Previous post
September 26, 2020
On September 23, I wrote a post about anti-Catholic bigotry in the Senate. One of the Senators mentioned in the article was Dianne Feinstein and her attack on Judge Amy Coney Barrett. Since it is widely rumored that President Donald Trump will nominate Coney Barrett for elevation to the Supreme Court of the United States, a human slug by the name of Dana Houle has Twitter insinuated that her adoption of two Haitian children may not be exactly “According to Hoyle”.
Trump is set to announce his pick at 5:00 p.m. E.D.T., and while Amy Coney Barrett is expected to be his pick, even the New York Times has admitted that the President is known for sending out disinformation to mess with his enemies’ heads. That last bit is my wording.
Mrs. Coney Barrett is the mother of seven children. Two of her children are adopted from Haiti. Enter Dana Houle, the human slug. Here is a portion of his bio from his website:
I graduated high school, traveled overseas without a rifle in my hand and work in politics. In the working class neighborhoods around Detroit where I grew up there are plenty of people who haven’t done any of those things, and I try to keep in mind the perspectives of them and others who aren’t like the typical denizens of Blogostan as I try to understand & explain politics happening within the US and beyond our borders. In Michigan I worked in organized labor, as a policy analyst in the legislature, and managed campaigns from state representative up to statewide office…
Even if Mr. Houle hadn’t made insinuations about the Judge’s adoption, I would be disposed to dislike him for the bratty, condescending comment about “traveled overseas without a rifle in my hand”. The military wouldn’t want you, you P.O.S.. I feel better, for the moment.
So, here are a few of the Tweets that Dana Houle sent out:
I would love to know which adoption agency Amy Coney Barrett & her husband used to adopt the two children they brought here from Haiti.
— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) September 25, 2020
And:
There were so many horrible adoptions by families like hers that the only reason to not question the legitimacy of the adoption is the effect it would have on her kids. But that’s a pretty huge reason. Probably enough to not do it
— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) September 25, 2020
Listen up, you mucous secreting, gastropod mollusk, you think that Amy Coney Barrett hasn’t had every inch of her life gone through? You think that the FBI hasn’t crawled through her intestines searching for anything that could derail her nomination? Could you bare that kind of scrutiny. I doubt I could. This ain’t her first rodeo. She is cool under pressure as we saw when Feinstein proclaimed that the “dogma lives loudly” within her. Looks like Dana Houle couldn’t take the backlash. He has locked down his Twitter account. He is a cowardly slug.
Interestingly, last week when Amy Coney Barrett was being discussed, I told my high school friend Marty that the Left would say that the white woman stole two black children. I was being sarcastic, but I was not wrong, as our slug Dana proved.
The Judge talked about her adoption in the clip from YouTube:
When the Judge and her husband went through with the second Haitian adoption, she was pregnant with her fifth child, a boy with Down Syndrome. She does not do it alone. From The Daily Wire:
In a 2019 discussion before the Notre Dame Club of Washington, D.C., Barrett said she and Jesse decided to adopt from Haiti because it was an impoverished country and because it was close enough to be able to visit as the kids became older. She and her husband debated over the years whether one should stay home with the children — she described plenty of “soul-searching and anxiety about balancing kids and work — but Jesse’s aunt has helped watch the kids for years, and Jesse took on more home duties after she became a judge. “What greater thing can you do than raise children?” she said. “That’s where you have your greatest impact on the world.[”]
Amen. It’s also beautiful that Coney Barrett and her husband adopted from Haiti because the kids would be able to visit. She is not trying to rob the children of their culture and heritage.
Dear Victory Girls readers, when you think about the coming days, remember what they did to Justice Kavanaugh. Think about the high-tech lynching of Justice Clarence Thomas. Recall what they did to Governor Sarah Palin and her Down Syndrome son, Trig.
When it comes to lying and smearing good people, there is no depth which The Left will not plumb to accomplish their evil. And, it is evil. Be ready.
Featured Image: Amy Coney Barret/Wikimedia Commons/cropped/Public Domain
“If you Rethuglicans are so pro-life why don’t you adopt black babies?”
*Amy adopts two black children.”
“NOT LIKE THAT!”
She should tell them that her children were adopted through the Clinton Foundation, because we can never have enough Lefty exploding heads.
And it would guarantee the adoption doesn’t get investigated, too.
Best remark I have heard so far:
“Hmmmm……two black kids. That’s twice as many blacks than ever clerked for RBG.”
Was not the revered JFK both a Democrat and a Catholic? Indeed I think he was the first Catholic to become President. So what’s changed for the Democrats? Do they deny the right of individuals in government or high public office to choose their faith – or no faith? Perhaps they’re scared of people having established principles in which they believe and by which they live their lives who are not ‘captured’ by fashionable woke theories?
Well, like Pelosi and others, Kennedy damn sure didn’t follow church teaching in much of anything, so he was the dems kind of catholic…
[…] know in their bones that it’s Ol’ Blue-Eyed Beezerbub up to his/her old tricks again, just a-colonizin’ and enslavin’ as is his eternal wont. The well-worn Catholic canard, out of favor since JFK, is even being dusted off and polished for […]
He is a cowardly slug.
I think we knew that before he locked down his Twit.
remember what they did to…
You forgot Bork.
I will say that I do have misgivings about adopting from foreign countries. It primarily centers around the idea of being a savior for the child(ren). That attitude does exist, and is usually a result of some measure of cultural bigotry (often on the left, btw). And expressing those misgivings shouldn’t get me raked over the coals by Barrett supporters. Expressing those misgivings about Barrett should get me at least a solid “Prove it!” from them. And if I did that, I would. Unlike the folks on the left.
Though, there is at least one person trying to investigate the adoption agency or the orphanage in Haiti. (They deleted their tweet.)
This is going to get grotesque. And not a single damned “journalist” will say anything about “How dare you make a woman cry!” or some such, as they did with Sotamayor and Kagan.
Tip Us!
Become a Victory Girl!
Follow Us On Twitter!
Recent Comments
VG Vids!
Rovin’ Redhead
10 Comments