Biden Summarily Cleared Of Sexual Assault By NYT

Biden Summarily Cleared Of Sexual Assault By NYT

Biden Summarily Cleared Of Sexual Assault By NYT

The New York Times made themselves judge, prosecutor, defense counsel, and jury, and has now cleared Joe Biden of all sexual assault allegations against him. How very convenient!!!

After all, the Times couldn’t possibly have an ulterior motive in attempting to disprove any allegations against Biden. *cough*

If you haven’t been following the story – and there has been a mainstream media blackout on it, so little wonder – a former Senate staffer, Tara Reade, accused Joe Biden of sexually assaulting her in 1993. Now, given the media’s absolute dogged chasing of any accusation against a prominent, powerful man in the #MeToo era – say, a Supreme Court nominee – you would think that an accusation against the de facto Democrat nominee for president would trigger at least some modicum of interest.

Nope. When the story broke in The Hill, only more “right-leaning” outlets were willing to examine Reade’s story and discuss it. The Biden campaign was able to dodge the story because no major media outlet that they talked to would even dare mention it. That supposed champion of the “Believe All Women” movement, Alyssa Milano, suddenly had a new appreciation for “due process” when it was HER candidate under scrutiny (and she got righteously dragged for her hypocrisy). Biden campaign manager Symone D. Sanders “spotaneously” cleaned up her Twitter timeline of any Brett Kavanaugh commentary. The lack of discussion by the media, who would have been ALL OVER THIS if the accused was on the other side of the aisle, did not go unnoticed by The Hill.

Well, the New York Times decided to have a looky-loo at Tara Reade and her story. And while they admit that there is more support for her story than there was for, oh, say, Christine Blasey Ford’s story, they just can’t admit that there’s any “there” there.


Ergo, Biden is in the clear of any and all charges against him, because the venerable NYT couldn’t find anything! Case closed! Except that they first acknowledged that Biden has made women “uncomfortable” (and that they’ve spoken up about it). But don’t worry, they edited that part out of the story and deleted their first tweet about it!


Too bad the internet is forever, and people keep the receipts, huh?

But you know who the NYT is really concerned about?


Tara Reade has now filed a police report with the Washington Metropolitan Police Department regarding her alleged assault by Joe Biden (which is more than any accuser did against Brett Kavanaugh). That alone should garner some attention from the press, who you would think would now be mildly curious enough to ask Biden some questions. But this NYT “story” is designed to give Biden, his campaign, and the press all the cover it needs. If any reporter dares ask Biden about Reade’s complaint, how much do you want to bet he says, “Well, the New York Times covered it and said they couldn’t find anything, so you’re just looking for dirt!” or something like that. The same class of “journalist” who went digging through Brett Kavanaugh’s life in order to make sure they didn’t miss a thing, is now giving Joe Biden a level of deference that they haven’t handed out since the alleged assailant had the last name Clinton.

To the media, “Believe All Women” really means “believe only the women who accuse people we don’t like,” and that some claims of sexual assault are more “equal” than others.

Welcome Instapundit Readers!

Featured image via Pixabay, cropped, Pixabay license

Written by

3 Comments
  • Wfjag says:

    Is this the same NYT that summarily declared the influence peddling while Joe Biden was VP to get exceptionally lucrative deals for Hunter Biden from a Ukrainian oil & gas oligarch and the Bank of China to be Conspiracy Theories?

    Thought so.

  • Joe in PNG says:

    This kind of feeds into my belief that the Dems are planning on writing off this year- and considering the consequences of the lockdown, it’s understandable.

    If they wanted to win, this would be a good opportunity to dump Groping Joe, and pick someone else who has an actual chance. But, they might just win, and have to actually do things to get the economy actually working again- then get blamed if it doesn’t work out.

    But, if Trump wins, they get 4 more years of naysaying and griping and complaining (without having to do ANYTHING!), while secretly hoping he gets things back on track for 2024. At that point, the odds will be heavily in their favor, and they can take credit for all the good stuff set into motion ala Bill Clinton.

  • Paul Izzo says:

    Translation: Biden is dirty, creepy old man. But he is our man.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead
Instagram
Instagram did not return a 200.