My husband and I went to see Black Panther tonight, and I’m thrilled to report that it was a joy. It’s not just because I love Marvel movies, and not because I’m somehow “supposed to” like it, according to the social justice zealots, to whom black identity politics and social justice messaging were the point of this movie, insteadof good storytelling and quality acting. I loved it, because Black Panther was fun, well acted, and well written without being preachy and annoying.
Yes, nearly all the actors in the movie were black. I’ve seen a lot of derp on the part of the right, believe it or not, bitching about the mostly black cast. Come on, people! It wasn’t because of some social justice message the movie was trying to advance. The move is about an AFRICAN NATION, so it would stand to reason that the actors would be… well… black.
Was there some leftist messaging? Sure. But it wasn’t obnoxious and in your face. It was a subtle nod to doing the right thing, lending a hand to help others, and prospering together – by choice, not by force – which, by the way, is not the purview of the left.
The nation of Wakanda – prosperous, free, beautiful, advanced, and isolated – traditionally has kept itself secret. It kept itself out of world affairs. It had no interest in sticking its nose in others’ problems and other nations’ wars. It is a closed off world. Its citizens are happy, and they don’t want any part of the outside world, including refugees, who traitorous W’Kabi says bring their own problems – problems Wakanda doesn’t need.
The fact that an obvious alt-right character utters those words and then joins the bad guy who wants to use Wakanda’s advanced technology and weapons to take over the world ought to tell you where the filmmakers stand on the issue of immigration and refugees. But hey, it’s Hollywood, and I would have been surprised if there wasn’t at least some subtle leftist fapping in the film.
But at the same time, the movie rejects the “poor us, we’re victimized by the colonizers and white oppressors” ideology, even gently ridicules it by using the word “colonizers” when referring to the western world. It refuses to allow Wakanda’s advanced technology to take revenge on evil whitey and impose its vengeful rule for all those black folks suffering worldwide, and it refuses to lay blame anyone. And ultimately, the bad guy, who takes over the kingdom by force, and whose racist ideology is to use Wakanda’s technological and economic power to lift black people worldwide to rule others, is defeated.
It also rejects neoconservative INVADE ALL THE PLACES ideology. Wakanda doesn’t wage war on other nations merely because it can. Wakanda doesn’t impose its values on others merely because it has the technology and power to do so. It’s not greedy or selfish. It merely wants to exist in peace and be left alone, unless it is attacked by outsiders.
The mid-credits scene does come down on the side of globalism and rejects the idea of isolationism somewhat. Again, it’s Hollywood, and I would have been shocked not to have seen any leftist political messaging in the movie at all, but the movie treads cautiously around the issues of immigration, isolationism, and border security, choosing to focus on extending a helping hand to those in need, as all decent people should, rather than on specific policies that are much more complex and nuanced than whether or not to allow refugees to enter our borders.
Wakanda will no longer watch from the shadows. We cannot. We must not. We will work to be an example of how we as brothers and sisters on this earth should treat each other. Now more than ever the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.
Black Panther emphasizes national identity, culture, religion, freedom, and patriotism, not race. Wakanda’s leaders and citizens love their country and will sacrifice everything to defend the nation they built. Personal interests come behind service to the nation, especially for the elite Dora Milaje military regiment, tasked with the country’s defense. The Wakandans don’t hold any hatred for the “colonizers.” They are happy with what they have, they love and uphold their traditions, and they are decent people, who respect one another and help those who need it, as they did with a wounded Agent Ross. And ultimately, the would-be tyrant Erik Killmonger, whose schtick is all about race and his poor, oppressed African brothers, who are obviously much less important to him than his own power and rage, dies in the end.
The Wakandans know and respect the fact that they’re black, but they don’t wield their race as a weapon or an excuse for failure. They simply accomplish more and better, without rancor or arrogance. T’Challa ultimately makes the decision to no longer keep Wakanda a secret, not because of any kind of racial guilt, but because he feels a measure responsibility that a child – a member of his own family – was left all alone because of that secret. He feels responsible for that child, who ultimately grew up to be a vengeful killer. It is that personal responsibility that ultimately leads him to the decision to expose Wakanda, so that no other child gets left behind.
Those who are intent on seeing social justice messages will point to Wakanda’s unparalleled success and claim it’s because the country was never colonized. Others will point to the same success and get offended because the filmmakers intended to insult white people somehow by blaming them for the poverty and oppression of black people everywhere.
All I saw was a great cast (props to Letitia Wright as Shuri – T’Challa’s little sister and a luminous, adorable blend of, Q from the James Bond movies, Arrow’s Felicity Smoak, and Hugh Laurie’s Dr. House), a fun, action-filled movie, and two hours of pure enjoyment.
YMMV.
A friend wrote this review. He is a black man.
So the all the usual was there, 120lb black women kicking the ass of 200lb+ specifically white men (because black henchmen don’t exist, apparently), black people being just oh so superior to the evil neanderthal “colonists”, so much more wise, understanding, etc. Ok, fine, let’s just say for a second this is plausible. It is a fantasy land after all.
But there were several HUGE things that just straight up ruined the movie. I’ll list them in order of importance (as I remember them).
1. First thing- the obvious politicization of the whole movie. Now, of course, what did I expect- especially in this day and age. However I was surprised that the whole movie was just RIFE with it.
The main example I want to draw from is the main bad guy (who is technically T’challas older cousin, I believe, therefore having a right to the throne of Wakanda). Now, he has the stance that “black people have been oppressed for long enough, with the advanced tech we have here at Wakanda, we will liberate ALL BLACK PEOPLE from dee evil white man!”
Not only is the typical trope of blaming anyone with a light skin tone for the actions of those committed HUNDREDS of years ago, the main bad guy claims to be a history buff, however yet again, somehow skips the fuck over the fact that without Africans catching, enslaving, and selling OTHER Africans (which they still do to this day, fuck 300 years ago), the slave trade wouldn’t have been nearly as successful as it was, hell it might have fallen flat on it’s face.
Now later in the movie, he reasons to T’challa (the main hero) that since all people came from Africa, all people are his to rule.
If that is the case, that blows a huge hole in the main bad guys motivation. If that is true, then that means everybody is an “african”. There is no US vs THEM anymore. So why then are you mad at one particular skin colored “african” for the actions of “africans” that happened 300 years ago. Why are you dividing your own people this way then?
A smaller subpoint is that unless he knows the exact spot where the first man was created, he needs to shut the hell up, because what if somebody else is the president, ruler, king, whatever, of that spot? Then that means that THEY are the true kings of mankind, by his own logic.
2. Usually the bad guy and good guy in a movie are polar opposites, however, Tchalla isn’t. He also has the stance that the white man is the scum of the earth, however, he is the more “compassionate and wise” character- “We need to be betah den dee white man, we cannot act dee same as they”, yet again skipping over the fact that in reality, black people are the cause of 95% of their own problems. The only difference between him and the bad guy is that while the bad guy wants to initiate a proverbial “eye for an eye”, he just wants to live in peace, and move forward helping his fellow man. Some people would say that IS the opposite of the bad guys stance, but they make very sure to show you that Tchalla believes the white man is the main trouble, but they give him a moral high ground, since he is the “better man”, he “forgives” them and moves on.
So basically, they set it up so that it seems like the bad guy wants to “right a wrong” (I.E. he has been wronged in the first place, and therefore he is rightly justified in wanting justice), but Tchalla just wants to “forgive and forget” (meaning, yes, we have been wronged, but we need to be the better men, showing them compassion that they do not deserve).
So there really is no difference in between them, only utter and blatant leftist virtue signaling.
A smaller odd thing I noticed is that outside of the main bad guy, there isn’t any interaction with corrupt or evil black guys, or any of them, really- and even the main bad guy is presented like he has a point, whereas the white characters have the whole spectrum.
3. And the last point, which has been seen many times before, it’s the extreme focus on not only killing white men, but making sure to do it in the most painful way possible, I.E. attacking the genitals. Multiple times in the movie, the strong black woman kills the evil white man by shoving a spearhead (their main weapon) right into their balls. Nope, not surprising, because hitting men in the balls is a common source of comedic and/or symbolic actions coming out of hollywood, it’s just that in the rare event you do see a man kill a woman in a movie, never would it be by shoving a sword up her cunt. The thought wouldn’t even be ALLOWED.
Now I could go on and on and on (like the fact that there is no way a guy who has hundreds of confirmed kills and has been part of the highest special ops teams would think that just throwing Tchalla off a waterfall would for sure kill him without a doubt), but I don’t have the willpower for that.
Overall, a very mediocre movie, and factoring everything I just said, the movie is actually just a very racist piece of shit, with lazy, pandering story-writing
1 Comment