Previous post
Next post
In the heartland of America, Indiana University (IU)’s Medical School has now stated there are more than three genders and that men have “cervices”.
This is not a joke. The IU School of Medicine, (IUSOM), Sex and Gender Primer is designed to give students in the medical community “goals”. Some of these “goals” were obtained by Fox Digital. Are we ready for these? Hint: you may need to give yourself an extra shot of caffeine for these. Just saying.
1. Reduce gendered language and instead use person-first and/or anatomy-specific language.
2. If gender or sex is necessary, be cautious of generalizations and/or use an assigned sex/gender phrase.
3. Engage in self-directed learning to apprise yourself of inclusive language practices as they evolve over time.”-IUSOM
The Primer is authored by Assistant Professor, Dr. Jessica Byron and Dr. Valerie O’ Loughlin, a Professor of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology at IU/Bloomington. Gender is just a social construct, they say. A man can be a woman and produce just like a woman can. Legit DOCTORS who have been to MEDICAL SCHOOL are pushing this. Excuse me, but isn’t this like the pilot of a plane telling you the jet runs on fairy dust?
In fact, the male and female “gender types” are just “oversimplifications on a continuum”. So, guys, gals, if you identify as “male” or “female”, you are just an “oversimplification” in a plethora or gender identities, you simpletons. What exactly does this mean in practical terms? That medical students and staff, and the community as a whole has to treat someone based on who they say they are and not what their anatomy dictates?
So, if someone (a human) identifies as a cat, per se, would their medical professional now be a veterinarian? Does this mean some twelve year-old who demands a litter box at middle school needs to get a yearly rabies and distemper sequence? And if so-called twelve-year old with parents who can’t see to help their poor child face the reality that they will NEVER be a cat, and, at that, NEVER a “boy cat”, despite their desire to get “neutered” (because their child is a biological female), where do we go from there? And, what happens when the veterinarian laughs in their faces? Or, if their health insurance company does not support this lunacy? They stick with hard science (snort):
This is the new medical community. Plainly and willingly ignorant. Throw the word “science” out there until someone really wants to talk old-school “science” and then say science has nothing to do with it.
1. Inclusive language affirms and validates trans and nonbinary identities.
2. Affirmation across psychological, medical, and social domains is a significant predictor of positive health outcomes and self-esteem.
3. Inclusive sex education significantly reduces depression and suicidality in lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents.”-IUSOM
How is mutilating one’s body a “positive health outcome”? And, is the medical community now pushing all other health concerns of an individual under the carpet of being in favor of supporting a person’s mental illness and delusion? Are we at the juncture where equity and inclusion trumps competency and knowledge? Future doctors and physicians will be now too busy doing prostrate exams on biological females who say they are “men” and Pap Smears on men who insist they are “women”. Don’t tell a mentally confused human being that their symptoms have nothing to do with PMS because the person is a GUY. You may hurt his freaking feelings.
The truth is, there are two body types=male and female. A trained physician should only have to be concerned with one when you are sitting in the examination room. Acknowledging more than the two leads to how many different diagnoses? How many different treatments? How many sick people in our nation?
People with cervices need to undergo yearly cervical screening.”-IUSOM
People with cervices. People who menstruate.
How can you, as future healthcare professionals, be inclusive of sexual and gender-diverse patients?”-IUSOM
This is taking the place of The Hyppocratic Oath:
With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage. Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so.”-The Hippocratic Oath
Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone, neither will I counsel any man to do so…
Unless a man is in big Pharma and there is money to be made in gender-affirming hormone therapy for children. Unless the directives come from your professors and you are required to take this DEI course and repeat the script for your grade. Medical students, run like hell. Or, at the very least, demand part of your tuition refunded.
Photo Credit: , via Wikimedia Commons” rel=”noopener” target=”_blank”>CC BY 4.0 /Cropped
Reality is not going to be kind to those people.
If these are our future medical professionals we too might be the unfortunate recipients of that cold hard reality.
There are actually four genders: masculine, feminine, common, and neuter. No matter one’s chosen/compelled pronouns, gender always falls into one of these four categories. Incidentally, an individual eunuch still falls under the masculine gender; he has been neutered but he is not neuter.
There are two sexes. Even in the extremely rare cases of hermaphroditism and similar conditions, it is not a third sex but an occurrence of both. True asexuality, at least as a theoretical concept (I’m unaware of any actual examples), is also not a third sex – it is the absence of sex.
*I’m unaware of any actual human examples
Perhaps you should read ‘Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation’?
It’s not for the faint of heart and never show it to a woman who is pregnant.
Perhaps I will, but I doubt I’ll be able to in time to be relevant for this comment thread.
What part of my above comment would it address? You’re not suggesting there’s actual evidence of real, human asexuality, are you?
I mean literal asexuality – the ability to reproduce without sex, not the figurative identity of people who insist they don’t experience sexual attraction.
You know that the mob would come after you for speaking heresy, right? -:-)
The mob can eat a bag of dicks. It is not the arbiter of the English language and it has absolutely no influence on reality.
Your views intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your fine publication.
Well stated
10 Comments