Previous post
Apparently, we need to talk about Tucker Carlson running for president in 2028. Not because he’s announced he’s running or that there’s an actual third party. And certainly not because anyone has printed the bumper stickers yet. But the political analysts and pundits have decided this hypothetical ticket deserves serious consideration, complete with polling, predictions, and warnings about what it could do to the Grand Old Party. So here we are.
Well, that escalated quickly. Barely a week after Tucker Carlson and his merry band of Trump dissenters announced that the movement has begun, the chatterati are already gaming out a third-party presidential ticket for 2028, starring none other than Tucker Carlson. He has already laid out his 10-point manifesto, so apparently we’re all past the spitballing stage.
Joe Kent has been floated as possible running mate, Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) is never far from the conservation. That is, between $5,000 Cameos and whatever else she’s hawking this week.
Marjorie Taylor Greene: “We are in an economic crisis.”
Marjorie Taylor Greene five seconds later: “For only $5,000, I’ll record a Cameo for you.”
😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/A4nPXEBpO9
— Gina Milan (@ginamilan_) August 6, 2026
And suddenly we are discussing an election that’s still two years away as though Tucker has already won the Iowa caucuses. Lord have mercy. It’s going to be a long two years.
“The Kent, Tucker, etc. ticket takes equal percentages of partisans but hurts the GOP more because they take more GOP-leaning indies than DEM-leaning indies,” Big Data Poll Director Rich Baris said.
[…]Pollster Mark Mitchell, formerly of Rasmussen Reports, opined on Friday that the Carlson/Greene coalition represented them understanding the changing values of younger voters.
“Boomers have their PRINCIPLES (capitalism, democracy, conservatism). But the 4th turning tells us that youth will take over and rebuild society on a new set of VALUES (fairness, peace, prosperity, etc.),” he said. “Tucker fired the first shot of the 4th turning because he understands this.”
The idea of a Carlson-led presidential ticket focusing on non-intervention is not entirely new, either. Pundits have suggested since the start of the war that such a ticket would upend political norms.
“A Tucker Carlson / Joe Kent ticket would steamroll anything Democrats or Republicans could bring,” commentator Mike Cernovich said in March. – Just The News
Steamroll? Good grief. We’ve somehow skipped right over forming a party, finding candidates and winning voters and gone directly to President Tucker Carlson.
Can we perhaps establish that there is an actual party before we hand the man the White House?
Is there something actually happening here? Sure, I guess I shouldn’t roll my eyes too much. Yes, some voters are concerned about the Iran War, or at least how it’s being handled (raises hand). Some voters believe Donald Trump has strayed from what they thought America First meant. Those same voters believe the Trump administration is spending too much time focused on foreign issues and not enough on problems here at home.
But dealing with foreign affairs is part of the job. Since when did America First mean America Only? And when exactly did we lose the ability to walk and chew gum at the same time?
If you want to hear a case for this from someone who actually likes the idea, here you go. The host is decidedly pro-Tucker and pretty enthusiastic about the possibility of a new populist party. He walks through Carlson’s agenda, agrees with most of it, and argues that a coalition of populists from both right and left could actually make this thing work. Give it a listen, because what he says later is far more interesting.
And there it is. Even someone rooting for this thing admits that without some massive left-right coalition, A Tucker Carlson third-party run could simply peel off a chunk of the conservative vote and help put a Democrat in the White House.
Which brings me to the idea I really don’t want to entertain.
I’ve never been much of a conspiracy theorist. But somewhere around 2020, the phrase “oh, nobody would ever do that” lost a whole lot of its persuasive power with me. These days, I don’t automatically assume anything is too ridiculous, too calculated, or too politically convenient to at least ask the question.
So, fine. I’ll ask it.
What if helping elect a Democrat isn’t an unfortunate side effect of this whole thing? What if, for some of the people pushing it, blowing up the Republican coalition is the point?
I don’t have evidence that’s what’s happening. But when supporters themselves are openly talking about siphoning conservative votes, punishing the Republican Party, and building a strange left-right coalition, I’m at least willing to raise an eyebrow.
And now that I’ve wandered this far down the rabbit hole, we might as well talk about the psyop.
What if we’re all being played here? Not necessarily by Tucker Carlson and company, but by the entire political machine surrounding them. Announce a movement. Float Tucker for president. Poll the hypothetical ticket. Warn Republicans that it could cost them the White House. Write stories about those warnings. Get everyone arguing about whether Tucker could win. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Before long, something that barely exists starts looking like a legitimate political force simply because everyone keeps telling us how much it might matter.
Maybe there’s no conspiracy here at all. Maybe it’s just politics, punditry and the internet doing what they do best: turning speculation into reality one headline at a time.
Either way, I’m not ready to panic about President Tucker Carlson.
Ask me again when there’s an actual party.
Feature Image: AI-generated illustration.
Leave a Reply