Who Will Disarm Us Now?
Who Will Disarm Us Now?
Now that Beto O’Rourke’s candidacy is relegated to the trash heap of history where it belongs, and derpy turnip Eric
Swalwell Smallballs hurred and durred his way out of the 2020 Democratic primary, who will disarm the vulnerable?
Not that I really believed that either Smallballs or Robert Francis had any capability to disarm anyone, both these awkward, weird, creepy tool wagons talked a good disarmament game.
Remember when Smallballs reminded a reader that the government would nuke them if they refused to turn over the big, black, scary guns that resulted in much soiled pantiage all over Washington? Remember when O’Rourke threatened door-to-door confiscation if Americans refused to abide by his diktats to turn over their property to the government?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
So now that those two potatoes are out of the race, who will step in to threaten ordinary Americans with forcible confiscation of the most popular rifle in the United States?
Who will disarm pregnant women, using AR-15s to defend their unborn babies and their husbands from getting beaten to death by armed goblins invading their home?
[Jeremy] King said one of the men started pistol-whipping him while another kicked him repeatedly in the head. His wife, who is eight months pregnant, was in the back bedroom and peeked out to see what was going on.
King said one of the men shot at her. She retreated, grabbed an AR-15 and returned fire.
We know that all the 2020 Democrats vying for the White House support a licensing scheme for gun owners, which while supposedly not meant to disarm us, will sure give government authoritarians a handy little list they could use to start their confiscation efforts.
Sorry, guys. You can’t disarm me. Tragic boating accident and all that.
Some have also issued support for buyback programs, including former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. Biden, who authored the 1994 assault weapons ban, is in favor of universal background checks and renewing a ban on assault weapons. However, he has yet to release a detailed plan on gun control reform.
Castro, who unveiled a gun policy after the El Paso shooting, also came out in support of buybacks. In the past, Castro has described buybacks as having “had mixed success,” but as being “good policy” in some circumstances.
Warren, who did not include support for buybacks in her gun policy announced in the wake of the El Paso and Dayton shootings, described her focus on reducing the power of the NRA, putting $100 million annually toward gun safety research and reducing gun deaths in the country by 80%.
Just so we’re all on the same page, let’s quickly provide you with the gun-grabber thesaurus – a convenient little guide to explain what the Democrats mean when they say…
Buyback program: a scheme to relieve you of your property using government force and pretending that justice was done because you are given a nominal payment using your own tax dollars, even though you were not permitted to set a fair value for said property.
Assault weapon: any gun that looks scary and black and shoots bullets and stuff.
Universal background checks: elimination of your right to dispose of your own property without government involvement driving up the price of said property and making it cost prohibitive for poor people.
Mixed success: the gun grabber policy didn’t work, but they want to implement it anyway to pretend they’re doing something about “gun violence.”
Good policy: anything that infringes on your right to keep and bear arms.
Reducing the power of the NRA: maligning and ultimately shuttering an organization of millions of law-abiding citizens, hindering their right of association with one another.
Gun safety research: Doctored data that supports infringements on the right to keep and bear arms. (Example: Arthur Kellerman’s discredited “research” that claims a gun in the home is likely to increase homicide in the home.)
Reducing gun deaths: disarming innocent people, who had nothing to do with said death.
So who will disarm Jeremy King’s wife?
Who will disarm residents protecting themselves from home invading goblins?
Who will disarm good Samaritans defending others from attack?
Kamala Harris, STEP ON UP!
Kamala plans to disarm Americans because “assault weapons kill babies and police officers” (but she’s all in for killing them in the uterus with a pair of salad tongs or a shop vac) and will use her metaphorical “pen and phone” to infringe on our rights, because Congress – which is supposed to represent the American people – refuses to do so.
Harris has recently shuttered her offices and fired staff in New Hampshire, and questioned whether the American people are ready for a woman of color to be president (and by “people,” she means her own party, since this is the Democratic primary, thereby calling Democrats racists and misogynists).
I can’t lie. I’m amused at Harris’s free fall, but I will miss Beto’s awkward but entertaining attempts to pretend to be just a normal guy of the people, instead of a spoiled millionaire, threatening Americans with confiscation of their property and stumbling to correct himself to preserve the “illusion” that he and the Democrats somehow respect the Second Amendment.