Opinion: 3D printable guns aren’t the end of life as we know it.

Opinion: 3D printable guns aren’t the end of life as we know it.

Opinion: 3D printable guns aren’t the end of life as we know it.

Well, the Chicken Little Brigade of Gun Control is at it again. As usual, they aren’t letting facts get in the way of their narrative either. In case you haven’t heard, they are both in an uproar over the fact the U.S. government came to an agreement with Defense Distributed to allow them to post their plans for 3D printable guns to the internet while at the same time crowing over their “victory” in obtaining a temporary restraining order against him to prevent said publication. I tell you, it would be easy to get whiplash trying to keep up with their outrage and fist pumping.

We’ve heard from “experts” on guns like Alyssa Milano, who penned an op-ed piece about the dangers of this “downloadable death.” She begins her piece by going straight to the fear – nothing new for her and her ilk.

Imagine this: the convicted domestic abuser next door tries to buy a gun. He’s turned down because he fails his background check. When he gets home, he opens up his browser, and in half an hour he’s printing out his own undetectable, fully functional plastic gun, with no background check and no record of his purchase.

Except it isn’t quite that easy. Not that she bothers to tell us so. First, you need an expensive 3-D printer. Then you need the plans. Then you need the material to print the parts. Then you need the non-printable parts. Then you need to have the ability to put it all together. Hmm, doesn’t exactly sound like something you’re going to be able to do on the spur of the moment when you put it like that, does it? But poor little Alyssa, who never met a pro-Second Amendment argument she liked, can’t be bothered by such things as reality. It might interfere with the narrative.

“It is not hyperbole to say that this could mean the end of our ability to have meaningful gun violence prevention in America.”

Oh, woe is me. So, if we prevent the distribution of these prints, does she really think that means gun violence in our country will lessen? If she does, she’s even more of a clod when it comes to the reality of gun violence than I thought and that’s saying a lot.

Honestly, Dana Loesch has the best response to poor Alyssa and her compatriots.

But Alyssa’s not the only one. We have the Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healy calling out these “dangerous downloadable guns.” Now, I don’t know about you, but I suddenly have visions of Star Trek’s replicator where you told it what you wanted and poof! it came sliding out the slot before you, ready to eat or wear or whatever.

First, as the NRA points out, it’s been 30 years since the Feds passed legislation banning “untraceable firearms.”

By the way, that was done with input and agreement of the NRA – something we sure aren’t hearing about from the gun grabbers. Nor are they telling you this:

“Defense Distributed’s controversial files are designed to 3D-print receivers. What comes out of the 3D printer isn’t a working weapon, but something that still must be mated to bolts, barrels, trigger groups, stocks, and other necessary parts before it ever fires a bullet. Defense Distributed’s Liberator pistol design is perhaps the closest thing to a complete printable firearm, but the enthusiast must still source key parts such as a metal tube for a barrel and a nail for a firing pin.”

Hmmm, so it isn’t quite so “undetectable” as they claim, not if it has metal in it.

Again, reality doesn’t fit the narrative.

Other things we aren’t being told by the Chicken Little Brigade: you have to have a 3D printer big enough to print the parts. It is a time-consuming process that can take hours for a single part to print. It is expensive. For now, at least, these guns are also basically ineffective because they will fall apart after just a couple of shots. Oh, and they can’t hold as many rounds as regular guns.

Once more, we aren’t told this because it doesn’t fit with the fear tactics the other side tries to use.

Here’s reality: plans for guns printable on 3D printers are available from other sources than the one we’re hearing about right now. They’ve been available for years. The Fifth Circuit has said the manufacture and possession of a plastic pistol or plastic lower receiver (subject to the Undetectable Firearms Act) “is legal for United States citizens and will remain legal for United States citizens regardless of the outcome of this case.”

We’re hearing about all this now because of action taken under the Obama Administration. The government filed a lawsuit to prevent the online distribution – for free – of the printer plans for 3D guns on the basis “that the files would be available for international download and international use. It also argued that the files at issue were not “expressive speech.” The Fifth Circuit noted “printing a fully functional plastic lower receiver or Defense Distributed’s single-shot plastic pistol ‘is legal for United States citizens and will remain legal for United States citizens regardless of the outcome of this case.’ ”

The original case was a First Amendment case, one the government wasn’t going to win. That is why the Justice Department, under the Trump Administration, settled with Defense Distributed. But “oh, no, we can’t have that,” said the Chicken Little Brigade. So they started their rounds, once again calling for further limitations of our Second Amendment rights.

And, lest he be left out, little David Hogg had to have his say in the matter. (His comments begin around the 3:00 mark.)

As usual, Hogg speaks without knowledge. He doesn’t understand what the Obama era regulations were about, or what the original law suit was about. He apparently thinks 3D printed guns were illegal under Saint Obama and Demon Trump has a deal with the Devil NRA to put these horrible weapons out on the street. When will the media quit giving this child any credence? Never mind, I know that answer. They will do so only after he deviates from their own narrative.

So, what about the TRO they are all crowing about? Is it really a victory? Not really. For one, it is temporary. The hearing is set for August 10th. For another, even if the judge in Seattle confirms the order, it can still be appealed. Then there’s the little fact the plans had already been online and downloaded by a number of people before the TRO was issued. Any damage has already been done. And let’s not forget that these aren’t the only 3D printable gun plans out there.

This is, once again and unsurprisingly, a tempest in a teacup of liberal tears. One day, the Chicken Little Brigade will learn that crying “the sky is falling” over every little thing that offends them will backfire and bite them in the ass. For me, that day can’t come too soon.

Written by

22 Comments
  • SFC D says:

    It’s much easier to make a zip gun out of hardware store parts.

  • Nina says:

    One never knows what kind of edumacation we’ll receive whenever Davey opens his mouth and dumps opinions on the floor.

    Case in point. I had no idea that all the NRA supporters are libertarians. But Davey says we are, so it must be so.

    • Amanda Green says:

      I know, right? It’s like I didn’t know the NRA should support the ban on the 3D printable guns because they — the NRA — doesn’t make any money on them.

  • Nicki says:

    Or just buy one from the street or get one from a friend, which is where the vast majority of guns used in criminal activity come from in the first place. Milano is such a friggin’ moron!!!

    • Jodi Giddings says:

      Indeed she is. What’s worse: the lawmakers spewing this nonsense who know better (or should). They will literally say ANYTHING to regain power.

    • Amanda Green says:

      Or steal one. But that doesn’t fit the narrative because we know that only legally gotten guns are used in crimes. (rolls eyes)

  • John C. says:

    3D printers aren’t, and haven’t ever, really, been needed for making guns; there is an entire industry in the Philippines making firearms, from “cigarette gun” matchlocks and “slam-bang” shotguns to sophisticated full-auto guns, with workshops less well-equipped than many Americans have in their garages. Look up “Paltik guns.” And for the DIYers out there, you may find http://www.weaponeer.net/forum/uploads/Weaponeer/files/2007-10-17_131429_AR_15_Scratch_Built_Receiver.pdf and https://grabcad.com/library/ar-15-sheet-metal-and-tube-steel-upper-receiver-1 of interest, and no 3D printer is required. The bolt-together lower plans are 14 years old, and the media has STILL not caught up…

    • Amanda Green says:

      Dana Loesch’s tweet in response to Alyssa Milano said it all, imo. She reminded dear little Alyssa that there have been folks making their own weapons for, well, basically ever. You don’t need a 3D printer to do it.

    • GWB says:

      And, never forget that the M-1 (yes, that M-1) was designed and the prototype built in a prison machine shop. (Look up Carbine Williams – it’s a great movie with Jimmy Stewart, though a few liberties are taken to ‘enhance’ the story.)

      • Amanda Green says:

        I had forgotten that. Of course, I can just see how the gun grabbers would say that simply proves their point about who wants such guns. SMH

      • Scott says:

        Just for clarification GB, that’s the M-1 CARBINE, not the M-1 BATTLE RIFLE…Not that the distinction makes any difference at all in this context, just in the sake of acuracy

  • GWB says:

    He’s turned down because he fails his background check. When he gets home, he opens up his browser, and surfs to Defense Distributed, where he puts out $250 bucks (and $10 for the flash drive with the software) and waits a week for it to be delivered, meanwhile ordering a bunch of polymer reels from Amazon (another $50), which gets delivered in 2 days because he’s a Prime member, then he has to re-order polymer because when he finally gets the machine he screws up the first two tries (another $100) over the course of the first week, then he has to go buy ammo ($25), which he realizes he has to manually insert into this new toy one round at a time, so he’s gonna have to get *real* close, and in half an hour three weeks he’s printing out his own undetectable, fully functional plastic gun, with no background check and no record of his purchase (except for all the shit he had to buy)
    FIFY, numpty.

    Oh, and because of freedom, the lady who is the object of his obsession spends those three weeks buying a gun (because she passed the background check), buying plenty of ammo, and taking a class on concealed carry and some range time, with a total cost approximating the creepy dude (probably around $700 if she opted for an inexpensive compact 1911).
    And, since she learned to go about in Condition Yellow, and her neighbor raises her to Condition Red, she smoothly pulls out her shiny new pistol and shoots the m*****f***** twice in the chest when he tries to get close to her with his plastic “ghost” gun. Then, she calls 911 to report a shooting while keeping her weapon trained on him in case he twitches.
    At some point, because she’s a girl, she might even say, “Awww, isn’t that cute? Look at that little plastic gun!”

    • Amanda Green says:

      ROFLMAO. Yes!

      But you forgot one point. After she shoots him, he manages to lift his little plastic gun — and does it come in pink? — and fires. Imagine his surprise when it blows up in his face, adding insult to injury. VBEG

      • GWB says:

        Well, I was assuming she was more competent than that, and shot him again if he managed to raise the gun. 😉

      • SFC D says:

        And since he was turned down because of a failed background check, he’s already committed a felony by “printing” a gun. BTW, MRS D has a compact 1911. She’s also an RN and knows how to make you bleed.

  • GWB says:

    “It is not hyperbole to say that this could mean the end of our ability to have meaningful gun violence prevention in America.”
    Ummm, Alyssa, that’s pretty much the definition of “hyperbole”.

    does she really think that means gun violence in our country will lessen?
    Pfft, no! She just thinks it will be much easier to take away all the other guns if they don’t have to contend with these as well.

    People act like gunsmithing is a new thing.
    Ding!!!

    downloadable guns
    *FACEPALM* If I could download firearms, I’d have a whole bedroom full of them! I’d have more than I have books! But, sadly, no, you can only download the plans for them and have to spend a lot of time, money, and effort to actually turn them into GUNS.

    Oh, and they can’t hold as many rounds as regular guns.
    Actually, the Liberator can only hold… ONE. Though, honestly, that’s as many rounds as a lot of guns can hold. You know, like muskets?

    As usual, Hogg speaks without knowledge.
    Or critical thinking, or reason.

    Then there’s the little fact the plans had already been online
    Well, and the fact that, since the Trump administration decision, anyone could pull up their VPN, use let’s say a Russian IP address, and download them perfectly legally (since the ONLY way to enforce the TRO is to temporarily ban certain IP addresses). And ain’t *that* ironic!

    Chicken Little Brigade
    Honestly, Amanda, you should call them the Gun Control Brigade, of the Chicken Little Division. For us who lived with the Army for a time, it reads right that way. 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead
Instagram