No Criminal Charges: FBI Director Comey Gives Hillary Clinton Get Out Of Jail Free Card [VIDEO]

No Criminal Charges: FBI Director Comey Gives Hillary Clinton Get Out Of Jail Free Card [VIDEO]

No Criminal Charges: FBI Director Comey Gives Hillary Clinton Get Out Of Jail Free Card [VIDEO]

Teflon Hillary strikes again. Somehow, in spite of the preponderance of evidence; the FBI has determined that the case against Hillary Clinton isn’t such a big deal after all. That’s according to FBI Director James Comey this morning.

You can read the full text of his prepared statement here. A few key points to consider from this morning’s announcement.

1. Comey was very quick to emphasize that NO ONE in the Administration had any knowledge of what he was going to say during the press conference. Uh sure….

2. It wasn’t just ONE server. It was MULTIPLE servers.

3. The amount of classified emails that Hillary actually sent and received is beyond appalling.


Yes, you read the above correctly. And make no mistake – she KNEW she was throwing classified information around on insecure server platforms. She KNEW it and didn’t care.

"Hmmm.... this one is marked 'sooper seekrit,' so I'll read it last."
“Hmmm…. this one is marked ‘sooper seekrit,’ so I’ll read it last.”

4. Several thousand additional work emails showed up during the FBI’s investigation. Several thousand. Not just one or two…but THOUSAND.

"I took care of the emails, Huma.... "
“I took care of the emails, Huma…. “

5. She did get a slap on the wrist…kind of.

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” he said.

“extremely careless??!!!” Hillary didn’t INTEND to violate laws???!! Oh REALLY. So setting up multiple servers, using multiple devices, and refusing to use State Department email address exclusively was what?? A minor transgression?? Oh wait – it was a mistake.

Very good question!!

Yep. Can we say double standards? I’ve written quite a bit about this entire Hillary email/server issue and how dangerous her actions have been to American interests here and abroad. And guess what?

We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.

She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

Possible?? Oh no, I’d say its highly likely. However, in spite of all that, the FBI will not advise criminal charges and has punted the case over to the Justice Department. Where Attorney General Lynch, fresh of the heels of a super secret airplane confab with Bill, has a decision to make. I wonder what the over/under is on Lynch running away from pressing charges of any kind?

Finally, Andrew McCarthy over at NRO’s The Corner makes an excellent point. Basically in order to not prosecute when they should, the FBI rewrote the law. Comey stated that any “reasonable prosecutor” wouldn’t be able to make a case. McCarthy believes a good prosecutor would immediately ask the following:

Why did Congress criminalize the mishandling of classified information through gross negligence? The answer, obviously, is to prevent harm to national security. So then the reasonable prosecutor asks: Was the statute clearly violated, and if yes, is it likely that Mrs. Clinton’s conduct caused harm to national security? If those two questions are answered in the affirmative, I believe many, if not most, reasonable prosecutors would feel obliged to bring the case.

Others have been thrown into jail for less. Others have been fired and lost their security clearances.


I couldn’t agree more.

There you have it ladies and gentlemen. Fact of the matter is, Hillary and her groupies were not just careless or grossly negligent. Hillary circumvented the laws and regulations in place on purpose. She deliberately lied to us and firmly believes she is above the law, and now the FBI has further cemented that belief. Is this REALLY who we want for President?

Written by

  • GWB says:

    One wag asked “How is it possible that a busy person – one with a really important job – could possibly have 50% of the email on their (supposedly) work account be “personal”? They are obviously not spending time doing the work we’re paying them to do.

    Comey’s body language told me that he was going to read his statement rote, and he wasn’t particularly invested in it.

    Excellent point by McCarthy. If I were Petraeus (and not a Hillary hack, like he appears to be) I would be suing to the SCOTUS to have my conviction thrown out. After all, the director of the FBI just said that no reasonable prosecutor would have indicted him. Obviously his prosecution was irrational (and therefore without cause) and should be vacated.

    For Comey to say there was no intent to violate the law (and gov’t regulations) is prima facie FALSE.

    We have just crossed the rubicon from any remaining “rule of law” into a pure aristocracy/oligarchy. Time to switch boxes, if you love the country our Founding Fathers set loose 240 years ago.

  • J walter says:

    Feminism wins. Did anyone really believe she would be charged?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner