Previous post
Dr. Anthony Fauci was lauded at the beginning of the pandemic as a calm, stable voice in the midst of a lot of confusion and rapidly changing information.
As time has gone on, Fauci has proven to be the equivalent of the school nerd who suddenly finds himself prom king. The media, desperate to keep yelling Orange Man Bad, pitted Fauci against Trump and hoped for fireworks. And Fauci, finding himself to be the center of attention, began to believe his own press. He had RESPECT. He got his own bobblehead! He was on the cover of Vanity Fair! Celebrities wanted to talk to him! He got to throw out the first pitch at a Nationals game!
As the information on COVID changed, so did Fauci, but he never admitted that he had actually changed his mind. We have seen examples of this with mask-wearing especially, where he discouraged people from wearing masks, and then months later admitted to “the noble lie” – he had lied about masks in order to make sure hospitals and other care facilities had enough PPE. He also did this in regards to schools, first advising to close them all, then hedging his bets even as the evidence rolled in about how the virus was not nearly as much a danger to children as it is to the elderly, to finally pushing for reopening.
Is it really any wonder that trust in public health officials has steadily eroded? And, as a friend of mine pointed out, Fauci is NOT a public health doctor. He’s an immunologist. His area of expertise is in figuring out how viruses like HIV (his previous work) and COVID-19 work, not creating the public health policy to go with it. Public relations is not part of what Fauci has ever learned to do. But thrust into the spotlight and high on his own glowing media coverage, Fauci began to spin with the best of them.
And now, caught again in another lie about moving the goalposts on herd immunity, the New York Times is willing to give Fauci a pass, because, again, it is a “noble lie” for “the greater good.”
When you can't just "trust the science" because the scientists keep lying to you and then saying, "oh, that was just a noble lie, sorry about that."https://t.co/2SKAiGiBto pic.twitter.com/hl06rjM7tA
— Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) December 24, 2020
Why is Fauci lying to the American public on what it will take to get us to herd immunity? Because we’re all too stupid to accept his version of the truth, and we all need to fall in line like sheep.
This quote, which has been rightfully making the rounds, really tells the whole tale. Asked why he changed his mind about how much vaccination would result in herd immunity, Fauci said, “When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent … Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ‘I can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85. We need to have some humility here …. We really don’t know what the real number is. I think the real range is somewhere between 70 to 90 percent. But, I’m not going to say 90 percent.”
This is a problem. Fauci is clearly admitting that he was not simply telling the American people what he believed to be true, he was instead trying to manipulate us into behaving how he wants. And it’s not the first time. Back in March, Fauci told Americans not to wear masks. He now claims he did so largely because he feared a shortage. So, once again, instead of just giving us the unvarnished scientific truth, as he understood it, he told us only what he thought it was good for us to know.”
And politicians like Marco Rubio are paying attention. You can disagree with Rubio about a lot of things, but he isn’t wrong about Fauci.
Dr. Fauci lied about masks in March
Dr. Fauci has been distorting the level of vaccination needed for herd immunity
It isn’t just him
Many in elite bubbles believe the American public doesn’t know “what’s good for them” so they need to be tricked into “doing the right thing”
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) December 27, 2020
You know who else is paying attention to what Fauci said then versus what he’s saying now? CNN’s Dana Bash. Yes, stop the presses, someone on CNN committed an act of journalism and made Dr. Fauci squirm.
.@DanaBashCNN presses Dr. Fauci on his comments about “moving the goal posts” on herd immunity based on polling. "Why weren’t you straight with the American people about this to begin with?” she asks.
He deflects multiple times. She presses and he says it’s just a “guesstimate." pic.twitter.com/kquQvlwZ8j
— Steve Krakauer (@SteveKrak) December 27, 2020
Fauci’s credibility took a hard hit with that one, and kudos to Dana Bash for pushing him about this. Why should anyone, the media included, listen to what Fauci says now, when they aren’t sure if he will be straight with them in order to serve “the greater good.” (For the record, the media doesn’t care if Fauci lies to the American public. THEY just don’t want to be lied to, so if Fauci had told them that he was moving the goalposts for “the greater good,” they would have been fine with that. They want to be in on the lie.)
This pandemic has proved to be fatal to the trust in many public institutions, and public health is one of them. COVID exposed so many of these cracks in society that I don’t know how we ever really get back to normal again. But one way to start would be for those who purport to be advocating for our best interests to tell the whole, unvarnished truth up front. Of course, Fauci and others actually doing that would expose yet another problem. This was never about telling the truth. This was all about power and control.
Welcome Instapundit Readers!
Featured image: Dr. Anthony Fauci at a press briefing, March 31, 2020 (Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks, public domain)
Spot on. Disseminating throughout social media.
the real crime is how many tyrants in positions of power (judge and their medical advisors) take this bureaucrat Doctor’s words as absolute “science truth”. he does not really know how viruses work, he just administers/manages those that do.
It’s the herd stupidity of the know it alls in DC that keeps Fauci in the spotlight. Mark Levin made a great observation of Fauci’s career in that he’s a political creature his whole life and to stay that long, he had the singular ability to crush any younger person who might wish to compete for his job. Did Fauci develop the vaccines? No, he just talks about them.
The positive of the WuFlu and Trump legacy will be people realizing what kind of low down, lying scum are in charge of media and politics to name 2 institutions out of many. The negative is I doubt people will do anything about it. Then again I’m getting more cynical in my older years, but I fear for my younger relatives.
It’s far past time for fauci to go. He is a fine example of the incompetence and corruption in our government. He is another example of the “peter principal” where fools can rise in an organization until they exceed their capability.
Well said!
A lot of us peasants out here will require a large number of people being fired, and quite a few being jailed, before anything like trust of government will come again.
Statistical risk is beyond what most people can understand, much less apply. And they apply different ‘acceptable risk’ standards to their own decision than they do to those made by others. Herd immunity is a statistical consideration with multiple factors affecting it. Reducing it to a single number is simplistic.
Wherever you draw a line, you extend an invitation to a border skirmish. This is why ‘everybody’ or ‘nobody’ are such easy positions to take. Who can argue against perfection “as the ideal goal”?
Regardless of the impracticality of such a position, it sets up the metric that you measure success by how little you fail (resulting in guilt or shame). How fun is that?
[…] like someone is trying to change his tune… again. Good Lord, when are we going to stop listening to this guy??? Oh, and beware of media outlets […]
[…] Sunday, the “Noble Lie” Doctor decided to sound a warning about Christmas […]
[…] function” research. I know, I know, you’re shocked, SHOCKED, that the Good Doctor of the Noble Lie intentionally deceived Congress about exactly what the National Institutes of Health was funding in […]
[…] a lab coat. He flip-flopped on mask wearing, being against it before he was for it. He admitted to lying to the public in pursuit of “the greater good” on herd immunity and vaccinations. Fauci then pushed […]
12 Comments