It’s Baseball, Not A Sexuality Workshop

It’s Baseball, Not A Sexuality Workshop

It’s Baseball, Not A Sexuality Workshop

Every June, Major League Baseball seems to lose sight of its professional sports identity and starts acting like a corporate HR department. This year’s controversy began when several San Francisco Giants players either wrote Genesis 9:12-16 on the Pride Night caps or declined to participate altogether.

MLB issued warnings. The Giants issued apologies. Politicians started firing off letters. Activists expressed outrage. Social media did what social media does.

The whole thing struck me as ridiculous for a very simple reason.

Why are we having this argument at a baseball game?

Baseball exists for people to enjoy watching pitchers throw 95-mile-per-hour fastballs. They enjoy watching home runs disappear into the stands. The sunshine, the overpriced hot dogs, and arguing about whether the manager should have pulled the starter an inning earlier. It’s America’s greatest pastime!

But don’t you know we can’t have regular, good old-fashioned entertainment and sports anymore without liberal progressives making everything sexualized. Why is baseball requiring themed celebrations centered on sexuality?

Why Is There A Pride Night For Baseball?

Nobody buys a ticket because the shortstop might be gay. And certainly nobody watches a double play and wishes baseball were less about baseball and more about social messaging. I can guarantee you no regular person is taking kids to the ballpark hoping to learn about anyone’s personal preferences in the bedroom.

We want a regular old baseball game without social justice bull. Yet, every year, professional sports leagues insist on turning games into awareness campaigns and corporate virtue-signaling exercises. WHY?


The question isn’t why some players opted out. The question is why Pride Night exists in the first place.

Voluntary, Except For The Part Where It Isn’t

The Giants insist participation was voluntary. In fact, the team’s statement specifically noted that players are free to make personal choices regarding Pride Night activities.

That sounds wonderful until you read the rest of the statement.

“The San Francisco Giants are proud to support Pride Night and the LGBTQ+ community,” the statement said. “Baseball should be a place where everyone feels welcome, respected, and valued. We also respect that individuals may make personal choices about participating in team activations. We understand that the choices by individual players have caused pain and anger to many in the LGBTQ+ community and we are sorry for that.”

“Those choices do not change our organization’s commitment to inclusion, belonging, and creating a welcoming environment for all,” the team closed. “We remain grateful to our fans, partners, employees, players, and coaches who help make Pride Night a meaningful celebration.” – The Daily Wire

After affirming the players’ right to choose, the Giants immediately apologized because some players made the “wrong” choice. The organization expressed regret for the “pain and anger” caused by players who either declined to participate or added Bible verses to their caps.

That raises an obvious question. If players are genuinely free to make personal choices, why is the organization apologizing when they do?

Apparently players are free to make their own choices. They just aren’t free from being publicly scolded when they make the wrong one.

The Bible Verse Emergency

Looking through MLB’s uniform rules, the league probably has a technical argument. The players wrote something on the cap, and the rulebook appears to prohibit that.

What interests me is not the rule itself but the sudden devotion to uniformity. MLB has spent years turning uniforms into platforms for causes, campaigns, celebrations, awareness initiatives, and social messaging. After all that, the league suddenly discovered the importance of keeping the cap exactly as issued when somebody added a Genesis reference.

The Bible verse didn’t create this controversy. Pride Night did.


Had there been no rainbow-themed cap, there would have been no Genesis verse written beside it and no national argument over baseball hats.

A Modest Proposal

Here is my revolutionary idea.

The Giants already have a logo. It doesn’t need a seasonal political makeover every June. Let the pitcher pitch, the batter bat, and the fans spend twenty dollars on a hot dog while complaining about the umpire.

Professional baseball does not need a sexuality-themed celebration. It does not need competing statements, corporate apologies, activist outrage, or congressional involvement.

It already has a purpose. The purpose is baseball.

Feature Image: AI-generated illustration.

Written by

Delivering blunt conservative takes on politics and pop culture—guiding the next generation with wit, wisdom, and straight truth. Reviving patriotism.

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead