HCQ and Lysenkoism 2.0

HCQ and Lysenkoism 2.0

HCQ and Lysenkoism 2.0

The hysteria decrying HCQ (hydroxychloroquine) as snake oil!!! or killer drug!!! is still the dominate narrative of the Left and its PR machine aka mainstream media. The latest is the shrieking over Dr. Harvey Risch, professor of epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health. In an eye-opening interview, he lays out the case for HCQ and points out that Dr. Fauci’s feet of clay goes back to 1987 with AIDS patients.

Here’s the interview. Please watch the whole thing.

Let’s note a couple of very important things. Near the beginning, Mark Levin quotes from Steven Hatfill, virologist, writing in Real Clear Politics.

There are now 53 studies that show positive results of hydroxychloroquine in COVID infections. There are 14 global studies that show neutral or negative results — and 10 of them were of patients in very late stages of COVID-19, where no antiviral drug can be expected to have much effect. Of the remaining four studies, two come from the same University of Minnesota author. The other two are from the faulty Brazil paper, which should be retracted, and the fake Lancet paper, which was.

In other words, the science is showing overwhelming evidence that HCQ is an effective antiviral when given early. 53 to 1. (Note: I covered the fraudulent Lancet paper just two months ago.)

Not just that, but Hatfill further offers evidence that countries with aggressive, out-patient use of HCQ have much lower death rates than the UK or US.

Death rates in countries HCQ
Screenshot of HCQ chart by Steven Hatfill

And if you don’t accept Hatfill’s chart, go ahead and check the stats on Worldometer. Deaths per million for USA = 553. Deaths per million for India = 44.

What is going on here? Why are Leftwing sites licking Fauci’s ankles while attacking Dr. Risch and falsely stating

Berman went 11 rounds with Dr. Risch on Monday over the drug that President Donald Trump has been promoting for months, but which has not been proven effective and may be harmful in some cases.

Fifty-three studies to one, assholes. Fifty-three studies to one.

And if you truly watched the video, let me point out at the 12:50 mark where Dr. Risch drops a bombshell. We’ve been here before with St. Fauci. Specifically in 1987 when he dismissed allowing the use of the a generic antibiotic, bactrim, in AIDS patients in NY City who were dying of pneumocystis pneumonia. Bactrim was showing great promise in preventing death in these patients.

… [AIDS] activists obtained a meeting with Dr. Fauci and 15 of his selected scientists at FDA, at NIH, and asked Dr. Fauci just to make guidelines to physicians that they could consider using bactrim to treat, preemptively, AIDS people so they wouldn’t die of this pneumonia. Dr. Fauci refused. He said ‘I want randomized, controlled – blinded controlled trial evidence. That’s my gold standard. That or nothing.’

The activists left. The NIH did not fund any randomized trials. They raised money themselves from their own AIDS patients to collect the data to do a randomized trial. It took them two years. They came back to Dr. Fauci — during those two years the FDA approved AZT as a treatment for AIDS. AZT works but not completely. It needs other medications as well. And during the two years it took them to get this data to come back to Dr. Fauci to support using bactrim 17,000 people with AIDS died because of Dr. Fauci’s insistence on NOT allowing even a statement supporting consideration of the use.

Dr. Fauci would rather people die than allow them to try. Any wonder why this established FDA hubris lead to President Trump’s signing of the Right to Try legislation?

What you witness from the Left isn’t science but a revival of Soviet Lysenkosim. Because of Trofim Denisovich Lysenko’s assertion that that all science is class-oriented in nature he became a favored pet of Joseph Stalin and Lysenko’s pseudo-science became the politically approved “science” allowed. And when the Soviet’s engaged in cancel culture they didn’t kid around.

From 1934 to 1940, under Lysenko’s admonitions and with Stalin’s approval, many geneticists were executed (including Isaak Agol, Solomon Levit, Grigorii Levitskii, Georgii Karpechenko and Georgii Nadson) or sent to labor camps. The famous Soviet geneticist and president of the Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, was arrested in 1940 and died in prison in 1943.

As Dennis Prager is wont to say, “Truth is not a Leftwing value.” So tell me, how many lives have been lost to St. Fauci’s belief in his own sycophantic press and his Lysenkoist-lite attitude towards HCQ?

featured image original art by Darleen Click for Victory Girls

Written by

  • bob sykes says:

    Fauci also participated in the coverup of Robert Gallo’s plagiarism of Luc Montagnier’s research. When the Noble prizes were awarded for HIV research, Gallo was snubbed. Fauci still defends him.

  • […] Celebrates The Only Woman To Win The Medal Of Honor, also, Anti-Gun Projection Again Victory Girls: HCQ & Lysenkoism 2.0 Volokh Conspiracy: Kamala Harris On The Second Amendment, also, The ACLU Defends The NRA Weasel […]

  • GWB says:

    quotes from Steven Hatfill
    Whoa, isn’t he a terrorist or something? /sarc

    Why are Leftwing sites licking Fauci’s ankles while attacking Dr. Risch
    TWO big reasons:
    – Big Pharma
    – Orange Man Bad
    They hope to get a new drug out of this and patent it, gaining lots of bucks for whichever company gets there first. And, anything that Trump promotes must be opposed. (Remember when they tried to turn it into “Trump is gonna make oodles of money off HCQ!”? That was projection.)

    ‘I want randomized, controlled – blinded controlled trial evidence. That’s my gold standard. That or nothing.’
    That’s called “making the perfect the enemy of the good.” And it’s wonderful if you’re a Safetyist who wants absolutely ZERO RISK in everything. It sucks if you live in reality.
    (Note, BTW, that there can be risk of side effects. But that’s only after you’ve done the double-blind, randomized, controlled tests.The risk is OK, if it’s been properly vetted by the ‘experts’ and gets printed in real small font on the tv screen during the ad.)

    I advocated for early herd immunity and treatment WAY back in the beginning. I said “Hey, what is a vaccine, but a controlled infection? So, let’s have Wuhan Flu parties, hand out HCQ/zinc/Z-Pak bundles, and get everyone infected. Then, when you first show symptoms, start the HCQ regimen.” All the ‘experts’ freaked about that. I wonder how many people it might have saved? Even in NY nursing homes?

  • Politically Ambidextrous says:

    I just sit here wondering who is accountable for the “surplus deaths” of the people who got the placebo in the gold standard randomized double-blind study. And how they make sure the random selection doesn’t end up being racist in statistical hindsight because there were too many or too few of the oppressed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner