Men Not Needed At Ballot Boxes

Men Not Needed At Ballot Boxes

Men Not Needed At Ballot Boxes

Men? Who needs ’em? Apparently, New Mexico’s Democrat governor, Michelle Lujan Grisham, doesn’t.

The Democrat party has been hemorrhaging male voters for quite some time, emasculating them, even. Democrat women have been savage in their attempts to alienate men. It’s not just the angry blue-haired cat ladies who are doing this. It is now, also the lawmakers.

We’re good, she says.Michelle Lujan Grisham says male voters are not needed. There are enough meditating, yoga-pant-wearing, Chardonnay-drinking wine moms in Santa Fe collecting child support from their (male) ex-husbands, and septum-pierced, Funyun-eating stoners in the 505, yo, to carry The Land of Enchantment in future elections. Boys, step aside. Otherwise, you may get some ice-cold agua fría dumped on your crotch.

For at least twenty years, white males over 40 have been a concern for Democrats. Forget liberal men, forget black men, too, and focus on the Chardonnay-drinking Karens from the suburbs who watch too much Bravo and MS Now.”-Matt Vespa, TownHall

Define what a woman is, exactly, Michelle…

I’m sure with Pride month just around the corner, more “stunning and brave” men who claim to be women (but are still MEN) will show up in droves. So, Michelle? Psst-here’s a little tip for you. Yes, you still need the MEN.

Translation: we need more women to vote for men in women’s sports. We need more of these women to vote for men in women’s prisons. We need women to support men in women’s locker rooms and men, cosplaying as women, claiming they have periods and need abortions. Yes, this is EXACTLY what the Democratic Party-and the rest of the country needs. Out-of-touch, sheltered young, liberal women and angry, old Karens going to the ballot box and telling the men to stop “mansplaining” and stay the hell home. This is an excellent campaign strategy for elections to come, Michelle. Keep it up, girl. You’re good.

You don’t need no manly men with open-carry guns in the ABQ. You don’t need no policemen arresting the homeless drug addicts and mentally ill people on the city streets. All everyone, and everybody needs are their “neighbors with uteruses“, to quote Creepy James Talarico, to use her two legs and walk to the ballot box to make a better world. Sounds like Michelle Lujan Grisham has been smoking too much of the peyote.

Sounds like a suicide political move to me. Nevermind strength in numbers. The guys can just stay home and make the ladies a sandwich after they get home from a long, grueling day at the polls. This is a brilliant plan, if you ask me-for Republican men and women, alike.

I think the juncture we are at here reflects the Democrats’ obsession with identity politics entirely. When you base your vote on your gender, and your gender alone, this is what and WHO you get in office-a blowhard who is completely ineffective at policy, enforcing the rule of law and governing in general. Politicians who would rather posture and divide than bring unity and get things done.

Studies have illustrated over the years how the Democrats appealed to women by appealing to societal struggles such as healthcare (they’ve clumped birth-control abortions in here, strategically), education and salary gaps. Republicans appealed more to men by highlighting economic issues, national security and fiscal conservatism.

Grisham’s comments reflect a broader reality for Democrats. As women have become the party’s most reliable voting bloc, party strategists are searching for ways to attract men to their cause.”-Brecca Stoll, DailyWire

Hey, genius from the “education party”? You don’t attract them by telling them you don’t need them.

In truth, to vote effectively, both men and women must think outside of their gender bubble and look at America as a whole. They must not only think of themselves and their well-being, but at future generations and what our nation will look like for them. This is largely lost on the Democrats and, apparent in Lujan-Grisham’s statements.

We are a grass-roots blog of Conservative women. Men? We’ll tell you straight-up, right now, that we need you. You are loved and cherished and like us, have legs to walk to the ballot box and vote with your feet. And, if any liberal women happen to be reading this, here’s your chance to think with your brain and not your uterus. This needs to stop. You are so much more and better than this.

Photo Credit: United States Congress, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Written by

6 Comments
  • Lloyd says:

    You can bet that, in times of imminent physical danger, Grisham would be quick to hide behind the nearest male !!

  • SkillyBoo says:

    It’s not just the political emasculating of men, just watch commercials or television shows. Beta and clueless males are predominantly on display daily. a woefully underfed woman overpowering a male in movies, butch female ordering around an effete soy boy, a woman with a tool belt fixing something while her weakling male hands her the tools etc. The reality is apparent when you look at the female, male and other thing protestors. All have dyed hair and septum rings. The only real males are the ones wearing combat gear paid rioters creating mayhem and then stepping back letting the destruction and violence begin. Want proof just look at what’s going on in New Jersey. Even the beta male politicians are doing the paid protestors bidding.

  • Chad King says:

    Math is hard. In California, about 70% of the registered voters express a party preference–and about 64% are Democrats. 57% of the Democrats are women (at least according to ChatGPT). So if the 30% who don’t identify with a party are the same as the 70% who do, about 37% (57% of 64%) of the registered voters are Democrat women–they aren’t close to a lock. Maybe the Democrats should worry about appealing to the 63% of registered voters who aren’t female Democrats?

    It’s easy to lose sight of the fact that 38% of the California voters in 2024 voted for Trump. And that number almost certainly understates his support because Republicans have little incentive to vote in a heavily gerrymandered state that Harris was going to carry in any event. I’m glad to see the Republicans in Red States treating the 40% Democrat minority like California treats its Republican minority.

  • harleycowboy says:

    Of course she doesn’t want men voting. Women will vote for socialism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead