As Gavin Newsom scrambles to keep is congenital Presidential ambitions alive, his ‘First Partner’, Barbie Jennifer Seibel, is drawing such negative attention that even Democrats aren’t buying the OrangeManBad excuse.

A sizable share of Democrats support the federal probe into California Gov. Gavin Newsom and his wife as the duo claims President Donald Trump is directing a politically motivated attack against them, a new survey shows.

A Daily Mail/JL Partners poll found 27% of Democrats support the probe into California’s first couple, with 14% saying they “somewhat support” the investigation and 13% saying they “strongly support” it.

Fresh off the OysterFührer fiasco, Gavin’s own issues now coupled with funny money shenanigans by AWFL Jennifer is drawing shade over this plastic, glitter couple whose ambition for the White House shows little bounds.

Siebel Newsom and her husband are now facing a federal criminal probe, which is said to be focusing in part on Siebel Newsom’s taxes, her charities, and her for-profit documentary company, all of which are interwoven in a complex skein that up until now has largely evaded serious scrutiny. Though the probe began when former president Joe Biden was in office, Gavin Newsom has publicly called the investigation a baseless Trump-driven political prosecution of him and his wife. On Thursday, Politico reported that the Newsoms have hired Abbe Lowell, who also represents several other Democratic figures who are facing criminal investigations or charges by the Trump Justice Department.

Siebel Newsom herself appeared Friday on MS NOW to address the investigation, telling the news personality Stephanie Ruhle that the probe is “a fishing expedition” carried out “in typical Trump fashion” and that she and her husband have “nothing to hide.”

Fishing expedition?

Siebel Newsom is unusual for a documentary filmmaker in that she’s handsomely compensated for her work. Documentaries are a field that is known to generate little profit, even if they are hits on streaming services.

But since Gavin Newsom took office as governor of California in 2019, the Representation Project has paid his wife upwards of $1.8 million. Siebel Newsom has drawn $913,000 in direct salary from the organization. In that same timeframe, the charity paid an additional $923,000 to Siebel Newsom through her for-profit production company, Girls Club Entertainment, for her documentary writing, producing, and directing services. Since 2019, the Representation Project has reported $2.4 million in total film production expenses, indicating that the films are made on a shoestring budget and Siebel Newsom’s compensation appears to have consumed much of the charity’s production budget.

Siebel Newsom has her husband’s administration to thank for steering revenue and eyeballs to her documentaries. In 2019, Newsom’s Department of Education recommended public schools screen them in California public schools. The Representation Project charges schools and corporations between $49 and $1,500 to screen its documentaries, and the charity has reported earning $956,000 from film sales since Newsom took office.

And as far as “fishing expedition by OrangeManBad” goes, even MS NOW isn’t quite buying it.

At mark 2:00, Jennifer is asked about the current investigation having been initiated by the Biden White House. I counted six eyeblinks, then an eyeroll before Jennifer bumbles and mumbles and “well, I don’t know nothin’ but *they* have always targeted my husband.”

Wow, how fast does “partner” become “husband” when she wants to lean on him as the real target for her own avarice. Her “documentaries” are a pipeline of taxpayer and donor money into her pocket and they are the epitome of virtue signaling to the Queer Left that Frisco grooming is alive and well in Newsom’s control of school curriculum, no matter how much harm they do.

Controversy erupted not long after Newsom’s Department of Education gave its stamp of approval to the first partner’s documentaries in 2019 when a public junior high classroom of 11- and 12-year-olds in Patterson, Calif., screened The Mask You Live In, which presents traditional masculinity as harmful to young boys. One California father said his 12-year-old daughter was traumatized after seeing the film at school, which contained footage of young men searching for graphic and violent pornography. “Viewers also briefly see a clear picture of sexual bondage and acts of violence against nude or thinly dressed young women,” according to the Modesto Bee.

“It is the worst thing my daughter has been exposed to,” the father told the Bee. “When I send her to school, I don’t want her to see porn. That is what this is.”

Bay Area “values” do not translate into a national platform. Even as Hairgel has been wont to posture as a moderate from time to time, his unhinged rants and his exercise of raw — might we say Kingly? — power within California is not exactly winning friends among the fastly-declining rational liberals.

Californians working in the state’s education sector are warning against what they describe as an “undemocratic power play” by Gov. Gavin Newsom to strip authority from the state’s Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Assembly Bill 181, passed as a budget trailer bill for the 2026–27 fiscal year, shifts day-to-day managerial power from the state superintendent to a newly created position: the Education Commissioner. Unlike the independently elected superintendent, the new commissioner will be appointed by and report directly to the governor.

Gavin couldn’t chance Sonja Shaw, a conservative/pro-parental rights candidate, winning so he has gutted the office, leaving the elected Superintendent as little more than a ceremonial post.

This is what the Newsom partnership promises for the nation.

featured image original graphic by Darleen Click