Who would want a man like this?

Who would want a man like this?

Who would want a man like this?

I made a huge mistake today. I pulled up something on Tumblr called “Power Femme Posts.” I wish I could say hilarity ensued, but it was more like vomit. Lots and lots of vomit.

I’m not much of a Tumblr junkie. As a matter of fact, when I was looking for the site, I misspelled “tumblr” as “tumbler.” Google corrected me, because I’m apparently not woke enough for this shit, so I was able to find this site. WHY, OH WHY???

This feed is filled with nothing but third-wave feminist garbage – the kind of trash true feminists like Camille Paglia view like they would something smelly on the bottom of their shoe.

Respect the power of the vagina!

You will consider us attractive no matter how repulsive, weird, inappropriate tattooed, pierced, rainbow-haired, obese, or otherwise heinous we are!

We don’t need to prove ourselves worthy; the mere fact that we have a hairy snatch between our legs (because dog forbid we actually groom – grooming is a sign of patriarchal oppression) makes us worthy!

And this.

What woman in her right mind would want this subservient, pathetic, docile excuse for a man in her life? And why?

I nearly threw up when I saw this sad excuse for a man kneeling at the feet of this snotty excuse for a female, who is supposed to consider herself to be the dominant personality in the relationship! Why would ANYONE call this crawling, scraping, obsequious creature a man?

The problem with these third-wave feminist shrews is that they don’t want equality. They don’t want to be acknowledged for their skills, prowess, and accomplishments. They merely want to wield power over men – nothing more.

Surfing through this Femme Power forest of inadequacy, I saw nothing about intellectual pursuits, nothing about actual accomplishments (other than the vagina between their legs), and nothing about hard work or paying your dues.

What I saw was a metaphorical daisy chain of mediocrities, stroking one another’s egos and delusions of grandeur, while putting down their male counterparts and fantasizing about the day they take over.

As a woman, I’m sickened by this!

I raised two kids, mostly as a single parent after my divorce. My husband and I met when my kids were already teenagers, and he provided a steady, fun, rational male presence in their lives, because their father had lost interest after he found his current piece of ass. I will admit I make more than my husband does. I work longer hours. I’ve worked my knuckles raw to get where I am in life, and I deserve everything I have accomplished.

But never – EVER – would I expect my husband to exhibit the kind of wretched servility we see in this photo!

This isn’t a man! This is a spineless, submissive invertebrate with MAYBE a penis between its legs! I wouldn’t be interested enough to find out, frankly, because this sad excuse for a male doesn’t deserve a strong, independent woman.

Here’s what these women just don’t get.

You don’t become strong by hobbling those who are stronger than you. You’re still an inadequate weakling, but now you’re a despicable one as well, because you’ve destroyed another merely to build yourself up – not by your accomplishments, but by brute force.

You don’t become any less of a pathetic mediocrity by crippling those around you who aren’t. It’s an illusion that will eventually blow up in your face, when you realize that you still don’t have the skills necessary to create, build, and improve the world around you, but you have driven away those who do.

You don’t become a provider by subjugating your significant other, nor do you become a protector by forcing that naked, groveling amoeba into submission.

And if you’re a man, who is so scared to lose a woman that you would allow it to happen, you don’t deserve your place in the household, other than at the feet of an obese, rainbow-haired, overly-pierced non-entity, whose only “accomplishment” is to shame you into burying your self esteem, hating your own intelligence and skills, and loathing your own masculinity.

Maybe there are women out there who like this perverse version of a man, and whose fragile ego can only tolerate a groveling parasite as a mate. Maybe these women are so lacking in skill, strength, intelligence, and self-esteem, that the only way they can feel good about themselves is to subjugate men into the spineless, loathsome amoeba you see in that graphic.

As for me…

No thanks.

I’d rather live alone, surrounded by a multitude of cats and doilies, than spend my life with the oily invertebrate that arrogant shrew appears to have tamed in that picture.

Written by

Marta Hernandez is an immigrant, writer, editor, science fiction fan (especially military sci-fi), and a lover of freedom, her children, her husband and her pets. She loves to shoot, and range time is sacred, as is her hiking obsession, especially if we’re talking the European Alps. She is an avid caffeine and TWD addict, and wants to own otters, sloths, wallabies, koalas, and wombats when she grows up.

  • Kevin says:

    ” I pulled up something on Tumblr called “Power Femme Posts.” ”


  • Cindy C. says:

    I’ve been saying a lot lately that today’s “feminist” doesn’t want equality, she wants the upper hand. And with the way society belittles men these days, she will probably get what she wants. Which makes me sad, because all that does is guarantee generations of more spineless males.

    Great post!

    • GWB says:

      That’s what *all* of the “rights” and “equality” groups are really after. They’re not after equality and actual rights, they’re after power. It’s been that way since sometime around the Civil Rights Act. (While some of the politicians working on the CRA were after equality, some number were after power – and it shows.)

    • TBlakely says:

      I doubt that the number of spineless men will increase rather the number of men disinterested in families and women in general will increase. There is a reason that many women loath porn and it has nothing to do with ‘objectifying’ and everything to do with devaluing what’s in between their legs. The hilarity will really ensue in about 10-20 years when sexbots become more lifelike and appealing. Lol, feminists are already raging against the current generation of crude, creepy sexbots.

      • Windy Wilson says:

        I agree. Further, MGTOW is the modern version of Lysistrata, one sex going on strike by withholding what the other sex wants to attempt to stop stupid activities. If men appear to be afraid to commit today, it is because they fear that their intended won’t respect the commitment they make as much as they do.

  • GWB says:

    The thing to grasp is that feminists claim/believe* that men kept women subjugated for centuries, so it’s only fair that be turned on its head. It ignores nature and the actual evidence, but they’ve never really been about truth – mostly about power.

    While feminists like to claim marriage chained women, they ignore that it chained men, as well. Men, given their druthers, would walk away from troublesome relationships. Social, religious and legal strictures inherent in marriage kept them where they would continue to be the husband/father, with all that entails.

    While some men did abuse those strictures, plenty of women did too. The only difference is generally found in the physicality of the abuse (men get physical, women get … verbally and emotionally abusive**). But ‘henpecked’ men were certainly just as chained into an abusive relationship – sometimes with less legal recourse.

    (* Some know it’s false, some merely believe their progressive indoctrination.)
    (** Trying to avoid a common derogatory word here…..)

  • Timmy says:

    Feminism is a female supremacy movement and they do want their men like that or dead.

    Google “julie bindel, shoot all men.

  • GTB says:

    BDSM isn’t for everyone.

  • Bob says:

    This is a fetish site…not to be taken so seriously. These are guys who are into humiliation in bdsm sex. Not my cup of tea but not a serious proposal for real life,

  • Pat Riarchy says:

    OK, sure. I get that the guy is subordinate, but I also realize he’s surely a professional model, making money. And he’s probably gay anyway.

  • Scarlett says:

    You know, this is funny and all, but sometimes I think if y’all didn’t study these weird things, no one would. If I happen to see an image like this in internet-land, I barely even notice it. You probably put more time and thought into this piece than the person did who “created” what you were piecing about.

  • Pam says:

    Thirty years ago the “equality” ruse was revealed to me. It became apparent to me at 25 that these women were not at all interested in “equality”. What they envied was their perception of male power. They equated going to meetings, answering the phone and working 70 hours a week outside the home with the aggregation of power.
    They equated having a baby, caring for it and the home 70 hours a week with weakness. And so we have had 30 years of their valuing working your ass off in your wonderful, rewarding career by going to meetings, talking on the phone and working outside your home for 70 hours with fulfillment and having some kids and nurturing them to successful adulthood as a waste of your time. In reality most of us work our asses off in non-professional jobs where we barely make enough money to feed our children. We are married to men who have the same situation or worse are not married but involved with men who don’t work. Many of us are going solo without a man in our lives who is a partner and helper financially or any other way. They sold my generation on the old you can have it all, when in reality working and raising children involve optimally two people dividing all that up. I regret not having more children. I don’t regret not attending more meetings and making more money.

    • Timmy says:


      if you could go to schools and give a lecture to young girls…

      • Windy Wilson says:

        … there would be demonstrations against you, your words would be called hate speech, you would receive death threats, the heckler’s veto would be seen as fair if it were directed at you.

  • Hillary Clinton says:


  • CJ says:

    A man needs a feminist woman like a fish needs to be gutted, filleted, battered, deep-fried, and served with lemon and tartar sauce.

  • Chris says:

    Why can’t more women be like Marta?

  • nofreelunch says:

    Politics, at its base, is divided between those who want to control others, and those who have no such desire.
    -Robert Heinlein
    Yes, it’s all about POWER!

  • Yentl McFarvelstein says:

    How about letting men be and do whatever they want for a change?

    First, men are harped on endlessly by the Feminist Harridan Corps. for being part of “The Patriarchy”. Now, they’re labelled as “spineless, submissive, invertebrates” by strong, independent, traditionalist (loudmouth) shrews if they go any other route (often because they were browbeaten endlessly by a single mother and teachers who happened to be a officers in the aforementioned Corps.)

    Either way, men are treated like livestock, as in “Keep pulling that load just the way I say, Boy.”

    Thanks, but no thanks.

    Here’s an idea. Aggressively police your own ranks, first, women.

  • John says:

    I stayed in a loveless marriage, as the sole provider, because of our son. When his Mother finally, at the urging of her Mother, started to abuse him, she was removed from our house, I was granted custody in, and at his wishes, I transferred in my company back to where he grew-up.

    These feminists and their subservient males deserve each other. They are useless parasites on society, and as PC is defeated, they will have no means of support. They will get their just reward. Strong women deserve strong men.

  • Dantheman says:

    No one…it’s about a male fantasy about humiliation and loss of control. This is a fetish site, not a political one.

    • Marta Hernandez says:

      So I’m reading the comments on this, and I’m floored at how many people claim it’s a fetish site, and how many of y’all know all about these fetishes! LOL!!!

      It didn’t strike me as a “fetish” site, BTW. There was entirely too much weirdly political crap intermingled with GRRRRRL POWER stuff.

      If it is, indeed, a fetish site, then Poe’s law is at play here, because a whole lot of prog women I know spout exactly this stuff in a serious manner.

      • GWB says:

        I know more about … certain things than I thought I ever would.
        What’s amazing is how much of it is subject to (and informative of) solid critical thinking and decent analysis of human nature. (Some of it is still baffling, even then.) The fetishists are often just an extreme form of something very normal.

        (BTW, being online in almost any virtual world will have you meeting up with ALL sorts of people that you would otherwise never chat with. And a lot of them are pretty open. Anonymity leads to openness. If you don’t encounter those folks in a virtual world, you’re working hard at isolating yourself.)

  • Manual Paleologos says:

    {SHRUG} Some men want to be dominant. Others want to be submissive. That’s their choice.

    Meanwhile, I’m a straight White cis Male. The whole world is my urinal. Now go make me a sandwich, girl.

  • Flying Dutchman says:

    A couple of things:

    1. Yes, Tumblr (autocorrect let the spelling stand!) is a sex site.

    2. Having said this, this sort of thing is one reason why MGTOW has taken off so quickly.

    • Windy Wilson says:

      MGTOW is the result of perceive differences in how long term promises are respected by men and women. And for every “not all women are like that”, there’s at least that many “not all men are like that”. The difference is that speakers of the latter are considered sexist and liars.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner