Previous post
Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot finally had it up to her eyeballs with people who violate the city’s stay-at-home orders. So she threatened culprits with jail.
But these aren’t the protestors from Friday’s rally, or families enjoying Chicago parks whom she’s addressing. So while you might get your dander up about authorities curtailing peoples’ freedoms, consider that these scofflaws take violations to a whole new level.
These are young adults who keep having huge house parties, in a city where as of this writing there are almost 39,000 cases of COVID-19. Almost 1700 people have died. What’s more, while 30% of Chicago residents are black, they die at six times the rate of white residents.
And where do these house parties mainly occur? In the black community.
On Friday night, Chicago police broke up several parties. On Saturday, they learned of six more planned. So on Saturday night, the Chicago mayor went to the site where a party was supposed to be held, and lectured. Boy, did she lay down the law, as my mother used to say:
“We all need to be thinking about the long game, and having these parties when we need people to continue to stay at home is just silly. What’s it going to mean? It’s going to mean we are never getting out of this.”
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot. Credit: wikimedia commons/CC BY 2.0.
The mayor lowered the boom and threatened jail time:
“Don’t make us treat you like a criminal, but if you act like a criminal and you violate the law and you refuse to do what is necessary to save lives in this city in the middle of a pandemic, we will take you to jail, period.”
Now did any of the youths pay attention to her? Well, they listened, and then blew her off. One called after her as she walked away, and literally told her to go home:
“Ya’ll overdoing it. Ya’ll need to find a cure, talking about go home. You go home.”
Last week the entertainment site TMZ posted a video of one of the house parties. While the videos that regular news outlets showed of that same party were pretty tame, TMZ posted a much more shocking video. In fact, a stripper was there, and boy did those party-goers make it rain.
There was lots of social activity, I’d say, and very little distancing, amirite?
But the organizer of that party, Janeal Wright, later apologized and told reporters why he threw the party. It was to honor two of his friends who were shot to death in 2018.
So he “honored” his friends with a stripper. Okay then.
The Chicago Tribune penned an editorial about the event — without mentioning the stripper, of course — asking the reader for understanding of why black kids are throwing these parties. In their tough neighborhoods they don’t think they’ll live to 25, anyway, says the Tribune. “So let the house party fiasco become a moment to reflect, not condemn,” it concluded.
With a soft soap attitude like that, do you really think these young black adults will heed health warnings? Heck, they scoff at the Chicago mayor, and she’s black, too.
Now I don’t like the idea of tossing people in jail for visiting other people. That’s a huge infringement of rights, and while my husband and I have mostly stayed home, we won’t rat on our younger neighbors hosting a small party outside, or young men playing soccer in a park. I won’t be that Karen. And in a way, I see why young adults might not pay attention to what “experts” tell them about the virus, especially when we’ve all received information that’s all over the place. Where I live, people are angry and tired of that nonsense. They’re worried about their livelihoods, and ready to go back to work.
But these kids are not flouting the law to go to work. They’re more focused on their right to party. And house parties in a city like Chicago are Petri dishes for the virus. Consider that the coronavirus spreads more readily indoors. Consider, too, that over a quarter of black Americans live in multigenerational homes, which means that it’s very likely these partygoers might be bringing the virus home to their grandmas and grandpas. And Grandma and Grandpa might become more statistics in the Grim Reaper’s tally of COVID victims.
It’s no wonder Lori Lightfoot has finally come to the end of her rope regarding these parties. She’s not acting like MI Gov. Gretchen Whitmer or CA Gov. Gavin Newsom, whom I would swear look for excuses to destroy whatever joy people find during this incredibly frustrating time. But the Chicago mayor is trying her best to keep the death toll down in her city, and if it means sending some of these kids to jail, she’ll do it.
However, the politically powerful in Illinois also have some ‘splainin’ to do, and that includes Lightfoot herself. Last month she received a haircut, even though salons are closed, and got a lot of heat from shaggy Chicagoans. Then there’s IL Gov. J.B. Pritzker, whose wife recently went to Florida to spend time at the family’s $12 million estate.
Lockdown for thee, but not for me, right? Neither of those actions are examples for young black Chicagoans who, like the rest of us, want to enjoy life again.
But back to the house parties.
There’s something disturbing about locking up people for attending a loud, crowded party. It goes against the grain of our American sense of freedom. But I wish I knew how anyone can convince these kids that their behavior just might bring the virus home to grandparents, or aunties or uncles, whom they love.
Welcome, Instapundit readers!
Featured image: JobsForFelonsHub.com/flickr/cropped/CC BY 2.0.
young adults
Who have like a 0.2% chance of death (and only a 5% chance of hospitalization) if you include up through age 39 as “young adult” (Va statistics, if I’m reading them right). Even if they go home to elderly family members, they’re not thinking that far ahead. (Also, while they may be partying like animals, they might be taking precautions around those elders. I’ve seen that sort of behavioral compartmentalization.)
if you act like a criminal and you violate the law
Ummmm, was it passed as a law? I don’t think it was. Is she acting under authority of a law? Maybe.
This is part of the problem with all these shutdowns – the ones that are laws haven’t been tested (hopefully they will be soon!) and the rest are just general powers of “the general welfare” naturally vested in the executive branch.
(Deletes rant about stupid laws making people more likely to flout the law, and that likely being the case already in Chicago.)
So he “honored” his friends with a stripper. Okay then.
This is NOT a “youth” issue. This is NOT an issue of people violating the shutdown. This is a CULTURE issue. This is the culture in a lot of our urban areas, reinforced by various media (and certain politicians). It goes way beyond our current crisis.
they don’t think they’ll live to 25, anyway
Well, that’s been the excuse for the thug culture for at least 3 decades now, probably closer to 5.
that nonsense
Yes, nonsense it was from the beginning.
But these kids are not flouting the law to go to work.
Wow, now you sound just like Karen, deciding what’s “essential” and such. Keep this in mind next time you argue with an anti-gunner about you not “needing” a certain firearm.
if it means sending some of these kids to jail
Said every totalitarian, ever. (Remember, too, that if they are part of the culture that does this, going to jail is a reward to them. It increases their street cred.)
Now, having thrown out those criticisms, you end with exactly the right attitude:
I wish I knew how anyone can convince these kids
And that goes back to the “soft soap” from the Chicago Tribune. There’s a cultural indifference to death and a whole lot of other things going on that hamper the “black community”* right now. The left thinks the answer to it is to clamp down hard with rules and laws and blanket prohibitions**. We’ve just seen how that does not work.
We (that is, freedom lovers) have to 1) fight win the culture war, 2) get the crime-fighting focused on actually locking the bad people away, and 3) take away the crutches that reinforce the nihilism (like generational welfare).
(* That’s in quotes because it is the phrase du jour. It’s a way to make it a racial thing instead of a culture thing. Because I know lots of people who are black who are not part of that.)
(** Like gun bans. Or total lockdowns house arrest.)
As sympathetic as I am about many of these protests, I’d be far more sympathetic if the people at them were wearing masks. Not wearing masks just lets everyone dismiss them as idiots. Lightfoot is right here: “What’s it going to mean? It’s going to mean we are never getting out of this.” If people are desperate for this to end, then stop going out without a mask on. People need to show that they can take the responsibility to protect their neighbors without the heavy hand of the government locking everyone down in perpetuity.
“People need to show that they can take the responsibility to protect their neighbors without the heavy hand of the government”
Because people do NOT have rights. They have *conditional* PERMISSIONS granted by the State. And if they refuse to submit to the State’s DEMANDS, then they DESERVE to have those permissions REVOKED by the “heavy hand of government”.
:eyeroll:
We all need to be thinking about the long game, and having these parties when we need people to continue to stay at home is just silly. What’s it going to mean? It’s going to mean we are never getting out of this.”.. That’s actually inaccurate, eventually the stupid ones will die off, or become immune..
Agree 100% with GWB, this is a culture issue, one that only those in the culture can fix. While it would be sad if these fools bring it home to grandma and grandpa (and their parents if they’re not in jail), those “adults” are the ones that allow this “culture” to flourish. If they’d done their jobs as parents, there wouldn’t be such a widespread issue with feral teenagers / young people.
Sadly, they ” community” is reaping what it’s sown, and proving Darwin right. And when you add in the “rules for thee, but not for me” as you point out, it only exacerbates the situation.
The comparison to gun rights and the “you don’t need ” that type of firearm is exactly the same thing. it’s a slippery slope when you allow govt to infringe on rights and decide what you “need” or what’s “essential”
Let’s not overreact here. As of the 2018 census, the Windy City had a population of 2,705,994. A covid-19 death count of 1700 is a percentage of 0.06282. Yes, they were stupid, and did a stupid thing, but it’s Chicago. I’d say they are more likely to die in a drive-by than from covid-19.
But what does the mayor do in the short term?
Well, for starters, follow her own damn guidelines. If she’s cheating on hair styling, it’s probable she’s cheating on a lot more. When you start with a population that’s contemptuous of authority to start with and act like a hypocrite, to expect them to follow any of your guidelines is well, not wise.
Unfortunately, due to her own arrogance, she’s lost moral authority on this issue. So, failing moral authority, she’s fallen back on her last alternative: brute force. And, naturally, since she’s failed on moral authority, she’s throwing the police into the line of fire. And it will likely end badly for at least one police officer.
So, really, the question is: Would I put police in the line of fire due to my own failings to follow my own regulations? No, I wouldn’t.
Numbers-these kids aren’t dumb.
They observe the news reports; they ARE training in Colleges and Universities across the Globe.
They did the breakdowns. They analyzed those numbers.
They know EXACTLY what this is.
All their reading and movies placed this dystopian nightmare scenario front-and-center in their thoughts, their minds rendering of the future planet living conditions.
Star Wars-least EVERYONE forgets, isn’t exactly a ‘stellar'(I had to) report on “PAST RESULTS DO NOT REFLECT FUTURE SLAVERY DUTIES” Thank you, THE MANAGEMENT
Wasn’t the FORCE just Free Will?
It’s here.
THEY will Shut You Up.
“This is the way it’s gonna be from now on”.
Said Billy Sunday….
20 Comments