I consider my son to have had a most magical childhood peppered, as it was, with the big Harry Potter books and movies. I enjoyed every moment of it. Reading the books, going to events at bookstores and seeing the movies. We bought two copies of each book so we didn’t have to share. We are ever grateful to J.K. Rowling for conjuring up such a complete world. Miss Rowling is now in a fearsome battle with the dark forces of the “cry-bully” Transgender Army.

On April 16, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled:

The court’s five judges agreed in the landmark ruling that “the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’” under the country’s 2010 Equality Act “refer to a biological woman and biological sex,” Justice Patrick Hodge said.

The ruling “does not remove protection from trans people,” who are “protected from discrimination on the ground of gender reassignment,” the court confirmed — but a transgender person with documentation recognizing them as female should not be considered a woman for equality purposes.”-Patrick Reilly, The New York Post

Transwomen are not biological women. Seems clear to me. They are not Lesbians either. Just to be clear. They are men. They are Gay Men. They are auto gynephiles. They are cross dressers. They are fetishists. That’s a lot of options, right there. Not a woman.

Salon writer Coleman Spilde has written an article dumping a metric ton of merde on the whole Harry Potter world as envisioned by J.K. Rowling, “The success of J.K. Rowling’s transphobic fight depends on the future of “Harry Potter“”. The subtitle is “Rowling’s divisive opinions make it increasingly difficult for fans to separate the art from the artist”. The separation is difficult only because those in the dominate culture have so little practice at it. We, on the non-insane side have been separating wheat from chaff for a long time. The article begins with:

Despite all the power her cultural influence and financial lobbying buy her, it’s comforting to know that J.K. Rowling is powerless to social media. Even $1 billion and the complete and total financial freedom to do whatever she wants with her life isn’t enough to deter Rowling’s chronic posting habit. Like the rest of us, she has probably found herself closing an app, only to have the mortifying reflex to open the very same app one second later. Her high screen time percentage is the great equalizer, making her as much of a cartoon super villain as she is a dangerous and out-of-touch fearmonger.

This entire paragraph sounds more like a sketch of Coleman Spilde and his habits than J.K. Rowling. She has many talents and a well-developed sense of imagination. The next paragraph:

This past week, Rowling gleefully put both these facets of her personality on full display. On Wednesday, the U.K. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the definition of a “woman” in the eyes of U.K. law, according to the 2010 Equality Act, does not include transgender women. The ruling states that sex is binary, and that a “woman” is someone whose biological sex aligns with that definition. The decision was made after a long push from For Women Scotland, an anti-trans group that boasts Rowling as one of its most famous financial backers.

Painful to think, my darlings, but maybe, the Supreme Court has long thought this, but this is the first time they have gotten a chance to say it against the “cry-bullies”. I just got cry bully from the wonderful Ms. Listerssis. You should follow her.

If you’re not sure what a cry bully is- here’s a textbook example. https://t.co/TEyFs1qEdd

— mslisterssis (@mslisterssis) April 22, 2025

That’s a female cosplaying a man. A man cosplaying a female cry bully looks like this interaction that Nancy Mace had.

My security thought this guy was going to throw this plant at me. pic.twitter.com/nEyxXg7zRc

— Nancy Mace (@NancyMace) April 22, 2025

Nicola Coughlan is at least honest enough to own her own idiocy:

My security thought this guy was going to throw this plant at me. pic.twitter.com/nEyxXg7zRc

— Nancy Mace (@NancyMace) April 22, 2025

But, she is not all that bright. We are only interested in her because Julie Andrews performs Lady Whistledown’s words so well. Penelope Featherington was never that interesting. Fact. Like most actors and actresses. Fact.

Back to the Salon dreck:

After the ruling, Rowling sprinted to social media as fast as her thumbs could fiddle. Gloating, she poured herself a drink and lit up a cigar. “I love it when a plan comes together,” she posted on X, alongside a photo of herself taking a drag. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s decision resulted in a throng of protests in London’s Parliament Square, fearing that the ruling could have a cataclysmic ripple effect on trans rights throughout the U.K. and embolden those like Rowling who seek to have those rights vanquished. While an entire subsection of the U.K. population worried about their equal rights being stripped away by antiquated thinking and baseless conspiracy theories, Rowling sat back with a smirk. She may as well have been pictured like Dr. Evil, stroking a white Persian cat, announcing her plot for world domination.

What rights have been “vanquished”? I would worry more about going to jail in the U.K. for a meme than for being a cross dresser. I would worry more about the invasion of people who don’t want to assimilate. Jailing people for memes? Yes, read about it here. J.K. Rowling and Harry Potter is the least of your problems. Bad songs about taking a slash in public are a problem. Like this anti-TERF song.

Fortunately for us, in Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling gave us an anti-dote to out battle against the dementors and the Army of Darkness. A Patronus will protect us against the diabolical smallness and rigidity of the Trans persons. We can summon joy to protect her just like a shield against all the fascist ugly you can bring.

Featured Image: Pixabay,cropped, altered