Tuesday Primary: Will Minnesota Voters Fire Ilhan Omar?

Tuesday Primary: Will Minnesota Voters Fire Ilhan Omar?

Tuesday Primary: Will Minnesota Voters Fire Ilhan Omar?

Another day, another primary. And today’s is significant: it will decide if the Minnesota voters in the district represented by “Ilhan Omar” will boot her out after just one term.

And that’s a big “if.” Because voters have already retained al least two “squad” members who’d like nothing more than to burn America to the ground.

But if recent reports are accurate, her Minnesotan constituents—many of whom are Somalian refugees who emigrated to America legally and didn’t marry their siblings—are just as disgusted with the queen of Some People Did Something as are the rest of us regular folks. And it’s all about the list of multiple felonies she very likely committed.

As explained to and by The Blaze’s Glenn Beck this past April:

So let’s briefly review the allegations against Ms. “Omar” (which, according to reports, t’aint her real name):

She married her brother. Now, it’s not in the way, say, a pedophilic person like Jeffrey Epstein would marry his sister. No, it had nothing to do with craven sexual attractions to children or one’s own family members, and everything to do with committing immigration fraud: First, Ms. Whatever-Her-Real-Name-Is piggybacked onto another family of Somalian refugees and made her way into America. And then, years later, her brother became her brusband, and voila, green card.

And then there’s the campaign finance violations that she and at least two other freshman “squad” members have allegedly committed, with the screaming howler monkey that is Rashida Tlaib having her hand slapped for same by the ever-so-ethical House Ethics Committee just a few days ago. Just a little fine and she’ll be on her way to a—gag—second term.

And let’s not forget student-loan fraud, as well as tax fraud:

Almost certainly, Rep. Omar fraudulently married her brother, a British citizen, in the service of immigration fraud, education fraud, and federal student loan fraud. Along the way, she filed at least two years of fraudulent tax returns, and possibly eight. She lived in several different subsidized housing units during this time. She likely received subsidized health care and child care during this time. For eight years, every application she signed for state and federal aid was likely fraudulent. During her 2017 divorce from Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, Ilhan submitted a nine-question statement to the court signed under penalty of perjury. Literally — she signed just below the statement of acknowledgment. Eight of her nine answers appear to be perjurious. Each instance is punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment.”

“The paperwork she signed for her successful 2016 run and two-year tenure as a Minnesota state representative may contain instances of perjury as well.”

And then there’s the sin Ms. “Omar” committed that, in her prior life in Somalia, would have seen her buried in a hole and stoned to death at the hand of Islam: adultery. Yes, she’s a homewrecker, too, and profiting from it by paying her newest husband’s consulting firm—and, thus, by extension, herself—more than a million dollars from her own campaign coffers in 2020 alone.

Can we say “nepotism,” and hypocrisy, at the very least?

Yes, we can:

https://twitter.com/TheRewster/status/1292835078079311873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1292835078079311873%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthespectator.info%2F2020%2F08%2F10%2Fsisters-shouldnt-marry-their-brothers-period-ilhan-omars-dig-at-billionaires-profiting-off-the-pandemic-backfires-spectacularly%2F

Being an insufferable loather of America and capitalism sure pays well, eh?

And that’s just the short list of her alleged felonies.

The immigration fraud allegations lobbed against Ms. “Omar” should have seen her deported before she ever became an ugly fixture in American politics, but didn’t. Why? This is why:

A key clue as to why there will be no prosecution can be seen in the fact that Omar has accused those who have researched her unusual marital arrangements of ‘Islamophobia.’ Ilhan Omar is a leftist, a black person, a woman, and a Muslim. These are the reasons why she will not be prosecuted. Anyone who dared to prosecute her would be excoriated in the establishment media as a racist ‘Islamophobe’; few have the courage to stand up against that onslaught.”

So will the growing list of additional felonies also be ignored?

Probably. Because methinks “black Muslim woman” is the real “privilege” in America today.

Which is why the only way to rid our House of “Omar’s” lawlessness—not to mention the danger she and her “squad” present to our constitutional republic at large—is today’s primary.

Ms. “Ilhan Omar”—who routinely plays the “Islamophobe” card like a first-chair violinist—should be fired by her Minnesota constituents, not because she “speaks truth to power” (how utterly laughable, The Nation), but because she’s more-than-likely a multiple felon and unethical as the day is long. And then, if we truly have equal justice, she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, just as you or I would be had we engaged in a fraction of what it looks like she’s done. And then deported back to whence she came.

After all, if the people who make our laws aren’t made to abide by them, too, then why the hell should we?

The questions are this: Will Americans of all stripes begin demanding integrity of those who write the laws they compel the rest of us to follow? Or will we keep electing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result (like, say, the insanity of choosing the biggest statist imaginable as our next president? C’mon, man!). Because if we lose the rule of law, chaos and violence will engulf America in the same way it has in cities like Portland and Chicago, where there is lawlessness and anarchy, and a growing number of those becoming increasingly weary of it. And soon, should we continue down this path, America will look more and more like the third-world shit-hole that birthed ‘ol what’s-her-name. And that’s not an America any of us should want for our children, because there’s no Making Mogadishu Great Again. Ever.

If you’re so inclined, you can watch the “Ilhan Omar” primary election results here. Here’s hoping this anti-Semitic, America-hating, Islamic terrorist-sympathizing stain on our House is wiped clean.

 

Welcome Instapundit readers!

Feature Image Credit: Gage Skidmore via Flikr; CC BY-SA 2.0 license; image cropped

Written by

6 Comments
  • GWB says:

    t’aint her real name
    Really? You used that ‘abbreviation’? Because the homophone for that has certainly been used about her in comments I’ve read….

    A key clue as to why there will be no prosecution
    She’s a member of a protected class. Which we’re not supposed to have in America. (I know, I know.)

    Because methinks “black Muslim woman” is the real “privilege” in America today.
    No, if there were a black muslim gay woman running against her, there might be some possibility of her being defeated….

    who routinely plays the “Islamophobe” card like a first-chair violinist
    Oh, please. More like a busker trumpeter with a harelip – it’s loud, but not any artistry.

    And then deported back to whence she came.
    Actually, that part might not be doable. She was a minor when brought here, and obtained her citizenship through her ‘family’ when she became an adult (IIRC). I’m not sure you can strip her citizenship like you could someone who emigrated (like her brother/husband) as an adult.

    Will Americans of all stripes begin demanding integrity
    They really can’t. Not until they understand the fundamental laws of the land (the Constitution) and the underpinnings of it (English Common Law and Natural Law). Only when they understand that, and zealously desire to protect it will the miscreants who would rule us begin to face appropriate consequences.

    the biggest statist imaginable as our next president
    Oh please. I can imagine statists a lot worse than Biden. (Some of them are probably advising/running him.) 0bama, for one. (The one that isn’t a golfer, I mean. Please, the other one was nothing but a patsy, living his life grifting off of his being half-black and his novelty upbringing.) Bernie for another.

    Because if we lose the rule of law
    Personally, I think we need to regain the rule of law.

    BTW, given the “you’re on your own” message the cops gave in Seattle, the people need to band together within their communities and form their own law enforcement with patrols and such. In the end, that will be more likely than much else to restore the idea of civic duty and citizenship in America. Because giving that up to “professionals” is what started us down this long slope to statism.

  • D3F1ANT says:

    They’ll re-elect this abomination of a human being. Voters, especially Democrat voters, rarely (if ever) seem to learn from even their most disastrous mistakes.

  • Mimi says:

    She’s currently got about a 20% lead over her opponent.

    • Just Passing Though says:

      I won’t be surprised if she win the primary or the general election.
      Ideology is more important than competency or results.

  • Mimi says:

    No edit button (that I could see).
    Edit: A 20 point lead.

  • GWB says:

    We pessimists were right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead