don’t do it — it’s ridiculous. Talk about out of control government.”

Then, towards the end of the long, 13-hour impeachment spectacle, Nadler began provoking Trump’s counsel by insinuating that they’re liars. I’m surprised he didn’t follow up with “pants on fire.”

“And they lie. And lie and lie and lie.” 

Cipollone shot back at Nadler:

“Mr. Nadler, you owe an apology to the President of the United States and his family. You owe an apology to the Senate. But most of all, you owe an apology to the American people.”

Finally John Roberts had enough. He admonished both Team Impeach and Team Trump.

So should the GOP Senate call Bolton to testify in order to keep peace between the tribes?

Absolutely not, says Cornell law professor William A. Jacobson. Speaking with radio host Tony Katz on Tuesday, Jacobson made these points:

“What they want to do here is just make this into a spectacle. They want to do what they did to Brett Kavanaugh during his hearings. They want to have the evidence come in and then when they don’t seem to be winning, they want to bring in more witnesses . . . They are trying to turn this into a circus.”

Chief Justice John Roberts may have tried to add some decorum to the impeachment proceedings, but with the Democrats’ insistence upon making this impeachment a circus, I wouldn’t hold out hope for civility on the Senate floor. Especially since the Democratic side is already full of clowns.


Featured image: Mussi Katz/flickr/cropped/public domain.

Written by

Kim is a pint-sized patriot who packs some big contradictions. She is a Baby Boomer who never became a hippie, an active Republican who first registered as a Democrat (okay, it was to help a sorority sister's father in his run for sheriff), and a devout Lutheran who practices yoga. Growing up in small-town Indiana, now living in the Kansas City metro, Kim is a conservative Midwestern gal whose heart is also in the Seattle area, where her eldest daughter, son-in-law, and grandson live. Kim is a working speech pathologist who left school system employment behind to subcontract to an agency, and has never looked back. She describes her conservatism as falling in the mold of Russell Kirk's Ten Conservative Principles. Don't know what they are? Google them!

  • James Raclawski says:

    boy…. I dig what you’re laying down… except characterizing these (d) democrats as “clowns”…. clowns are harmless slap stick comedy workers…. maybe even serve a real critical purpose such as the rodeo clowns…..
    these are more akin to “Pennywise” in king’s….. IT… and like that clown…. ours are always scheming ….
    they are treacherous…. deceitful…. conniving…. carpetbaggers…. their corruption knows no bounds… this attempt will fail…. but they surely have back up plans to their back up plan….

    goshdarnit…. I hate politicians… especially ones that are friggin lawyers……

  • RDM says:

    Roberts had no place trying to make this a ‘both sides’ issue when it was blatantly and clearly Nadler that was out of order.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner