Roger Stone And The Biased Juror

Roger Stone And The Biased Juror

Roger Stone And The Biased Juror

It seems there was a juror on the Roger Stone trial who didn’t bother to hide her animosity towards President Trump. She outed herself yesterday in an article via CNN.

“A juror on the Roger Stone trial said she wants to “stand up” for the four prosecutors who withdrew from the case in response to their sentencing recommendation being changed by Department of Justice leadership.

Tomeka Hart said she had remained silent about the case for months out of concern for her safety and “politicizing the matter.””

She didn’t want politics involved in this mess? Let’s look at Tomeka Hart’s politics shall we? First of all, she is a Democrat. Yes, I know. SHOCKING. Secondly, at the time of the trial, she already had one failed campaign under her belt. In 2012 she lost the TN primary to incumbent Rep. Steve Cohen.

Keep in mind, I among others think Roger Stone is a jackass. However, the entire trial was a complete circus. Remember when CNN magically managed to be on scene when Stone’s house was raided and he was hauled out in handcuffs in the wee hours of the morning?

Remember when Stone made statements that Judge Amy Berman Jackson didn’t agree with? I do.

“Jackson has already tangled with Stone. Last February, a photo of the judge on Stone’s Instagram account seemed to violate a gag order she had imposed on him because of concerns about pretrial publicity. The image appeared to show a gun sight’s crosshairs next to a photo of Jackson’s face. Stone said he wasn’t sure who posted the image, but he said he viewed it as a Celtic cross. He apologized for it.”

What is the media doing right now? Making this all about Trump. Blaming Trump for lashing out at Judge Jackson.

Just wait, the cries of ‘he’s being MEAN to Tomeka Hart!’ start in 3, 2, 1… Oh wait. It’s already started. The New York Times doesn’t like Trump saying Hart was biased.

She was, and she is. Her statement to CNN and her FB post show that bias loud and clear. She references Beto supporter and fellow juror Seth Cousins ‘look at me!’ WaPo op-ed last November as part of her justification in calling out Trump and supporting the temper tantrum throwing prosecutors. 

“As Seth asserts, “We did not convict Stone based on his political beliefs or his expression of those beliefs. We did not convict him of being intemperate or acting boorishly. We convicted him of obstructing a congressional investigation, of lying in five specific ways during his sworn congressional testimony and of tampering with a witness in that investigation.”

The prosecutors who have now resigned did a masterful job of laying out every element of every charge, backed with ample evidence. As foreperson, I made sure we went through every element, of every charge, matching the evidence presented in the case that led us to return a conviction of guilty on all 7 counts.”

You can read her full post here.

Here’s my problem with this. When you are a juror on a major trial, or even a minor one, staying away from news and social media is an absolute MUST.

Tomeka Hart’s tweets, which have been found by numerous people, show a definitive bias against President Trump. This one is from months prior.

We are supposed to believe that she set aside any political considerations while serving as the fore person on the Roger Stone jury.

Here’s the deal, as I said above, as a juror, you shut down your social media presence entirely. You also keep away, as best you can, from the news media. It certainly looks like Ms. Hart did not do that.

What this does, in my opinion, is raise serious questions as to the impartiality of the jury as a whole. I sat as a juror on a high profile criminal trial for fifteen days. The judge was absolutely emphatic that all media and social media must be put on hold that entire time. He even checked that we were adhering to the rules.

Did Judge Jackson instruct the jury to do the same? She put a gag order on Roger Stone. Did she put a gag order on the jury?

Given that Tomeka Hart has now come out in support of the prosecutors, I’d say calling her impartiality into question during the trial is a reasonable next step for Roger Stone’s attorneys.

Welcome Instapundit Readers!

Feature Photo Credit: Roger Stone pre-trial hearing May 30, 2019 by Victoria Pickering via Flickr, cropped and modified

Written by

10 Comments
  • You don’t gag a juror after the trial, but you are 100% correct: No social media let along posting about the case and you have to disclose bias such as this. That is universal in most civil and all criminal cases.

    But given the blatant nature of this–is it a ‘get out of jail free’ card for Stone (without the President having to even give him a pardon)?

    • Curly Dave says:

      Is it a “get out of jail free” card? No, but it definitely is reasonable grounds for a new trial.

      And, it may well turn out that no prosecutor is willing to go to trial again. A lot of government malfeasance has come out in the recent past, and his attorneys may ask some very hard and pointed questions that the government does no really want to have to answer.

    • Nina Bookout says:

      Hi! Actually I was inquiring as to why the jury didn’t have a gag order DURING the trial! 😉

  • DaveM says:

    KlanPresident. Umm, Trump isn’t racist? Some of his supporters might be, but that is hardly the case for most of them. There is hardly a more offensive term you can call someone who is white and not racist. And I certainly don’t think she should serve on any jury even remotely connected to a Republican in politics or a person connected to Trump. And even if she deletes stuff from her social media at this late date, it isn’t as though it is really gone… And given that she apparently lied about various issues to get accepted to the jury, the whole trial should be done over. Or perhaps, not done over at all.

  • Orson says:

    How many Klansters were/are Democrats like Tomeka Hart? 99.99. How many Pubbies? 0.01
    Case visually closed.

  • Bop Crash says:

    Annnd she’s the one we know about.

  • grayswindir says:

    The questions asked the prospective jurors and her answers would certainly now be relevant. If her social media postings contradicted answers she gave to those questions, it would justify a retrial. As well as criminal charges against her. Ironically her own dishonesty may undermine, what in her view, was admirable effort by the prosecutors.

  • GWB says:

    We convicted him … The prosecutors who have now resigned did a masterful job of laying out every element of every charge, backed with ample evidence.
    Fine. But you’ve now corrupted that by showing that you were biased before the trial, and during it.

    Tomeka Hart’s tweets, which have been found by numerous people
    And which she began deleting. I hope someone got good screen captures.

    I’d say calling her impartiality into question during the trial is a reasonable next step for Roger Stone’s attorneys
    Yep.

  • Robert Shotzberger says:

    You mean the investigatiuon that turned out to be totally bogus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead
Instagram