Technicality Prevents Justice For Kate Steinle

Technicality Prevents Justice For Kate Steinle

Technicality Prevents Justice For Kate Steinle

Justice for Kate Steinle and her family was thrown out yesterday based on a technicality. Steinle was walking on a San Francisco pier with her father when she was shot and killed in 2015.

A California state appeals court Friday overturned the lone conviction against Jose Inez Garcia-Zaratea, a undocumented (illegal) immigrant who shot and killed Kate Steinle on the San Francisco waterfront in 2015. The 1st District Court of Appeal in San Francisco overturned that conviction because the judge failed to give the jury the option of acquitting Garcia-Zarate on the theory he only possessed the weapon for a moment.

Garcia-Zarate claimed he unwittingly picked up the gun, which was wrapped in a T-shirt, and it fired accidentally.

“Accidentally?” Really? The man just so happens to find a gun in a t-shirt and fires it off. He then throws it in the water because it took him by surprise. Yep. He’s “innocent”-despite his rap sheet:

Garcia-Zarate’s criminal history includes seven prior felonies for possession of heroin, marijuana and other drugs dating back to 1993, as well as felonies for illegal re-entry back into the United States. Five times.

On March 26, 2015, Garcia-Zarate finished a 46-month federal sentence in Los Angeles, but was sent to San Francisco for a felony warrant for marijuana and released April 15, 2015.

Now, the court is “questioning” Garcia Zarate’s possession and firing off of said t-shirt-wrapped weapon.

These questions go to the heart of the momentary possession defense. The fact the jury asked whether there was a time requirement for possession suggests jurors were wrestling with how long [the] defendant had the gun.”-Justice Sandra Margulies

But fear not, good law-abiding, legal citizens. Garcia-Zarate is still in federal custody and *may* face other charges. Even though a city’s so-called sanctuary policy and San Francisco County Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi bore responsibility for Steinle’s death. Even though three months before the killing, Garcia-Zarate was released from custody after a drug case against him was dropped. Even though the sheriff’s office in this case, which had ended contact between jail employees and immigration officials, ignored a request by federal authorities to hold Garcia-Zarate until they could assume custody did not inform them that he was being released. Jose Inez Garcia-Zarate is just another “justice involved” person on the streets of the sanctuary pit we know of as San Francisco.

While the court springs Garcia-Zarate from a conviction due to questions regarding “momentary possession” of the weapon that killed Kate Steinle, he is still is eating three meals a day on our dime, Kate Steinle is still dead and her family and loved ones are still mourning her loss. It all makes me wonder what would happen if any of us claim to be innocent should we shoot an intruder coming into our home. Could we claim that we were “unsure” what we should do with a weapon that just happened to end up in our hands? “Sorry, Your Honor, I did not realize my gun safe was open and I fired off my weapon which just happened to hit the intruder in the chest?” Would any of us get off this easily? Would a jury wrestle with this decision in our defense?

My guess is the judge in our case wouldn’t buy this. Unless we were illegals who attempted to enter this country four more times after being deported. Then, the judge and jury will “wrestle” with their decisions to drop our conviction on a technicality. Unbelievable and disgusting.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons/Gianluca Cogoli [CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)]

Written by

6 Comments
  • Nocturnal says:

    They were already importing a dependency underclass to shout the citizenry down at the ballot box.

    Do they now intend to permit the same, to gun the citizenry down in the streets?

    How soon the backlash?

  • Charles N. Steele says:

    Garcia Zarate has also been denied justice.

  • CaptDMO says:

    That Mr. Zarate was in the country illegally to become the “finder” of the weapon is of no debate.
    The ricochet aspect negates intention.
    That he was let free, and not even MINIMALLY deposited in (eg)the Southern tip of South America …

  • Kodos the Excutioner says:

    In a just world; and the America I grew up believing in…
    – this illegal alien scum
    – the “federal employee” who lost this weapon
    – this so-called “judge”

    All would face justice. Preferably at the hands of Ms. Steinle’s male relatives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead
Instagram