Newsflash! Beto Steps on Own Crank

Newsflash! Beto Steps on Own Crank

Newsflash! Beto Steps on Own Crank

Beto O’Rourke is a kale chai-slurping, epicene soy boy. This is not a new observation to anyone who has watched him flail like one of those goofy, inflatable tube things at a car dealership in an effort to stand out in the vast field of douchery that’s sprouting Democrats who are trying to buy votes with other people’s money. Lately, however Beto O’Rourke has snatched the gun grabber baton from Eric Swalwell and is running with it…

…hopefully straight into a garbage dumpster, where he rightfully belongs.

You see, all the Democrats want to take things from you via government force: your earnings, your property, your ability to choose the education your children receive, and yes – your guns. Beto, however, loves force extra hard! So hard, in fact, that he proudly said so in an effort to pander to the gun-grabbing left during the last debate.

That’s right, boys and girls, he actually admitted it, while the hardcore progs in the audience cheered him on.

There’s only one problem: by admitting that the Democrats do, in fact, want to take your guns away, Beto stepped on his own crank and is taking the party down with him down a road they never intended to travel. Gun control was never a winning issue for the left, and even CNN’s Chris Cillizza admits that the Trump campaign will use Beto’s threat like a happy sock and then flog the Democrat nominee with it.

While a mandatory buyback campaign of weapons like the AR-15 and AK-47 doesn’t amount to a wholesale gun confiscation, it walks much closer to that doomsday scenario the NRA has spent years painting as just over the horizon if Democrats get into power.

Even if O’Rourke never even sniffs the Democratic presidential nomination, the eventual nominee will have to answer for his support of a mandatory buyback program.

The Democrats have been very cautious about trying to convince Americans that no one is out to take our guns and claiming they respect the Second Amendment. No one believed that lip service, but they at least made a nominal effort to hide it.

Beto just blew that out of the water with his “WE GONNA TAKE YOU GUNZ AWAY!” honesty that’s so uncharacteristic coming from a leftist dick weasel.

And if you think, the Trump campaign won’t take advantage of this blunder and point to Beto’s comments to confirm what we all already knew: that the Democrats have every intention of taking our guns away, I’ve got this bridge…

Gun control is a losing issue for the Democrats. Hell, even Bill Clinton Bill acknowledged the part played by pro-gun voters in the 1994 mid-term election losses for the Democrats after the so-called “assault weapons” ban passed with supposedly 77 percent support among Americans. Beto just handed the GOP a cudgel with which to bludgeon the Democratic nominee, and since it won’t be him, he apparently doesn’t give a damn. He just wants to show how bold and unique he is, except that he’s not.

Beto is an unoriginal, boring dolt who glommed onto Swalwell’s “give up your guns, or the government will nuke you” platform and ran with it like a demented, flailing wildebeest. He thinks that having government force behind him will prompt Americans to just hand over their property, and when challenged on that assumption, he runs crying to mommy (Twitter) and daddy (FBI).

Screen capture: O’Rourke Twitter feed

After Beto’s proclamation, a Texas GOP state legislator responded with a challenge that basically amounted to “Come and get it, bitch.”

Beto’s response was typical of every whimpering, pusillanimous fuckpouch  who realizes that he’s a pathetic nothing without jackboots and leftist Big Tech standing behind him.

“That’s a death threat!” Beto whined and immediately lodged a complaint with Twitter, getting Briscoe Cain’s reply removed from the platform. And then, to prove just what a brave soy latte-sipping furry he is, he complained to the FBI (who probably laughed at the pathetic, squealing, bucktoothed snowflake). First, he threatens violence against millions of innocent, law-abiding Americans who own the most popular rifle on the market today (and if you don’t think that isn’t a threat, ask Robert Francis what happens when Americans refuse to give up their property to the government), then when said defiant, freedom-loving citizens respond accordingly, he howls that they’re threatening him and runs to his enforcers for support.

If Beto had any balls at all, he would not flinch at a sarcastic response to his pathetic little diktat. But since he is a pants-shitting, force-worshiping, sniveling, petty shitgibbon, he does what any other pathetic bully does when challenged – runs back to mommy and daddy and hides behind their backs while sticking his tongue out at his would-be victim.

Any politician who advocates forcible appropriation of the private property of law-abiding citizens is advocating violence. Beto is either too stupid to understand this, or he thinks Americans are. Judging by the idiotic audience response to his false bravado on stage during the debate, he may not be wrong about his supporters.

The rest of the country will raise its middle fingers in salute.


Featured image: Brand X Studio, used with permission.

Written by

Marta Hernandez is an immigrant, writer, editor, science fiction fan (especially military sci-fi), and a lover of freedom, her children, her husband and her pets. She loves to shoot, and range time is sacred, as is her hiking obsession, especially if we’re talking the European Alps. She is an avid caffeine and TWD addict, and wants to own otters, sloths, wallabies, koalas, and wombats when she grows up.

  • Scott says:

    Good post Marta, now I just hope that the President stops running his mouth about supporting gun registration (which is what the dims are calling “expanded background checks”.) Beto and company have handed him a club, but if she supports / signs anti-gun legislation (beyond the ill advised ban on bump stocks), he will hand it right back to them.

  • GWB says:

    You made me have to look up a word. Good job! 🙂

    will use Beto’s threat like a happy sock and then flog the Democrat nominee with it

    Any politician who advocates forcible appropriation of the private property of law-abiding citizens is advocating violence.
    Don’t forget the advocacy for removing a constitutional right from law-abiding citizens is tyranny. Which is also violence.

    Oh, and if Beta is reading this, “Hey, COME AND GET IT! I will be ready to do to you what the men of Lexington and Concord did to those trying to take their weapons!”

  • Joe Stewart says:

    Did the FBI arrest the Texan? The FBI is corrupt to the core. They need to all be fired and replaced with new people.

  • Nicebead says:

    Never commented here before, but I think you have outdone yourself with this one. I love it. Keep up the good fight. All these commies can go to hell!

  • Cameron says:

    I had a thought about all of this and posted it elsewhere. I may be wrong but hear me out:

    What if O’Rourke knew he was tanking? As in, someone from the DNC had a sit down with him and told him that his best option was to resign gracefully and maybe get a cushy Cabinet position.

    His ego would be stung pretty badly so in retaliation he makes that announcement knowing full well it made the Democrats’ chances of winning the Presidency a long shot.

    • Scott says:


      Seeing as most dims have their priorities in the following order:
      1. Self enrichment / power
      2. Party
      3. Special interest groups (as long as they advance the two items above
      4. (Optional) Good of the Country / her Citizens

      I’d say that your theory has at least a reasonable chance of being true.

    • James says:

      While this is possible, my take on it is, it’s more likely knowing his future fame and fortune resides in riding his political horse he and the DNC have agreed to a strategy where he stakes the most extreme position possible to make lesser advances seem reasonable. It’s advantageous for him because he stays in the fold, may gain a prestigious position in any Demo presidency, and being fairly young he looks like a prophet when they do confiscate guns giving him a badge of courage to wear in his next run for president 2028. In 2028 no matter what the facts are the media and Dems will be touting gun confiscation as a huge success, saving America, and here’s the guy who had the courage to speak out even though it cost him the election.

    • John Q Galt says:

      I wondered if O’Rourke is realizing he won’t get nominated and is making a play for a CNN gig.

  • Inge says:

    “But since he is a pants-shitting, force-worshiping, sniveling, petty shitgibbon,…”

    Come on Marta, don’t hold back, let us know what you *really* think :-p

  • Jonathan Limebrook says:

    Wow, tell us how you really feel!

    Actually, never mind. I feel the same way.

  • zenman says:

    I think Beto’s done a great service to the gun cause. Made things bright, clear, and revealed their hypocrisy.

    Beto: we must buy back these weapons of war.

    response: so won’t you have to send police to confiscate them from people who refuse to turn them in?

    Beto: no, no, no, law abiding citizens will just turn them in, no need for all that.

    The unasked question on everyone’s minds, if they’re law abiding citizens then why do you need to confiscate any weapons from them ???

  • TOM KOLSTAD says:

    Democrats: “We’ll pay for the bullet!”

  • Craig B. says:

    Big-Media openly and shamelessly promoted Beto in his Texas Senate race against Ted Cruz, gifting him millions in what amounted to free ads.
    And he still lost.
    Now they’re lukewarm on him, at best.
    So what happened?
    Either the Big-Media praise was merited or not.
    And if not, will someone, someday hold Big-Media accountable?

  • Joe says:

    Um…. now can you tell us how you really feel? 8^)

  • Bob McFee says:

    Profanity does not strengthen your argument. On the other hand, if your intent is to drive away otherwise polite people, go for it.

  • Jerry Machusak says:

    This is the best piece I’ve read all year! We all recognize the truth of what you’re saying, but the way you say it so delightfully visceral. Please keep up the good work.

  • Mike Mahoney says:

    Beto’s complaints to Twitter and the FBI are indicative of someone who would use every tool at his disposal to get what he wants, no matter the appropriateness or legality of doing so.

  • Hugh says:

    I greatly enjoyed this.

  • OTOH/IMHO says:

    My T-shirt reads “I ain’t no Beto-phile!”

  • buddhaha says:

    Note how Cillizza’s coverage follows the playbook -“doesn’t amount to a wholesale gun confiscation”. It puts the notion of “no gun confiscation” in the heads of their target audience, the LIVs, while weasel-wording it with “wholesale” so he can’t be called out for lying. (If they leave you in possession of a single shot .22, it wouldnt be “wholesale”.) Tap dance, tap dance, tap dance…

    The buck-toothed twit has been getting away with all sorts of crap (Dui, anyone?) his entire life due to family money and connections, so getting called out by Cain to meet in the alley after school produces the same reflex – have someone else fight his battles for him.

    You’ve hit on something other commenters have missed, and what really puts the lie to “no gun-grab” bs the Democrat party is trying to peddle, and that is the full-throated cheer from the audience in response. That should be included in any Republican attack ad to forestall the, “Well, he’s an outlier,” excuse from the Dems. That was the party apparatchiks roaring their approval.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner