Court Rules Masterpiece Must Bake The Cake

Court Rules Masterpiece Must Bake The Cake

Court Rules Masterpiece Must Bake The Cake

Bake the cake! That’s the ruling from a Denver judge yesterday regarding Masterpiece Cakeshop and owner Jack Phillips.

According to Denver District Court Judge A. Bruce Jones, Jack Phillips can be compelled by law to go against his conscience and beliefs to bake the cake the customer demands. 

In Tuesday’s ruling, Denver District Judge A. Bruce Jones said Autumn Scardina was denied a cake that was blue on the outside and pink on the inside to celebrate her gender transition on her birthday because of her transgender status in violation of the law. While Jack Phillips said he could not make the cake because of its message, Jones said the case was about a refusal to sell a product, not compelled speech.

He pointed out that Phillips testified during a trial in March that he did not think someone could change their gender and he would not celebrate “somebody who thinks that they can.”

“The anti-discrimination laws are intended to ensure that members of our society who have historically been treated unfairly, who have been deprived of even the every-day right to access businesses to buy products, are no longer treated as ‘others,‘” Jones wrote.

There is OH SO MUCH WRONG with this judge’s ruling!

First of all, Autumn Scardina deliberately sought Jack Phillips out. It is no coincidence that Scardina went to Jack Phillips business the very afternoon after the United States Supreme Court announced it would hear Phillips’ appeal.

Scardina wanted, no demanded, that Jack Phillips make a specific gender transition cake. He refused to do so and, as he’s done before, offered an alternative. Scardina refused. But THEN called back and demanded he bake the cake that shows Satan smoking a joint. Phillips again refused to do so. Scardina complained to the state civil rights commission.

Here’s what Judge Jones refused to consider, IMO, regarding this case. Scardina’s deliberate targeting of Jack Phillips.

It’s not clear exactly why Ms. Scardina wanted a cake featuring Satan, apart from provoking him. When asked why she ordered the Satan cake, she said she wanted to believe Mr. Phillips was a “good person” and hoped to persuade him to see the “errors of his thinking.” That’s some deal for someone you say is a “good person”: Change your thinking or I will try to ruin you.

But according to Jones, Scardina’s request/demand of Jack Phillips was not a set up.

And that, my friends, is a boatload of horseshit.

First of all, Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission got smacked down hard by SCOTUS on the case. Secondly, even though Jack Phillips was handed a victory, the lawsuit by Scardina was allowed to proceed. Which, as is publicly known, Scardina did deliberately target Jack Phillips, and an activist judge bought into it.

According to those who want Jack Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop permanently shut down, it’s perfectly alright to demand that a business cave to THEIR beliefs, yet said business must not ever be allowed to have a differing opinion.

If Jack Phillips had truly found anyone within the LGBTQ community objectionable, he would’ve refused to serve them…period. Instead when provided with their request demand, he provided alternatives. He didn’t walk them out the door and refuse to give them anything. Nope, he just refused to abandon his beliefs and his conscience.

Yet what Scardina wants, and Judge Jones is now attempting to mandate, is that Jack Phillips to speak against his beliefs or, if he refuses, have his business permanently shut down.

“But asking me to draw on my creativity to communicate a message I believe is wrong? That’s asking me to stop being me. To change my own relationship with the Lord. To deny the deepest convictions of my heart, and pretend I haven’t learned the most difficult lessons of my life, or that they don’t matter. That’s not something any person has the right to ask of another. Or a command any government has the right to force one of its citizens to obey.”

That’s the key. Scardina is demanding that Jack Phillips give up his OWN right to freedom of speech, while expecting that she and her partner get to have free rein to target businesses without consequences.

Scardina doesn’t like Jack Phillips. Therefore, his freedom of speech and his conscience must be shut down. An activist judge bought into their schtick and ignored the Constitution.

Let us hope that the United States Supreme Court (and yes, this case is once again headed that way), will err on the side of Jack Phillips’ freedom of speech.

Feature Photo Credit: wedding cake with bride and groom by Hans via Pixabay, cropped and modified

Written by

  • ontoiran says:

    nah. if facebook and twitter can censor whoever they want “because they’re private companies and if you don’t like it you can go and start your own twitter (teeheechucklesnort)” then jack doesn’t have to bake the cake. the freak can go and bake it’s own gender reveal cake.

  • GWB says:

    The harassment of people like Jack and Barronelle
    That’s precisely what this is and has always been. It’s about breaking the will of people who don’t endorse your pathology. Period.

    The anti-discrimination laws are intended…
    To ensure that private citizens can not use their time, talents, and treasure as they see fit, but must conform to the reigning religious sect and may NOT have freedom of assembly or speech if it goes against those doctrines.
    While fixing the discrimination wrongly perpetrated by the governments in some states and locales they broke our actual civil rights and freedoms.

    It’s not clear exactly why Ms. Scardina wanted a cake featuring Satan, apart from provoking him.
    It’s VERY clear there was no other reason.
    And, btw, harassing lawsuits are supposed to be thrown out by the judiciary under its ethics guidelines. And many states allow recovery from the harasser.

    And that, my friends, is a boatload of horseshit.

    it’s perfectly alright to demand that a business cave to THEIR beliefs
    I wonder if this … person has their own job or business? Can they be harassed in return? “I want you to write a hundred times, ‘Jesus doesn’t want me to be an a**hole.'”

    Jack Phillips to speak against his beliefs
    This is the goal, people! To demand you renounce your beliefs and endorse the religious creed of the Progressive! That creed is not a wholesome one. And forcing anyone to endorse it is against the very founding of this nation. (Why do you think they work so hard to destroy that founding and the image of it?)
    These people should be treated the same as any religious zealot demanding you convert or become a second-class citizen. The problem is these folks have convinced themselves (and duped most Americans into believing) that Progressivism is not a religion.

    What is the obsession with forcing this one business into doing something he doesn’t want to do?
    It’s about power to assuage a lack of self-esteem. And that’s a HUGE part of spreading the Progressive religion: victimology.

    An activist judge bought into their schtick and ignored the Constitution.
    And should – ideally – face immediate, severe, personal, physical consequences for it.

  • Dana says:

    Your article referenced here, along with the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision which stated that the city of Philadelphia could not ban Catholic Social Services from contracting for foster care and adoption services simply because they decline to certify homosexual, ‘transgendered,’ or unmarried persons as acceptable adoptive or foster parents.

    I noticed that you referred to Mr Scardina as “she” at one point; you should not go along with the language of the left. I offer you my Stylebook as a good reference guide for conservatives to use.

  • […] second point is significant, especially considering the lawfare harassment of Masterpiece Cakeshop. Jack Phillips never sought to impose his beliefs on anyone of his customers, he just wants to […]

  • Mad Celt says:

    Spike it with baby laxative.

  • Mary says:

    So, in all good conscience is now bad, and the devilish is good. Go figure. Obvious, the latter has friends on the same wave length.

  • […] Underway? Transterrestrial Musings: The Killing of Kern County, also, Easy To Vote Victory Girls: Colorado Rules Masterpiece Bakery Has To Bake The Cake, but SCOTUS Rules 9-0 That Philly’s Catholic Social Services Doesn’t Have To Volokh […]

  • […] of going for a more full-throated defense of the First Amendment. Well, that led to Phillips being sued AGAIN, this time for not making a gender transition cake. Is he the only baker in Colorado, or the only […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner