Behold! As some of us prepare to celebrate Christmas-a holiday that celebrates the birth of Jesus and therefore, the gift of LIFE, feminists continue to celebrate-you guessed it-death.

Of course, they don’t see it this way. Just days before a celebration of life, feminists like Jessica Valenti call ingenious ideas of makeshift abortion kits (you know, in case abortion should become illegal) “remarkable”. We kid you not:

This is a remarkable piece about medical students learning to perform abortions in case the procedure is made illegal https://t.co/FvNGWD0AXC

— Jessica Valenti (@JessicaValenti) December 22, 2017

The article Valenti references is one that describes a “discreet procedure’ a group performed on a papaya assimilating an abortion.

“…And it so happens that the papaya, with its little fruity neck and a central cavity full of seeds and pulp, is a serviceable approximation of a woman’s cervix and womb for the purposes of basic initiation for a medic in training.”

And the opposition hit hard:

Sooooooooo..just to be sure…you get the warm and snuggies over illegal abortions?

— Cathy A. Salazar (@LvlyWords) December 22, 2017

This is the saddest tweet I've ever read. The joy that you find in the brutal murder of our most vulnerable members of society is truly horrifying.

— Doc in Alaska (@cguild55) December 22, 2017

It gives you HOPE that so many medical students are planning on breaking the law and committing murder?
What a #Ghoul!

— The Department of No (@SantasTavern) December 22, 2017

Jessica’s response?

I've been writing about abortion long enough that I shouldn't be surprised, but it still never ceases to amaze how little anti-choicers actually understand about the procedure. Some of the responses to this thread are astoundingly stupid.

— Jessica Valenti (@JessicaValenti) December 22, 2017

Astoundingly stupid?! Nope. What is stupid? Performing an assimilated abortion on a fruit and likening it to a “serviceable approximation of a woman’s cervix and womb”. That’s just dumb. And “training” medical students to take a long instrument to a papaya for the purposes of “pretending” to perform an (illegal) abortion is sheer idiocy.

And Valenti’s response to parenting? (Why yes, she is a parent).

So, why did she choose to have a child? Was she giving in to the patriarchy by doing so? And what happens when he daughter is old enough to question what the procedure known as abortion entails? Will she explain the procedure in detail? Will she tell her daughter why others oppose this procedure? Will she talk about reports or organ harvesting? Will she tell her daughter that she cheered on her celebrity friend for bragging about her abortion? Will she tell her daughter that it is okay to do something or obtain something illegally because this is what she just called “remarkable”.

I remember having to explain the concept of abortion to my son last year. We were in the car and he asked if the baby’s heart is beating at the time of the procedure. I answered honestly. He paused. He looked out the window and then he said, “That’s a person. A person that could be the next president. A person that could cure cancer. A person that could do great things. What a waste.”

Out of the mouths of babes. But by all means, “educated” feminists. Continue to mock those who oppose your views as being inferior to the likes of your ilk. After all, a cervix and a womb are just like a papaya.