Abolish I.C.E. Immediately, Not So Fast, Kirsten

Abolish I.C.E. Immediately, Not So Fast, Kirsten

Abolish I.C.E. Immediately, Not So Fast, Kirsten

Completely devoid of any ideas and in the grips of identity politics and educated yet ignorant child socialists, the Democrat Party chases every shiny object it sees. In the name of all that’s holy, please don’t yell “squirrel” near a Democrat. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (Dense-NY) wants to abolish ICE immediately, once the Democrats take back the House and Senate.

Senator Gillibrand appeared on stage with Chelsea Handler, above, at Ozyfest, the same Central Park gathering where Old Granny Clinton spewed her latest delusion. And, what did dear Kirsten have to contribute to move the conversation forward? Let’s watch the video:

Let’s pick apart “Immigration Barbie’s” droppings, shall we? The Daily Caller posted her comments. From the article:

“So when we flip the House and flip the Senate, I think the first thing we should do is deal with the children who have been separated from their families at the border. I think we should get rid of ICE,” Gillibrand said at the New York City festival OZY Fest, where she shared a stage with left-wing actress Chelsea Handler.

Oh, darlin’ girl. Why were those children separated from the adults with them when they illegally crossed our Country’s borders? Because the adults could not legally verify that the children belonged to them. And, the adults had committed the crime of illegally crossing the border. We separate parents and children everyday here in the U.S.A. when the parents commit a crime. We do it in the best interests of the children, right. Get rid of I.C.E.? F’realz, playa? I.C.E. was created in 2002 within the Homeland Security Act. Hillary Clinton was then in the Senate seat now occupied by Miss Gillibrand. Hillary voted yes to create I.C.E..

More from the article:

“We should separate out two missions, the anti-terrorism mission, the national security mission, and then on the other side make sure you’re do, making sure you’re looking at immigration as a humanitarian issue,”

Look girl, we just want the border to be secured. Immigration and requests for asylum are a humanitarian issues. Illegal immigration is a national security mission. Legal immigration is handled under the Department of Homeland Security (of which I.C.E. is a branch) by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). USCIS is responsible for providing immigration-related services such as processing immigrant and nonimmigrant benefits; adjudicating refugee, asylee, and naturalization petitions; and granting or denying work authorization.

And, why am I explaining this to you? Shouldn’t you as a Senator know this already?

and finally from the article:

“These are civil issues, these are families, look at it as the economic engine that it is, that immigration is our strength, our diversity is what makes our country and our economy so strong,” she said.

You can say that Kristen, but that doesn’t make it true. The hard working men and women of the United States of America, the small business owners, and those who put capital at risk are the economic engine of our Country. Immigration can be a strength, if we allow in the right immigrants and, yes, there is such a thing as the right immigrants. Diversity can make our Country and economy strong, if the individuals are intelligent and hardworking. Diversity in and of its own self is of zero value.

Y’all won’t abolish I.C.E.. I don’t think you’ll flip either the House or the Senate. You don’t have the personnel or the ideas.

That is all.

Written by

  • Robin H says:

    They’re saying abolish ICE, but then they say to make a new agency to handle what ICE does. So they’re really not abolishing ICE, they’re renaming it and probably adding more layers of administration. I don’t think that’s what their followers are really thinking when they yell to abolish it. They’re not really listening to what the politicians are saying.

    • GWB says:

      And this is new, somehow? Vast numbers of voters haven’t really been listening to politicians for a long time.

  • Skid Marx says:

    The religion of peace comrades would love it if we had no border or control over what comes across but the democrats need that permanent underclass of lifetime voters and to hell with border security.
    I have an online article from years ago by an Arizona news paper where middle eastern baddies are schooled on how to look and act Hispanic. There would be no need to act “Hispanic” if there were no border or controls over it.

  • helltoupee says:

    I (mis)read the title of this article as: “Abolish I.C.E. Immediately, Not So Fast, Kitten”. For some reason, I like that better

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner