John Brennan Steps On a Rake. [VIDEO]

John Brennan Steps On a Rake. [VIDEO]

John Brennan Steps On a Rake. [VIDEO]

By now you’ve heard that President Trump snatched the security clearance of former CIA director John Brennan. And as a result, Brennan is hopping mad.

So he vented his spleen in an opinion piece in the New York Times, published Thursday.

“President Trump’s claims of no collusion are hogwash,” declared Brennan. He then wove a tale of how he, John Brennan, chief CIA spook, knew instinctively that the Russians were lying when they denied election interference. And super patriot Brennan told the head of Russian internal security service to knock it off during a 2016 phone call:

“When I warned Mr. Bortnikov that Russian interference in our election was intolerable and would roil United States-Russia relations for many years, he denied Russian involvement in any election, in America or elsewhere, with a feigned sincerity that I had heard many times before. President Vladimir Putin of Russia reiterated those denials numerous times over the past two years, often to Donald Trump’s seeming approval.”

Brennan then wrote of how he took his concerns to FBI head James Comey. They both agreed that the Russians were up to no good. They shared fears that unwitting Americans could be “pawns in Russian hands.” Russian goals, Brennan wrote, were to “undermine public faith in the American democratic process, harm the electability of the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, and show preference for Mr. Trump.”

Frankly, I think Brennan’s biggest butt hurt was about Hillary’s failed electability, but I digress.

So what did Brennan do about this these alarms?

john brennan

Nothing. Two-and-a-half months went by between that phone call and the election. Russian aggression went into overdrive. Yet not a thing was done about it.

Now part of that fustercluck could also fall on the head of Brennan’s boss, too. All Obama did was to tell Putin at a G-20 summit to back off, whereupon Putin smelled fear and continued meddling in the election.

But there’s more.

Sen. Richard Burr, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, says that Brennan’s claim that Trump colluded with the Russians could be an ‘intelligence breach.’ Here’s how Burr explained it:

“If Director Brennan’s statement is based on intelligence he received while still leading the CIA, why didn’t he include it in the Intelligence Community Assessment released in 2017? If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach.”

Hmm. Furthermore, Burr said, if John Brennan has that kind of information, he should be informing proper authorities — and that’s not the media:

“If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion it should be disclosed to the Special Counsel, not the New York Times.”

So what, exactly, is this evidence of collusion Brennan refers to?

It was this statement from Trump on the campaign trail:

Yep, that was it. Trump made a smart-ass joke, and Brennan took it literally. As Brennan wrote in the NYT:

“. . . when Mr. Trump, then a presidential candidate, publicly called upon Russia to find the missing emails of Mrs. Clinton. By issuing such a statement, Mr. Trump was not only encouraging a foreign nation to collect intelligence against a United States citizen. . .”

Yeah, that’s some real super-secret collusion there — demand in front of thousands of people that Russia dig up Hillary’s emails. My head hurts from so much eye-rolling.

Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams said that the problem is because John Brennan ‘can’t understand an obvious joke:’

“So Brennan may have started one of the most important political witch hunts in history based on not recognizing a joke — and I’m not even making that up.”

Adams also agrees that Brennan deserved to lose his security clearance:

“Now, if you’ve got a guy who’s willing to put the entire stability at risk because he can’t tell the difference between a joke and a serious statement, then that guy has got to lose his security clearance at least. I wouldn’t want him anywhere near a decision. Would you? After seeing how Brennan responded to a public joke would you want him to make any important decisions about anything? I mean, that’s some scary stuff.”

But then, if you looked like Walter from Jeff Dunham’s puppet show, maybe you wouldn’t have much of a sense of humor either.

john brennan walter

It looks like the pompous ass John Brennan really stepped on a rake with that NYT op-ed. Losing security clearance. It couldn’t have happened to a more deserving guy.

Written by

Kim is a pint-sized patriot who packs some big contradictions. She is a Baby Boomer who never became a hippie, an active Republican who first registered as a Democrat (okay, it was to help a sorority sister's father in his run for sheriff), and a devout Lutheran who practices yoga. Growing up in small-town Indiana, now living in the Kansas City metro, Kim is a conservative Midwestern gal whose heart is also in the Seattle area, where her eldest daughter, son-in-law, and grandson live. Kim is a working speech pathologist who left school system employment behind to subcontract to an agency, and has never looked back. She describes her conservatism as falling in the mold of Russell Kirk's Ten Conservative Principles. Don't know what they are? Google them!

  • Nicki says:

    The problem with Brennan’s editorial is that he’s correct about Russian interference, but then slides into conjecture about the Trump Administration’s alleged “collusion,” which has never been proven and has never been assessed by the IC. So, he’s using some facts about Russian interference to bolster his conjecture. It’s stupid. No one ever assessed that Trump colluded with Russia, and he makes himself sound like a jackass when he makes those claims based on the fact that Russia worked to impact the election.

    Minor quibble about nothing being done though. There were actions, but unfortunately they were SLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWW.

  • Kate says:

    Evidently, not only Mr. Communist/Muslim Brennon but most leftist have no concept of a sense of humor, if I remember correctly most of the real Russian communist and certainly Chinese communist were dour, dry sour pusses, they only laughed at the people they prosecuted and murdered.

  • GWB says:

    Russian goals, Brennan wrote, were to “undermine public faith in the American democratic process,”
    And, how would working toward that goal differ in any way from what the progressives have done since 2008? (Really 1908 or so.)

    Russian aggression went into overdrive.
    Meh. Is that like the overdrive on a Lada?

    Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams
    What does it say of us that a cartoonist (with some pretty bad ideas, based on one of his non-comic books I read) is now one of the most rational political commentators in our country?

    And, yes, absolutely, Brennan should have his clearance revoked. It never should have been granted in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner