Jill Stein’s Election Recount Efforts Stink Like Rotten Fish [VIDEOS]

Jill Stein’s Election Recount Efforts Stink Like Rotten Fish [VIDEOS]

Jill Stein’s Election Recount Efforts Stink Like Rotten Fish [VIDEOS]

Green Party candidate Jill Stein wants a recount of votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. She would have you believe that it’s just because she wants integrity in elections. According to a Green Party spokesman, “There’s no smoking gun here, but we’re saying the American public needs to have it investigated to make sure our votes count.”

iu-1
Credit: cbsnews.com

Stein has now hit her fundraising goals for recounts in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

Stein appeared on CNN Thanksgiving morning, with wide, oh-so-innocent eyes, telling the anchor that all she wants is to make sure that all votes were accurately counted. Because, you know, hacking. When the anchor pushed back and insisted there was no evidence of tampering, Stein told her that we shouldn’t “have to prove that there’s been fraud or tampering.”

Right. Sort of like our criminal justice system in which the accused is innocent until proven guilty. Stein would flip that on its head as regards voting.

So why is Jill Stein so concerned about vote tampering when there is no evidence that such a thing happened? Furthermore, even if — and that’s a big IF — there was fraud in those states, statistically it would not flip the election. Donald Trump would still be the victor in the Electoral College.

There may be two possibilities here, and they both stink.

  • Follow the Money. Stein originally had a fund-raising goal of $2.5 million to launch a recount. Suddenly it jumped to $7 million. Lawyers’s fees, she claims. Or is it shipping and handling? On her website she talks about “election integrity efforts.” Whatever that is. I think the promotion here is less integrity and more promoting Jill Stein and the Green Party. Or maybe the Clintons?? Hmm.

image-1

  • Follow the Clintons.  New York Magazine reported on Tuesday that a group of computer scientists and attorneys (always attorneys) informed the Clinton campaign that they found evidence that election results in the three named states “may have been manipulated or hacked.” One of those scientists, J. Alex Halderman, contended that the article “includes some incorrect numbers,” and that he did not claim definite suspicious vote counts existed. But could the Clintons have their squalid hands all over this recount ploy, using Jill Stein as a patsy, in order to disrupt the election outcome?

I wouldn’t be surprised. Not one bit.

We all remember the election of 2012, when many of us were gobsmacked by the re-election of Barack Obama over Mitt Romney. I recall seeing many articles being posted on social media coming from rather dodgy websites claiming voter fraud in Obama’s re-election. However, those notions died a swift death. No one in the Republican party insisted on recounts. The party moved on.

What is it about Democrats and losing elections they think are owed them? I was never a big Trump supporter, but as far as I’m concerned, January 20th can’t come soon enough.

Written by

Kim is a pint-sized patriot who packs some big contradictions. She is a Baby Boomer who never became a hippie, an active Republican who first registered as a Democrat (okay, it was to help a sorority sister's father in his run for sheriff), and a devout Lutheran who practices yoga. Growing up in small-town Indiana, now living in the Kansas City metro, Kim is a conservative Midwestern gal whose heart is also in the Seattle area, where her eldest daughter, son-in-law, and grandson live. Kim is a working speech pathologist who left school system employment behind to subcontract to an agency, and has never looked back. She describes her conservatism as falling in the mold of Russell Kirk's Ten Conservative Principles. Don't know what they are? Google them!

2 Comments
  • J Walter says:

    Everyone knows she is a clinton proxy. She is going to spend millions of dollars and she still won’t win.

    She is what is called a useful idiot. I wonder how much of this money is coming from average people (women) who think that this will stop non existing misogyny.

    I swear, liberals get dumber by the day.

  • GWB says:

    There’s plenty of vote fraud going on. It’s just that it hasn’t been focused enough in the right areas for it to affect a presidential election, yet. Vote fraud in Chicago just keeps a blue state blue. Vote fraud in Tennessee (or Virginia!) might make a difference – but it hasn’t, so far.
    And, of course, this recount effort is an attempt to enable vote fraud, not uncover it. The best way to discover a few million votes that were moldering in a car trunk somewhere is to do a recount.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead
Instagram
Instagram did not return a 200.