Supreme Court Allows Full Trump Travel Ban 3.0 And The Left Loses It’s Mind, Again [VIDEO]

Supreme Court Allows Full Trump Travel Ban 3.0 And The Left Loses It’s Mind, Again [VIDEO]

Supreme Court Allows Full Trump Travel Ban 3.0 And The Left Loses It’s Mind, Again [VIDEO]

Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld the law. Specifically they decided that the travel ban, which we’ve written about often, instituted by President Trump can move forward. Via Legal Insurrection: 

The Supreme Court will allow President Trump’s Third Travel Ord to take full effect, the Justices ruled in two Orders Monday afternoon staying lower court rulings enjoining the Travel Order

President Trump’s Third Travel Order restricted entry of nationals from Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Chad, Somalia, North Korea and Venezuela.

Lower court rulings, specifically those from radical judges from Maryland and Hawaii, were stayed. You can read them here and here.

Interestingly, although Justices Ginsberg and Sotomayor ruled against; Justices Breyer and Kagan (an Obama appointee!) joined the other five in ruling in favor of the Trump Administration.

Ok, I laughed out loud at this one:

And of course, the wailing and gnashing of teeth began in about .00045 seconds after the news broke.

Huh?? Exactly ONE justice has been appointed to the Supreme Court thus far. If that’s stacking, someone needs to review the definition of ‘stacking.’

Yeah…this poor poor guy just doesn’t understand the difference between Muslim, Islam, and terrorism. So SAD!

Divided?? Since WHEN is a decision of 7-2 divisive?? Oh wait, that’s because the decision went FOR Trump instead of against him. Wanna bet it would’ve been a very different headline if decision had been reversed?

Oh goody! There’s a hashtag!


Really good question!

The harpies over at Women’s March won’t say a word about Kate Steinle …but they are all over this like fat kids on cake!

This is rich coming from the one who called for jihad against the U.S…


Yep, good ole Linda has all the usual Leftist talking points down cold.

She’s so CUTE!!! Yeah. No.

Meanwhile, let’s keep things real guys. This is a TRAVEL BAN from countries where there is literally little to ZERO vetting processes in place. But yeah, let’s try to compare apples to oranges to limes shall we?

Keep in mind, this was the second case before the Supreme Court.

Now, does this mean the travel ban stay just issued by the Court today will hold, even though there are cases in the lower courts still pending? Actually it is highly possible.

In other words, activist judges take note. When the law is applied your activist political rulings will usually get thrown out. Perhaps this is the reminder that those judges needed. Rule on the LAW, not on your political leanings.

Will the left learn that lesson? Yeah. No. The oh so cute #NoMuslimBanEver hashtag on Twitter shows us that the meltdowns and temper tantrums is their response to the Supreme Court’s massive reality check today.

Written by

  • Johnny says:

    ‘Nuff said.

  • Scott says:

    Not sure I agree with you Nina…”the left looses it’s mind”?… wouldn’t that imply that they had a mind to begin with??

  • parker says:

    Scott has it correct, leftists are devoid of common sense, clueless about history, and in denial about human nature. That is why they are dangerous and why the blood of hundreds of millions stain the grubby, insane hands.

  • Kevin says:

    I think it’s great on its merits.

    But as a Canadian all I can say is oh shit here they come.

  • Scott says:

    oooh, and i forgot, as far as that liar and sharia advocate sarsour, the only thing i can think t say about her is a phrase that ends in “and the horse(or should it be camel?) she rode in on!!!”

  • Putupjob says:

    The obot HI judge will be back in a few days with a new bogus injunction.

  • alanstorm says:

    Dear America,

    Just because something is legal doesn’t make it right.
    Do you know what else was legal?

    – Slavery
    – Jim Crow
    – Japanese Internment#NoMuslimBanEver

    — Simran Jeet Singh (@SikhProf) December 4, 2017

    Funny you should bring up three Democratic legacies.

    • Scott says:

      Wait Alan, you’re bringing up facts, and ones that are not complimentary to demonrats (are there any that are???) that cannot be allowed, you’re ot listening to the message… pay no attention to the man behind the curtain…

  • Denton Salle says:

    So apparently Kagan cares about the law, where Ginsberg and Sotomayor care more about party? We knew Ginsberg was a tool of the party; we now know Sotomayor is too. Amazing how both will screw over their sex and faiths for their party.

    • Scott says:

      Denton, everyone who’s been paying attention knows that Sotomayorrrrr is as leftist as you can get (that’s why obummer put her there)… the only surprise is that Kagan didn’t vote with the lefties

  • GWB says:

    Specifically they decided that the travel ban, which we’ve written about often, instituted by President Trump can move forward.

    Actually, they told them they had already decided it could go into effect until oral arguments, and they should stop being political obstructionists when a superior court has already told you to SUAC.

  • GTB says:

    Those people need to be sanctioned as vexatious litigants. It’s the same money fueling these suits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner