As the deadlocked jurors of the Lindsay Clancy trial are sprung from civic duty, several of the women on the jury opened up about what happened behind closed doors.

To recap, no verdict was reached in the trial because one lone juror refused to find Lindsay Clancy, a woman who strangled her three young children to death (and admitted to this), not guilty by reason of insanity.

But, but but…the Lone Juror admitted that he held doubts after watching a video,” said one juror.

I started filling out forms, I was so excited. There were three forms I had to fill out and I started filling them out, I wrote my signature on each one but then he said, ‘But I’m still not going to say she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.’”

So excited? Excited about what, exactly? That you were ready to sign off and give reprieve to a woman who had a hand (or two) in killing her kids? Is this what excites people these days?

100% chance she has a one of those yard signs… pic.twitter.com/ibfn84HObA

— 'The Mysterious' Jon Burrows (@realjonburrows) September 8, 2026

And, murder is murder.

He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said.”

…Said another juror. You know what else is a very arrogant notion? Playing God and taking the life of another person,or-in the case of Lindsay Clancy, another three people.

The coffee klatch on camera continues with another juror’s musings:

Every one of us in the hours of our frustration would get up and walk the room because you just couldn’t sit anymore. And we would all go to the cart with the exhibits. He, I think, got up to the cart once very briefly and went back to his seat.”

He would not interact with us and try to understand. We read to him, on numerous occasions, the definition of reasonable doubt from Judge [William] Sullivan’s instruction.

But he had the hardest time getting over the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”

They seemed to “get over the FACT” (she said it, not me) that Clancy viciously killed her children. Maybe, just maybe, THAT was his understanding. They were so excited to sign the papers and then, the arrogant, manly-man-misogynist, who only glanced at the exhibits once, did not cave to the pressure of the Karens who were pushing for a not-guilty verdict. How dare he!

These females are why Massachusetts has a female governor getting giddy about legalizing child sacrifice.

— The Last Millennial (@ElderMi11ennial) September 9, 2026

The jurors said the prosecution did not show enough compassion for Clancy. They were haaaaash (harsh), very haaaahhhsh in their treatment of this poor woman…

…who, I will mention again, strangled her three young children. The prosecution did not show enough compassion? Pray tell, what in the way of compassion was extended to those sweet kids?

The jury foreperson, the one who was so excited to sign the papers but robbed of all jubilance by a MAN, is-get this-a retired fifth grade special needs teacher.

Let me guess. She took lots of professional development sessions and participated in many a book study on anti-bullying but she was COMPLETELY FINE with signing off on papers that proclaimed a woman who choked the life out of her kids was innocent. Thank your lucky stars this woman was not the teacher of your special needs child. Jesus.

And, if the above is not bad enough, Clancy’s defense lawyer made an appeal on Good Morning America for Trump to pardon his client:

Mr. President, I would hope that you would consider this young lady – the type of person she is and what she’s been through – and consider a pardon.”-Kevin Reddington

The jurors found Mr. Reddington to be, quote, “funny” and “entertaining”. I’m sorry? Did they not realize they were not at a comedy show and were sitting on a murder trial of someone who strangled three young children? A few years back, I sat on a jury. It was a pretty heavy case (not murder, but a series of rapes that happened over 20 years ago) and no one, I repeat, no one, was “excited” about delivering a verdict. The deliberation room was tense, quiet. Somber, even. There was no confetti or party streamers. Now, back to the excited forewoman for a spell. Was she excited because she finally got to go home to her cats? Or was she excited because she had an agenda, that she would be deemed the hero to all those donned in pink outside of the courthouse? Was the man juror’s serious stance and holdout perceived by these women as “arrogance”?

If wanting justice for innocent children is labeled as arrogance, boy, has our culture gone down the toilet.

It is not at all that I have no sympathy for a woman who is having a hard time physically, emotionally or psychologically. There is a lot on the spectrum of women’s health that has largely been discounted. If only the medical community prioritized health initiatives for postpartum, perimenopausal and menopausal women instead of providing surgeries, mental health counseling and hormone injections for men who want to be women and for children whose parents tell them they want to be the opposite gender. Maybe, just maybe, Lindsay Clancy would have gotten some help. Maybe those children would still be alive today.

Shout out to my mom for not strangling me when times got tough.

— Kinger85 (@USARed76) September 8, 2026

To all you moms out there, keep on trucking. There will be times you feel like you are losing your mind because-hormones. But, in your hearts, you know that you would do anything to protect those humans that gave you the honored title of “Mom”. Love them. Hug them often. Hold them close.

To the Lone Juror, wherever and whoever you are, cheers. May you never have to buy a drink ever again.

Featured image via succo on Pixabay, cropped, Pixabay license