The Lindsay Clancy case continues to get more bizarre thanks to her jackass of an attorney, Kevin Reddington. In today’s court hearing, he now claims Lindsay didn’t murder her children. Why? Because lack of evidence.
Defense lawyer Kevin Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan to find the 36-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts, mom not guilty on three counts of first-degree murder after a grueling six-week trial that ended with a hung jury earlier this month.
“Where is the evidence that she did this?” Reddington asked the court Tuesday morning.
The 75-year-old veteran attorney claimed the DNA and fingerprint evidence were “woefully deficient,” the prosecution’s timeline was “ridiculous,” and the police investigation was inadequate.
“In this case, there was no investigation. They just immediately assumed that this woman was guilty,” Reddington said.
The impassioned lawyer also claimed there’s “no evidence” Clancy admitted to the killings — instead, she was told by others what they believed happened when she awoke from sedation at the hospital.
“This entire case is based on speculation,” he argued.
“She was told what happened. She had no memory of what happened,” the lawyer added. “There’s no evidence that she admitted that she did this.”
My jaw literally smacked onto the floor when I read that. That is seriously one helluva U-turn! Reddington spent the entire trial putting it on the record that Lindsay DID admit to killing her children, while blaming the medical profession for the tragedy. Now, suddenly he’s done an about face and is claiming there’s no evidence?? WOW. Just. WOW.
Oh, but there’s more. He got in some digs about the lone juror as well.
Reddington stopped walking briefly, pausing to tell the media he’s not to blame for any backlash the lone wolf juror, Michael P. Desronvil, faces after the panelists forced a mistrial in the killer mom case.
“It’s not my fault that the jury deals with this guy, from Houston, who is not a serious person, who ends up making statements repeatedly, continuously, just fanning the flames, to hear himself talk, and keeps talking about the jury as he’s looking at $400,000, apparently, from his GoFundMe, going on ‘Hannity’ making statements — please.”
Reddington was careful not to refer to Desrevil by name after prosecutors filed a motion Monday asking for a gag order on the defense attorney.
“I am not attacking anyone,” the attorney told reporters.
“And I’m really tired of it.”
HE’S tired of it? He’s the one who has spent days lambasting Desronvil for not bowing to the angry jury mob. And then had the gall to get pissed off when the judge was attempting, badly, to hold him to account.
Prosecutors move to gag "out of control" Kevin Reddington after "disturbing" Lindsay Clancy tirades
The prosecution is calling him out for ATTACKING lone holdout juror Michael Desronvil
REDDINGTON: "I am TIRED of hearing 'persecution,' 'attacking.' I am doing all these… pic.twitter.com/ic2iLnmslI
— Steve Gruber (@stevegrubershow) September 29, 2026
Love that abrupt move to blame President Trump, who only stated that the whole thing was a very sad situation, instead of stepping back and realizing that he is the one who has been out of line. And yes, he absolutely has been going after Desronvil. He’s been doing so since the very moment the trial ended.
But now he’s claiming there’s no evidence that Lindsay murdered her three children.
Good luck with that. Between Kevin Reddington and the gang of eight AWFLS on the jury, our legal system has been dragged into the gutter.
Michael Desronvil, the lone holdout juror, made a very good point on Hannity.
“I know the whole focus has been on me, but we want to reel everything back and put the focus on the three angels,” Michael Desronvil, who is said to be hiding out at an undisclosed location, said in a video statement airing exclusively on Fox News’ “Hannity” Monday evening. “The ones that can’t speak for themselves, the ones that can’t defend themselves, and the ones that can’t fight the battles — and those are Cora, Dawson and Callan.”
Kevin Reddington doesn’t care about Cora, Dawson, and Callan. It’s VERY clear that most of the jurors did not. Nor does anyone of the very online jury and “medical experts” out there.
Now he’s claiming there was never any evidence that Lindsay murdered her children. He had PLENTY of time to make that argument during the original trial. In fact, his argument during the trial was that she DID kill her children while in postpartum psychosis. He stated that repeatedly.
Evidently Reddington couldn’t make this argument during the trial because of what the judge did and didn’t do. Oh, so it’s the judge’s fault? Well, that’s certainly a …take.
This is insane. Reddington is now using the TikTok defenses. Stuff he never said at trial so he can affect the next jury.
Imagine using every trick you can to get a child murderer free. https://t.co/TEttCwZU6s
— Carmine Sabia (@CarmineSabia) September 29, 2026
Exactly. He’s using this ploy to drag out the process, inflame the very online mob further, and taint a future jury pool.
The chaos is the point with this. Actual reasoned defense for Lindsay is not. Any concern for her murdered children? Non existent.
Welcome Instapundit Readers!
Feature Photo Credit: Lady Justice court gavel via iStock, cropped and modified
Carol Marks says: Good grief!!! I’m in shock. I mean what the hell?!
Lloyd says: Must wonder if this lawyer is a retired politician….He is skilled at speaking out of both sides of his mouth!
Scott says: This POS needs to be disbarred
A reader says: Ah yes, yet again here we are, a writer for this blog writing about this trial again, a trial she clearly never watched and has not researched.
I’m feeling like a broken record, but here we go AGAIN:
1. This is not a 180. Clancy pled not guilty back when the charges were first put forward back in 2023, both in February during her arraignment from her hospital room and in October after she was indicted. The link one of those hearings is in my comment on another post.
2. During the pre-trial motions, Reddington tried to have the trial bifurcated— separated— so that first there would be a trial to determine her guilt and then there would be a trial to determine her criminal responsibility, aka whether she was sane. The judge refused. Here is article from the Cape Cod Times with that info: https://www.capecodtimes.com/story/news/crime/2026/04/02/duxbury-ma-lindsay-clancy-story-attorney-kevin-reddington/89438821007/
3. Because the bifurcated trial request was denied, Reddington basically was left with two strategies: argue straight not guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. He chose the latter. This was not an admission of guilt, but rather what he saw as his best path forward to getting the best result for his client. This is a former prosecutor explaining this here. It’s long, but well worth a listen before you opine further: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dd4y7B7B3Qy/?stkn=enp3dmFmcGp6MWtq
4. He actually argued many of the points he made at the hearing on the 29th in his closing arguments. Here is the video: https://youtu.be/2Z2rWzDxV_0?is=mTO65_Mozc5_JsjI
5. His statements yesterday were part of his attempt to get the judge to rule in his favor on his Rule 25 motion. Here’s the Rule 25 motion text: https://www.mass.gov/rules-of-criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-rule-25-motion-required-for-finding-of-not-guilty
He is specifically going hard on the idea of insufficient evidence.
His job is to defend his client and give her the best result that he can. As the former prosecutor I mentioned above stated, in the Rule 25 motion, he was pointing out issues with the case that would point to the judge ruling her not guilty due to lack of criminal responsibility. By bringing up Rule 25, he wasn’t flip flopping or doing something illegal that would cause him to be disbarred, he was merely pointing out the lack of evidence that he perceived during the trial which supported the assertion that a juror could not find her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt with the evidence presented. That’s it. And whether you like it or not, the fact that 11 jurors were going to say she was not guilty by lack of criminal responsibility, he does have a point.
Furthermore, lumping all the jurors together as if they all agree with the three most vocal is incredibly disingenuous and false. Because you just don’t know that. As I keep saying, two of the jurors who have spoken out clearly have no ties to the other three. And one is a military veteran whom you are disrespecting and potentially defaming. Stop it.
John C. says: I hate to say it, but he is the type of lawyer I would want to have if I was dragged into court for a major crime, guilty or innocent. He almost got her off in the first trial, despite all the evidence against her. I am minded of O.J. Simpson’s legal team, who were paid to do a job of work for him, and delivered.
I intensely dislike Clancy being referred to as a “mom.” I know it’s a shorthand, but a woman who could cold-bloodedly kill her own children is no “mom.”
alanstorm says: It’s unfortunately not rare to see this kind of warped “thought” on the Net. I’ll take just a couple of items out of a target-rich environment”:
“Clancy pled not guilty…” What’s your point? Has no other guilty person plead “Not Guilty” before?
“Reddington basically was left with two strategies: argue straight not guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. He chose the latter.” Um, that IS an admission that she did it, while claiming she had an excuse. Claiming she DIDN’T do it now is indeed a 180.
Scott says: Agreed on all points.. as for.my comment on the lawyer needing to be disbarred, although ” a reader” tried to twist why I suggested that, it had nothing to do with him trying to get the verdict changed, or any of the other legal wrangling, it was entirely based on his criminal actions in attacking the holdout juror.
[…] SOMEONE GET THIS MAN SOME THORAZINE: Attorney Claims There Is Zero Evidence Lindsay Clancy Murdered Her Children. […]
Amanda Marcotte Has Entered the MAGA Family Group Chat
https://victorygirlsblog.com/amanda-marcotte-maga-family-group-chat/
Well, congratulations to Amanda Marcotte. She’s finally cracked the case of why grown children stop speaking to their conservative parents. It’s MAGA, of course. What else could...
Continue readi
Media Provides Cover For DACA Illegal Who Sledgehammered Iwo Jima Monument At Quantico
https://victorygirlsblog.com/media-provides-cover-for-daca-illegal-who-sledgehammered-iwo-jima-monument-at-quantico/
An illegal, here originally under the auspices of Obama’s asinine DACA program, decided to take a sledgehammer to the Iwo Jima monument at Quantico. One of the...…
8 Comments