NOW Hags Target Hooters, Claiming The Restaurant Sells Sex To Kids

NOW Hags Target Hooters, Claiming The Restaurant Sells Sex To Kids

Originally posted at David Horowitz’s Newsreal:

Hooters squares off against anti-Hooters feminazi Patty Bellasalma.

When you think of a “sex establishment”, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? If you answered something along the lines of a strip club or an adult novelty store, then congratulations — you’re a normal American. Usually, an establishment needs to actually sell sex-related goods in order to be considered a sex establishment. For the National Organization of Women, that’s just far too narrow a description of a sex store. To them, all that’s needed for an establishment to be accused of selling sex is attractive female employees — and so, of course, they’re targeting Hooters. Apparently, by hiring attractive women to work in the restaurant wearing skimpy clothes, Hooters is not only selling sex, but they’re selling sex to children. Oh, the humanity!

The rabid femisogynist leading this ridiculous charge is Patty Bellasalma, pictured above. (Does the difference in the two pictures explain her hostility towards Hooters?) Patty is the president of NOW’s California chapter, and she is just trying to look out for the children. They aren’t looking out for the womyn this time — nope, it’s for the kids.

The National Organization for Women filed complaints against local Hooters restaurants Thursday, but not for exploiting its scantily clad waitresses by subjecting them to leering and groping customers.

The subject this time was Hooters’ catering to children.

The restaurants in San Francisco, San Bruno, Sacramento and Orange County are classified as “adult entertainment” establishments but also serve minors, NOW’s California chapter said in papers filed with police and prosecutors.

What’s more, the organization said, Hooters provides child menus, high chairs and booster seats, and sells T-shirts in children’s sizes that identify the wearer as a “Future Hooters Girl.”

Patricia Bellasalma, NOW’s California president, asserted that Hooters is violating state and local laws prohibiting sexually oriented “adult” businesses from serving minors. The chain is also violating federal employment standards, she said.

Hooters’ stance on the subject is that they do not cater to children and families, but that they serve everyone who comes into the restaurant. The horror! Don’t they know that they’re selling sex to children?!

Oh, wait… they don’t. Apparently, they’re just too ignorant to understand that skimpy clothes automatically equal sex. So, of course, NOW will be campaigning to keep children away from beaches and swimming pools next, right? After all, women wear far less to the beach than any Hooters girl wears, so naturally that’s a sexual environment as well. And I guess we should also add in television, pop concerts, the mall, fashion billboards … anything else that features scantily-clad women? We can’t have children in a XXX environment, after all, and NOW’s new position is that women in skimpy clothes are obviously sex workers.

Is there really any wonder why femisogynists are so scorned in today’s America?

British feminazis recently tried to block the opening of a Hooters, complaining that Hooters is worse than Playboy. Right — a restaurant whose waitresses wear shorts and tank tops is worse than a magazine that features graphic pictures of nude women. Is the real issue here that man-hating femifascists cannot stand the idea of an establishment that — gasp!! — caters to men? Obviously, if femisogynists don’t like something, no one should be allowed to enjoy it.

And this boils down to the heart of the issue. It’s amazing how anti-choice feminazis are, considering how they claim to be such champions for choice. True equality for women means that women can choose to forge a life for themselves, whether that means being a stay-at-home mom, building a career in corporate America, or working at a place like Hooters. It isn’t something that femisogynists should have any say over, but make a choice that they disagree with and you’ll be shamed right out of the sisterhood. Dress in a skimpy outfit in a restaurant that largely caters to men, and you’ll definitely be out of the club.

What Ms. Bellasalma can’t seem to wrap her puny mind around is that parents have the choice to take their kids with them to Hooters. While no one would ever call Hooters a classy establishment, it’s not nearly as bad as NOW is trying to make it out to be. It’s a sports bar with mediocre food and attractive women wearing shorts and a tank top. Children don’t get exposed to sex at Hooters anymore than they would seeing women wearing bikinis at the beach. And while I would never buy my daughter a shirt that says “Future Hooters Girl,” I would also never try to ban other parents from doing so. Advocating for real choice means that you don’t get to dictate the choices people make, but that goes against everything that today’s modern feminazis stand for.

Nevermind that women willingly work at Hooters. Nevermind that some parents willingly patronize Hooters with their children. It’s not their choice to make — it’s NOW’s choice to make. (And you thought modern feminism was about women being able to make their own choices!)

It’s rather disturbing that femisogynists can, with a straight face, campaign so rabidly for abortion and yet somehow still claim to be fighting for the children. It’s also disturbing that an organization that claims to work on behalf of women would waste their time on something so insignificant, while continually ignoring the abuses and oppression forced onto women in the Middle East, thanks to the barbarism of sharia. Women are forced to endure beatings, oppression, female genital mutilation, and even stoning — yet the National Organization for Women is wasting its time going after an American sports bar.

And they call themselves feminists. It’s a clear example why most parents would rather take their daughters to Hooters wearing a “Future Hooters Girl” shirt than take them to a NOW rally wearing a “Future NOW Member” shirt. At least at Hooters, women can make their own choices. You can’t really say the same for the mindless sheep led by Patty Bellasalma at NOW.

Written by

  • Janelle says:

    Gate grope would be another cause for NOW or the hideous sexual slavery which exists in the US.

  • RogerB says:

    It’s very apparent to me of the appearance envy this NOW hog has against Hooter’s girls. She probably never looked 1/4 as good as most Hooter’s waitress even when she was 20 or so. She was probably just a young dawg then also.

    Yes, I’m male. I go to Hooter’s on occasion. But to bring up the Children issue just goes to show what NOW is made of. A complete membership of losser women.

    Enough said…

  • Rose says:

    Wait a minute, I thought they were all for casual sex and teaching kindergartners to use condoms. Hooters should be right up their alley.

  • I R A Darth Aggie says:

    So, they’re advocating the adoption of orange & white burkas at Hooters?

  • WhiteRose says:

    OK, I’m drunk right now & that feminist is ugly…tomorrow I will be sober & she will still be ugly.

  • Aw, now you’ve gone and got me craving their hot wings again. And that’s really all I go for–just for the wings–I swear.

  • Rignerd says:

    So why don’t they go after all the other places that market sex to our children, like Disney. As a father of 5 I will not take my kids to a first run showing of a movie, even G rated, with out pre-screening it to make sure they don’t have a ton of sexual references, innuendo and sexuality.
    They have done a great job of identifying violence. Unfortunately they are unable to differentiate moral violence (US soldier wins WWII) from immoral violence (Freak with chainsaw kills coeds).
    So now they are unable to differentiate between a pretty girl selling food and a notorious skank like Paris Hilton.

  • Cindy says:

    I love women. I love men. I even love hot wings. I also love families having the freedom to decide what is appropriate for themselves, so I’m definitely not in favor of whatever it is this old bat is after. I agree with her that skimpy, sexy clothes are inappropriate for a family environment. Of course, I am quite free not to go to Hooters, and I don’t find myself offended by them because (surprise) I don’t GO THERE, especially with my kids. Good grief. This lady, and her fellow NOWbats need to get a life and let other people live theirs. We’ll just let God sort all that stuff out in the end.

  • SgtEric says:

    I love how Fiano tries to play the conservative, then viciously attacks service members who are conservative.

    Oh, but that’s right, she’s related to one so she’s exempt from criticism.

  • Punisher says:


    Cry me a river.

  • ricky says:

    Justin Timberlake

  • lil'vina says:

    i so agree with this 100%. you won’t go after the women who are suffering in middle eastern countries and young girls forced into prostitution but will attack a restaurant for women who do have clothes on? if parents really have a problem with hooters why send them there? but i see they’re not complaining because they came for food, not the women. can’t women express themselves without being judged negatively? you don’t have to like hooters but what gives someone to constantly bash women for doing what they want? i don’t agree with women who strip, prostitute, or anything that’s sexual but am i going to be all mad about it? no. i never looked at hooter girls as degrading or objectifying women when they are trying to make a living for themselves. they use the word “degrade”, “exploit” a little too much and if you do use it, use it for something that actually mean something. if we get rid of hooters then we need to get rid of strip clubs, clean up prostitution, ban porn, anything that involves sex. i consider myself a feminist but some tend to give that word a bad name because of how they act.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner