SCOTUS Seat Empty – Who Will Fill It?

SCOTUS Seat Empty – Who Will Fill It?

SCOTUS Seat Empty – Who Will Fill It?

The stakes for the 2020 election – if they weren’t high enough already – were just exponentially raised with the death of Justice Ginsburg.

An empty SCOTUS seat could potentially energize this race in a way we haven’t seen before, but if President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have their way, it might be a moot point. McConnell has already announced his intentions to get a candidate moving, and President Trump is right there with him.


While liberals shriek about “the McConnell rule,” conveniently forgetting that the reason McConnell would not advance President Obama’s pick is because the White House and the Senate were controlled by opposite parties, which none other than Joe Biden himself also agreed with, President Trump already released a second list of potential SCOTUS picks just a little over a week ago. I’m sure that he never expected that it would become a hot talking point in ten days’ time.

Now that the theoretical has become the real, that list is quickly being narrowed down in the media. Everyone remembers – and carries scars from – the brutality and viciousness of the Kavanaugh confirmation battle. I am making a guess, and it might be a good one, that between Ginsburg being replaced on the court, and what happened to Justice Kavanaugh, that the next pick that President Trump makes will be a woman.

And given the list of superbly qualified women on his list, it will be easy to choose a very good candidate for the court. The problem becomes choosing only ONE candidate for SCOTUS.

The prominent names on the president’s potential SCOTUS picks that are women include names that have come up before, like Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Britt Grant of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, and Judge Joan Larsen of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Other names that are now being added to that list are Judge Allison Eid of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, and Judge Barbara Lagoa of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Out of these five names, Judge Lagoa’s name is drawing some quick and early interest, especially because the New York Times is now reporting that President Trump’s short list contains only three names – Amy Coney Barrett, Amul Thapar (who is on the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, and he would be the first Indian American on the court), and Barbara Lagoa.


Judge Lagoa’s biography is an impressive one, which includes Columbia Law School and time on the Florida Supreme Court. Her Cuban-American heritage would make her an excellent counterpoint to Justice Sotomayor. She has only been on the 11th Circuit bench for less than a year, though. Is she ready to make that jump?

Judge Barrett’s biography has been more well-known and examined because her name has been on the list for a longer period of time. Barrett is a former Scalia law clerk, on the faculty of Notre Dame Law School, and is seen as a favorite pick.

Judge Thupar, who is a reported protégé of Mitch McConnell, is from Kentucky and the son of Indian immigrants. He has been on the 6th Circuit court since 2017, which isn’t a lot of time, but more than Judge Lagoa has had.

Most importantly, Judge Barrett is 48. Judge Lagoa is 52. Judge Thapar is 51. Any of them would be younger than Gorsuch and Kavanaugh right now by just a few years. Judge Ginsburg was 60 when she was made a SCOTUS justice, and served 27 years. In putting younger judges on the list, President Trump is looking at the long game of the Supreme Court.

Be sure that any choice is going to be torn to shreds by the Democrats, the hard left, and the press (but I repeat myself). The question is which of these top three candidates wants to be on the Supreme Court badly enough to have their entire life turned upside down in rapid fashion. And if they decline, which name then moves up on the list?

I don’t think we can be reminded to brace ourselves for the onslaught to come often enough.

Featured image via Pixabay, cropped, Pixabay license

Written by

4 Comments
  • Frank J. Derfler says:

    Very nice article. Better information and insight than I’ve seen anywhere else!

  • Cameron says:

    Whoever is chosen, we’re going to know everything about them from high school indiscretions to saying something mean about a colored person in college within the first week. Nothing that can be proven of course but that’s not the point.

  • Mary says:

    I’m sure the scandalmongers are in full swing right now.

  • GWB says:

    because the White House and the Senate were controlled by opposite parties
    AND the president was not up for re-election. He was a lame duck.

    The problem becomes choosing only ONE candidate for SCOTUS.
    So, nominate three! The Dems have been talking about adding two justices, so do it for them!
    (That seems like a quintessential Trumpian move. Feed their own crap right back to ’em!)

    “How do Democrats in the Senate vote against a Latina?”
    “The same way they voted against a black?”
    C’mon, people, that’s an eminently stupid statement.

    a reported protégé of Mitch McConnell
    Ummm, that is actually not a point in her favor, imo.

    Judge Lagoa is 52.
    Sorry, but Ms Lagoa is … those squinty eyes with big cheeks make her non-trustworthy to me. She looks artificial. Weird, given that she’s in her 50s. (But the Cuban-American bit is a definite plus.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead
Instagram
Instagram did not return a 200.