Ron Hager’s Warped View of the Holocaust

Ron Hager’s Warped View of the Holocaust

Ron Hager’s Warped View of the Holocaust

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has been garnering the wrong type of attention recently, because a professor teaching “21st Century Wellness” – a class that’s apparently a requirement for graduation from the hallowed halls of UNC – is using a textbook which claims that the Jews during the Holocaust “did not tap into the strength that comes from their intrinsic worth succumbed to the brutality to which they were subjected.” Ron Hager’s book, which he cowrote, and which he’s apparently forcing students to purchase for his class, thereby putting money in his own pocket, is by several accounts oversimplified, superficial garbage, as is his alleged “understanding” of the underlying causes of the Holocaust.

The Holocaust apparently happened because the Jews “”did not tap into the strength that comes from their intrinsic worth succumbed to the brutality to which they were subjected.” Read that to mean that the Jews simply made the wrong choices regarding their health and wellness, and had they had a bit more self  esteem…

Errr, what?

I can’t even write this with a straight face!

And I’m not the only one who thinks this is utter dreck.

Ryan Holmes, who took a Lifetime Fitness weight training course last fall, was one of a number of students who criticized the book.

“Some of the stuff they said seemed almost like pseudoscience, and it kind of blurred the lines between what I recognized to be real factual information and things that may or may not be true. It put a lot of emphasis on the connection between mental and physical health, more than normal,” he said. “I thought that it was an oversimplification that didn’t account for situational factors.”

Smart kid, that Ryan Holmes.

Another student, Skye Golann, criticized the text as having put “extreme emphasis on personal responsibility for health, without enough exploration of societal factors for bad health, such as poverty and lack of access to medicine.”

There seems to be a common thread in students’ criticism of the textbook – the fact that Hager failed to put choices and personal responsibility into context when discussing wellness.

Nowhere is that oversimplification more obvious than in Hager’s superficial understanding – if you can even call it that – of the history of the Holocaust and the factors that led to the systematic murder of Jews, as well as so many others. This dude has the intellectual depth of a teaspoon, and I’m being generous.

Now, Hager is partially correct when he says that the Jews didn’t tap into their inner strength that comes from their intrinsic worth. What Hager is missing, though, are the reasons for this alleged “failure” – the fact that years of Nazi propaganda painting Jews as ugly, as worthless, as exploiting the Germans, and as vermin on this very earth, as well as systematic abuse, theft of their property, and the infringement on their fundamental civil rights served to erode the Jews’ collective self esteem, to denigrate their culture, and to destroy that inner strength that they needed so badly to resist.

Nazi propaganda about the Jews permeated every facet of mass media, art, music, theater, film, books, radio, school books, and the press.

German children read an anti-Jewish propaganda book titled DER GIFTPILZ ( “The Poisonous Mushroom”). The girl on the left holds a companion volume, the translated title of which is “Trust No Fox.” Germany, ca. 1938. (Source record ID: E39 Nr .2381/5)
— Stadtarchiv Nürnberg


Illustration from a German antisemitic children’s book titled “Trust No Fox in the Green Meadow and No Jew on his Oath” (translation from German). The headlines depicted in the image say “Jews are our misfortune” and “How the Jew cheats.” Germany, 1936.
— US Holocaust Memorial Museum


This image originates from a film produced by the Reich Propaganda Ministry. It is captioned: “A moral and religious conception of life demands the prevention of hereditarily ill offspring.” Nazi propaganda aimed to create public support for the compulsory sterilization effort.
— US Holocaust Memorial Museum

Of course, the very basic Jewish cultural identity was impacted by the constant barrage of Nazi filth!

Wouldn’t yours be?

Much like victims of domestic abuse, the Jews – who are some of society’s most law-abiding citizens by their very nature – exhibited characteristics of abuse victims.

There was embarrassment, there was shame, there was fear, the Jews’ very nature as law-abiding citizens precluded them from disobeying the onerous laws the Nazis passed to ensure they were relegated to the gutters of society and disarmed to ensure that they could not fight back. A sense of loyalty precluded many of them from leaving, and their collective self esteem was shredded by years of Nazi abuse.

By fall of 1938, the Nazis were ratcheting up measures to expropriate the assets of Jews. To ensure that they had no means of resistance, the Jews were ordered to surrender their firearms.

…While no law prohibited a Jew from owning guns, the report recited the Nazi mantra: “Jews in possession of weapons are a danger to the German people.”…

This scenario took place all over Germany — firearms were confiscated from all Jews registered as gun owners. As this was occurring, a wholly irrelevant event provided just the excuse needed to launch a violent attack on the Jewish community: A Polish teenager who was Jewish shot a German diplomat in Paris. The stage was set to instigate Kristallnacht, a carefully orchestrated Nazi onslaught against the entire Jewish community in Germany that horrified the world and even the German public.

Under the pretense of searching for weapons, Jewish homes were vandalized, businesses ransacked and synagogues burned. Jews were terrorized, beaten and killed. Orders were sent to shoot anyone who resisted.

This is what Hager doesn’t acknowledge as he basks in his American privilege, never having dealt with such brutality on a large scale. This is what Hager fails to understand when he implies that the Jews were somehow responsible for what happened to him. This is Hager’s failing, and he is trying to pass this superficial, arrogant, privileged ignorance on to his students.

What Hager doesn’t recognize is that when the identity of an entire population is weakened, it becomes easier to abuse and further degrade them.

Films in particular played an important role in disseminating racial antisemitism, the superiority of German military power, and the intrinsic evil of the enemies as defined by Nazi ideology. Nazi films portrayed Jews as “subhuman” creatures infiltrating Aryan society. For example, The Eternal Jew (1940), directed by Fritz Hippler, portrayed Jews as wandering cultural parasites, consumed by sex and money. Some films, such as The Triumph of the Will (1935) by Leni Riefenstahl, glorified Hitler and the National Socialist movement. Two other Riefenstahl works, Festival of the Nations and Festival of Beauty (1938), depicted the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games and promoted national pride in the successes of the Nazi regime at the Olympics.

If Hager thinks this systematic abuse of an entire population doesn’t impact the people’s national identity and their ability to tap into that inner strength he so loves to promote, he shouldn’t be teaching ANY class, especially not anything having to do with wellness!

I haven’t taken his class, and I haven’t read his book, but if the goal of UNC-Chapel Hill is to ensure that the university releases well-adjusted, mature, individuals, able to overcome challenges and make choices to live healthy lives, this book and this class sound like abject failures.

Written by

Marta Hernandez is an immigrant, writer, editor, science fiction fan (especially military sci-fi), and a lover of freedom, her children, her husband and her pets. She loves to shoot, and range time is sacred, as is her hiking obsession, especially if we’re talking the European Alps. She is an avid caffeine and TWD addict, and wants to own otters, sloths, wallabies, koalas, and wombats when she grows up.

  • CaptDMO says:

    Some of the shallowest entryism dreck for “defending” Socialist/Communist “bait”, and “critical thinking” defending
    unearned special exception , I’ve seen since a Gloria Allred, Michael Avenatti, or Al Sharpton “presser”.

    • Marta Hernandez says:

      Not sure I’m following you. Maybe I haven’t had my coffee yet, so I don’t get what you’re saying here.

  • ^Hoonie Rain Bat^ says:

    Some educated derelict’s view on history doesn’t make it official. Remember he has some ca$h to make.

  • History Lessons Not from Teevee says:

    Besides excluding them from public life and having their brownshirts shame any Germans who shopped at Jewish shops what else did the Nazis do in the early to mid 1930s?
    They took the gun ownership rights away from “non-Aryans” after the National Socialists came to power in 1933. So it doesn’t matter how mentally tough you are when there is no access to weapons so you can battle your enemy with at least a 50/50 chance.
    The 1944 Warsaw ghetto uprising showed what was possible with weapons. Stalin just stopped his armies outside of Warsaw until the members of the Jewish Resistance were all killed because he feared they would be a thorn in his side as well.

  • GWB says:

    A much better take down of the book than the previous attempt.
    However, it still doesn’t provide full quotes from the book that demonstrate this claimed idiocy. Is there no one that actually has a copy of the book that can quote it when criticizing it?

    The bit about the Holocaust and mental strength is from a Holocaust survivor, BTW, not directly from Hager.
    About Frankl [the Holocaust survivor], the book says: “He realized deep down that his life had meaning no matter how inhumanely he was being treated by his captors. The people in the camps who did not tap into the strength that comes from recognizing their intrinsic worth succumbed to the brutality to which they were subjected.”
    The first sentence there is an incredibly valid point, and one conservatives should strive to make constantly in our battle against nihilism and its consequences (like abortion).
    The second is possibly true (likely true of many), but also probably overly broad. It isn’t inherently unjustified to say that, however. (And, Marta, your post here actually supports the statement, but gives it meaning by giving some background. Of course, since everyone seems to be quoting just that one or two sentences, we have no idea if the book gives that statement any more meaning or not.)

    That CNN article plays this victimology crap:
    which blames Holocaust victims for failing to tap into their strength
    That isn’t what the sentences say at all, and CNN twists it in order to do their standard BS outrage shtick of “you’re blaming the victim!” Haven’t we argued on this very blog that stating “You know, Sally, you should really stay out of that part of town at this time of night” is NOT blaming the victim?! That’s the crap twist CNN is giving it. And that’s just the lede paragraph!

    I really doubt this professors view of the Holocaust is as warped as everyone is making it out to be. It sure sounds like every other tempest-in-a-teapot the media likes to whip the twit mobs up with, though.

    • Marta Hernandez says:

      Here’s the thing, though. I did caveat my post by saying I haven’t read the book. But at the same time, I’m not just basing my assessment on the one quote, but also on what a couple of students have said about a lack of context and the superficiality of the text. There have been thousands of texts written about the Holocaust, and unless one provides the context for the quote, which I actually said I agreed with, the picture that’s painted is incomplete – especially in a wellness class.

      Just my opinion, of course. 🙂

  • Raviv says:

    As a survivors’ son, my thought was the Jews observed what was happening until 1938 -when the Nazis started invading Europe– was just a continuation of pogroms and other persecutions from the previous century. They could not see themselves as prospective mass murder targets in the then enlightened cities of EU. Very much the same as today survivors of terrorist attacks in Europe and US, what could they do? Not continue their routines? Religious prejudice and inadequate set of morals and manners… that allowed the Nazis to kill them. Many bright minds saw what was coming and left, some like my father were hidden by locals, the rest perished.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner