Next post
The caterwauling over the potential picks for Supreme Court reached ear-splitting levels in about .023 seconds. Not only do we have the ZOMG! Roe v Wade is in danger!, we also have the But Merrick Garland angst from Chucky Schumer. OOF. However, when Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski are told it’s time to leave the GOP…because women will NO LONGER be able to reproduce freely! SOB!!
I share the despair, but have we forgotten something? Republicans have a one-vote majority in the Senate. Their number includes two female moderates, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, both of whom support abortion rights, and one of whom — Ms. Collins — has already declared this week that she would not support a candidate hostile to Roe v. Wade.
Well, first of all, both Lisa and Susan have been Democrats masquerading as RINOS for a very long time. So long in fact that, when this writer was putting together a conference in DC many many years ago, Susan was NOT on the list of invitees because she was soft on…well, every issue in fact. But I digress.
This NY Times writer wants Lisa and Susan to defect in order to protect women’s right to kill babies in the womb. Yes BABIES. I refuse to use the clinical term fetus. I am a mother and believe you me, that heartbeat and first kick? That’s a BABY in there folks, not NOT a fetus. Moving on.
Lisa needs to defect for women’s rights to abort babies, and well it would be helpful if she did and would then drop her troublesome stance on wanting to drill for that darned pesky oil in wildlife refuges.
Meanwhile Susan opined an absolutely asinine stance regarding Roe V Wade
Hello Susan!! Please show us ALL exactly WHAT case is pending through the courts that would A. make it past the non-judicial activists judges (except for those lately(Justice Willett for one) who’ve been nominated by President Trump and approved by the Senate) and B. is there even a case that would make it to the Supreme Court to consider? And C. Susan, umm Suzi…may I call you Suzi? You should Constitution better after all these years.
There are three very fine jurists under consideration for Supreme Court
But NOOOO!! That doesn’t matter to the leftist socialist media.
Hey @CNN, I just saw your profile of three potential Supreme Court nominees (Kavanaugh, Kethledge, and Barrett). The profiles of Kavanaugh and Kethledge described their professional accomplishments and credentials. The profile of Barrett started by saying she has 7 children.
— Jaime Santos (@Jaime_ASantos) July 6, 2018
I dunno about you, but isn’t that called DISCRIMINATION?
Meanwhile, the NY Times finishes up their angsty ZOMG! We must DO SOMETHING with this bit of drivel.
We are at another watershed moment that could “result in national suicide and the end to everything we Americans hold dear.” As the damage and outrages pile up, it’s important to remember that Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski are enabling them with their affiliation, even when they dissent. They could halt the whole charade, and alter the course of history, with a press release.
Holy smokes. That’s some serious pearl clutching!
It’s Friday and the grand announcement from President Trump will happen late Monday. Meanwhile folks, I’d suggest you stock up on adult beverages of your choice along with significantly YUUUUGE amounts of popcorn and enjoy the weekend spin. It will be quite the show.
I dunno about you, but isn’t that called DISCRIMINATION?
Well, no. It’s kinda sexist, but not really discrimination unless they make it a negative compared to the other candidates.
result in national suicide and the end to everything we Americans hold dear
Well, I agree. Fortunately, Trump isn’t likely to make a horrible, progressive pick that would do that.
1 Comment