Calling Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (Dingbat-CA) a partisan hack is like calling snow cold. This Sunday on Face the Nation, San Fran Nan jumped the shark. Pelosi completely dismissed 300 years of common law and the theory of due process in the Fourteenth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. In her view, President Donald Trump is guilty until he proves his innocence.

I checked Nancy Pelosi’s biography (No, partisan hack isn’t there.). While she does have a degree in Political Science, she never attended law school. She has, however, been a lawmaker since 1920 1987. One might think that three decades of being in the halls of Congress, where you can’t swing a plastic surgeon’s gown without hitting a lawyer, that she might have heard something about common law. I have come to the conclusion that Mrs. Pelosi is not only a partisan hack; she is stupid with a capital STOOP. She is intellectually vacuous and interested only in power.

The Speaker got the soft treatment on Face the Nation, no push back. From Politico, here she is:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she and House impeachment investigators “look forward” to seeing any information that would demonstrate President Donald Trump’s innocence.

“That remains,” the California Democrat said in an interview aired Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation” when asked by host Margaret Brennan whether she had seen any information that clears Trump of any wrongdoing in the Ukraine scandal.

“If he has information that is exculpatory … then we look forward to seeing it,” Pelosi added.

Oh, Nan! Donald Trump doesn’t have to prove his innocence. You and your partisan thugs on the Left have to prove that the President is guilty of “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors”. Beating Hillary Clinton, becoming President, and exposing the corruption of the Swamp don’t count.

Speaker Pelosi said pretty much the same thing two days before, when she “expertly trolled” President Trump, according to the Daily Kos. Here’s the video:

Nancy couldn’t get a spark if she rubbed two brain cells together, and she’s going to explain “exculpatory” to the President? By the way, Nancy, honey, Poligrip.

And then there is this from a USA Today article:

When asked about her statement Thursday that Trump appeared to have committed “bribery,” Pelosi explained she was translating the Latin phrase, “quid pro quo,” which has often been used in the case.

“I was translating from the Latin,” she said. “That was in the context of E Pluribus Unum. For many, one. And so I said for many, one. Quid pro quo. Bribery.”

What the heck does that word salad even mean? And doesn’t E Pluribus Unum mean “out of” or “from many one”? Other than the fact that one is a legal term and the other is on our money, the only thing these two have in common is that they are both Latin. Not one of the geniuses in the press pool there said, “Whatchu talkin’ bout, Nan?”

There is more than enough evidence to pronounce Nancy a partisan hack trying to overturn a Presidential election. Good luck with that, Nan.

Photo Credit: Pixabay.com/AJEL/Pixabay License