Sweet, merciful Baby Jesus. Here we go again. They finally have President Donald Trump Episode #5548, the Epstein Birthday Doodle Edition. Last night, the Wall Street Journal printed the “Epstein Birthday Doodle” allegedly drawn by Donald Trump. That’s a stretch. The Venus de Milo cropped version is the featured image at the top of this post. These PEOPLE are sad and desperate. I call Statute of Limitations. The fakakta doodle is from 2003. 2003! A fakakta birthday doodle.
Back in July, on my birthday, I wrote that I no longer gave a “flying fig” about Jeffrey Epstein. I am sorry for the victims. But anything else, forget about it. This alleged birthday doodle that Donald Trump was supposed to have done for Epstein’s 50th birthday is STOOPID! Making a story of it is STOOPID. The Wall Street Journal is STOOPID. The opening salvos from the Journal’s “Epstein Birthday Doodle” expose:
Lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein’s estate have given Congress a copy of the birthday book put together for the financier’s 50th birthday, which includes a letter with President Trump’s signature that he has said doesn’t exist.
On Monday, House Oversight Committee members confirmed that they received a copy of the birthday book including the letter bearing Trump’s signature and a letter that references Trump with a crude joke about a woman from another Epstein associate.
“President Trump called the Epstein investigation a hoax and claimed that his birthday note didn’t exist. Now we know that Donald Trump was lying and is doing everything he can to cover up the truth,” said Rep. Robert Garcia (D., Calif.), who is the committee’s Democratic ranking member. “Enough of the games and lies, release the full files now.”
The Oversight Committee has released some files they have received from the Justice Department as of September 2:
Today, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released 33,295 pages of Epstein-related records that were provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. On August 5, Chairman Comer issued a subpoena for records related to Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, and the Department of Justice has indicated it will continue producing those records while ensuring the redaction of victim identities and any child sexual abuse material.
Whatever will Ranking Member Garcia do when all the papers have been released and he still doesn’t have what he wants. On to the next scandal, I suppose because this is what they are reduced to now….from 2003. And, this drawing is “crude”:
BREAKING: House Oversight Democrats release the letter that they claim President Trump wrote to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday. pic.twitter.com/Izp55Xyx06
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) September 8, 2025
More from the Journal:
The Wall Street Journal in July reported on the book and the letter bearing Trump’s name, which contained typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman. The letter concluded: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.” The signature was a squiggly “Donald” below the waist, mimicking pubic hair.
Oh my stars and garters, these people are so pervy. I could maybe believe Trump doing the drawing, maybe. But I cannot even begin to see him asking his professional office staff to type up the words inside the drawing.
Trump has denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, calling it “a fake thing.” He also filed a lawsuit against the Journal’s reporters, Journal publisher Dow Jones, parent company News Corp and executives, alleging defamation and saying the letter was “nonexistent.” A Dow Jones spokeswoman said, “We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting.”
If I were with the Journal, I wouldn’t have so much confidence in the rigor and accuracy of the reporting. I think the signature is kind of sketchy too. My signature changes on a daily basis.
Weird, bizarre that the signature and not the body type of Trump's letter has become the social media talking point? I think so. #ksleg https://t.co/FoiSf452YP
— Bert Roots, Rock, Rebel (@BPeppered) September 9, 2025
Trump has broken all of these people. Including Jonathan Chait with The Atlantic:
The Epstein Letter Is Real, and It’s Bad
The president’s initial strategy of denying that the document exists leaves him with few options now that it has been made public.
When The Wall Street Journal reported two months ago that Donald Trump had written a suggestive letter to Jeffrey Epstein in celebration of the notorious child abuser’s 50th birthday, in 2003, the administration had a choice of available responses. The strategy it went with was indignant denial.
“Democrats and Fake News media desperately tried to coordinate a despicable hoax,” said the White House spokesperson Liz Huston. “Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bullshit,” Vice President J. D. Vance wrote on X. “The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it. Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?” Trump sued the Journal’s parent company and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, for defamation, seeking $10 billion in damages. In the legal complaint, Trump’s lawyers accused the paper of “malicious, deliberate, and despicable actions,” including publishing “a series of quotes from the nonexistent letter.”
ABC News pays Trump 15 million dollars for defamation.
CBS pays Trump 16 million dollars.
President Trump sues Wall Street
Journal for 10 billion dollars over the Epstein story.— AndyC (@andyc4815) September 8, 2025
Back to Chait and The Atlantic: He closes with this bon mot:
When the Journal story first broke, Vance demanded, “Will the people who have bought into every hoax against President Trump show an ounce of skepticism before buying into this bizarre story?”
The episode certainly does tell us something about Trump and the need for appropriate levels of skepticism. Don’t count on the president’s cultists to draw the right conclusion.
“Draw the right conclusion”, wow, that’s a real knee slapper. This whole thing is too wrong. I think there should be a statute of limitations on shite that doesn’t matter.
Featured Image: A portion of An image of the letter bearing Trump’s signature, which has been turned over to Congress by the Epstein estate/Not Copyrighted/cropped
Skillyboo says: Was it signed with Biden’s autopen? Just asking LOL.
Way back when, I used to watch the Pawn Stars “reality” show. If Rick got this “letter” into his shop, the first thing he would have done, he would have called in a signature expert to validate that the signature is real.
I have not seen a single report where anyone has done what a Las Vegas pawn shop operator would have done as the first thing.
This supposed letter is also, somehow, with an unvalidated signature, a “smoking gun” – whereas a laptop with pictures of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it is still being called “fake Russian disinformation.”
A reader says: While this isn’t an official “signature expert”— that will likely only occur during discovery if the suit goes forward— it does show how similar the signature on the birthday letter is to other personal signatures from that time. The chances of someone forging it back in early 2000’s before Trump was president, plus considering this is a private book only intended for the recipient makes such a claim laughable.
Also this is why being in a news bubble is such a bad look!
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/us/politics/trump-signature-epstein-letter.html
Give me an hour or two, and I could produce a “signature” that looks “similar,” so far as a TDS afflicted NYT “journalist” is concerned. Or a WSJ “journalist” that is missing his Costa Rican nanny with “benefits.” Or you.
The central claim in the lawsuit is that it is a forgery – which means it WILL be analyzed by actual handwriting experts in discovery. If, that is, the WSJ doesn’t realize that FAFO is now in operation and short circuits that process.
A reader says: If it wasn’t blindly clear that this author is in a cult it certainly is now. Her disdain for the hundreds if not potentially thousands of victims of Epstein is nauseating. She would rather protect her orange god than even for a moment consider that he could be a part of Epstein’s crimes. The fact that she keep trying to sweep it away when evidence keeps mounting says everything about her.
First of all, there have been PLENTY of discussions about both the signature and the note itself online. She’s clearly in an information silo. Many women and some men, including George Conway, have pointed out that the picture depicts a prepubescent or very young teenage girl given the anatomy depicted. That alone is jaw dropping because it shows that Trump, along with nearly everyone else who submitted materials for the birthday book, was fully aware of Epstein’s proclivities. And before anyone continues with the absolutely laughable and insane farce that it can’t be his signature, both the New York Times and Wall Street Journal have compared the signature to others he gave around the same time and all are remarkably similar. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/us/politics/trump-signature-epstein-letter.html
Plus if someone was forging it they would have to be truly clairvoyant to know that Trump would be president now and to then think of attacking him! Face it, this book is letters from Epstein’s friends, family and associates and it contains several personal in-jokes and references, many of which point to his proclivities being well known. The dear leader was close friends with a pedophile. That’s a fact and it’s undeniable. (Though I’m sure this author will still try to deny it.)
For anyone interested, here is the entire book in all its disgusting, smutty glory. It’s on a Google Drive and is Request Number 1. https://oversight.house.gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-records-provided-by-the-epstein-estate-chairman-comer-provides-statement/
Also since this author is so keen to explain away everything, how will she explain this?: https://www.axios.com/2025/09/09/epstein-birthday-book-trump-reference-house-democrats
That image directly references Trump and refers to Epstein selling Trump a “fully depreciated” woman for $22,500 as if she’s a used car. The level of depravity there has no bounds. It’s clear yet again that Trump was part of Epstein’s inner circle.
Oh but I’m sure this author will just waive this away and be perfectly fine supporting someone who was friends with a pedophile. And if perhaps evidence is released that show Trump was in on the CSA or sex trafficking, she’ll explain that away too. Because when you’re in a cult there is literally nothing the leader does that can turn you off. (And one of the hallmarks of being in a cult is denying that you’re in one!)
One wonders if any of the other writers here will show reason on this matter. Carol did at one point. Perhaps she will again.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is a progressive disease. I hope you have arrangements made for the home where they will keep the drool wiped off of your chin and your diaper changed. Although they will be rather overwhelmed by all of the other MSNBC zombies.
[…] blog of the day is Victory Girls Blog, with a post on Trump’s Epstein birthday doodle being a sick […]
7 Comments