Previous post
Hillary Clinton is like a pimple on your backside. It never goes away and bothers you most when you have other things to deal with. The Hillary pimple in this case has chosen the leaked war plans contretemps to make her presence known. “Extremely careless” might be a comment on the Jeffrey Goldberg Atlantic article, but it is the comment that then FBI Director James Comey made about Hillary herself.
Everybody, and their Great-Aunt Pearl, is weighing in on the leaked war plans. That includes Hillary Rodham Clinton, a former First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State and Presidential candidate. She posted on X:
You have got to be kidding me.https://t.co/IhhvFvw6DG pic.twitter.com/bnNG4dGSpI
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) March 24, 2025
Clinton has got to be kidding all of us. No conscience, no self-awareness and never any accountability. I would be embarrassed. I would be too ashamed to shame anyone else. Especially when she has no special insight. President Donald Trump revoked Hillary’s security clearance, finally, a few days ago:
President Trump issued a memo late Friday night rescinding security clearances and access to classified information for a slew of erstwhile opponents including Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Joseph R. Biden Jr. and “any other member of Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s family.”
Bwahaha. Finally. How has she had any security clearance these last eight years. Remember Director James Comey and his report? The Comey Report said about her private, home brew server:
Clinton was wrong when she said she never sent or received classified information over the server. “Our investigation found … 110 [emails with then-classified information] that she either received or sent,” he said.
More:
“I think she was extremely careless. I think she was negligent. That I could establish. What we can’t establish is that she acted with the necessary criminal intent,” he insisted. “‘Should have known,’ ‘must have known,’ ‘had to know’ does not get you there. You have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they knew they were engaged in something that was unlawful.”
Hillary Clinton was extremely careless with emails and the lives of those within in charge. Remember Benghazi? Remember “What difference does it make?”:
EVIL Hillary Clinton must be charged for her involvement in the Benghazi disaster. pic.twitter.com/8O8Ypzm2r1
— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) March 18, 2025
The gerbils at the NY Times are chasing their tails about members of the Trump Administration having criticized Hillary:
Top defense officials who mistakenly included a journalist in an encrypted group chat about airstrikes in Yemen engaged in what officials have described as a devastating breach of national security.
But just a few years ago, several members of that group chat criticized Hillary Clinton for using a private email server to conduct official business when she was secretary of state under President Barack Obama.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who disclosed the war plans in the chat this month, condemned Mrs. Clinton’s actions during a Fox News segment in November 2016.
“Any security professional — military, government or otherwise — would be fired on the spot for this type of conduct and criminally prosecuted for being so reckless with this kind of information,” he said.
Hillary deleted 33,000 emails and also got four people killed. There is no comparison. Plus, we have Jeffrey Goldberg’s word that “war plans” were discussed. The Administration Officials on the Signal app were well aware that their conversation possibly could be seen and discussed taking it to the “high side”.
Hillary didn’t weigh in on the Trump Administration’s frustration with Europe. Since she was willing to give away the store that would have been interesting.
Remember when Hillary Clinton was caught with over 31,000 government emails on an illegal private server?
And when she was asked if she deleted the evidence, she joked “what like with a cloth or something?”
No FBI raid on her house & no DOJ indictment
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) June 9, 2023
In addition to her home brew server and the four dead at Benghazi, I also think of constant traveling (grifting), smashed phones, Bleach Bit and the “over-charged” button for Russia.
Since I'm seeing a lot of "Hillary was right" nonsense on here, a reminder Clinton gave the Russian Prime Minister a "Reset button" but her staff was so incompetent that it actually said "overcharge". This happened less than a year after Russia invaded Georgia. pic.twitter.com/6cllkLr4p4
— Easter Fasting from You Heathens (@colorblindk1d) February 23, 2022
Hillary Clinton is a pimple that needs to go away.
Featured Image: Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons.org/cropped/Creative Commons/Takuya Oikawa/Wikimedia Commons.org/cropped/Creative Commons
Scott says: Uh-oh, reader is gonna get his panties in a twist over this. The bitch of benghazi has committed so many criminal and treasonous acts, it’s hard to keep track.. and Comey is either a crook or a liar ( quite possibly both)., because he’s totally wrong in his statement. ” should.have known” is more than ” enough to get there”, no need to prove intent.. though using a private server is clear intent to all but the most partisan of morons ( see also: reader)
Lloyd says: Hillary just can’t accept the fac that she is a LOSER…..no one wants to hear from her, about anything!
SFC D says: There’s no comparison to the Signal chat incident and Hillary’s blatant use of a privately owned server to circumvent federal laws on document retention and archiving. Then we can add in horrendous security violations (one does not just “accidently” email classified material to an unclassified system or send it to an unsecured home printer.). Using Signal as an official chat medium is approved for all retention and archival purposes, and is not a security issue in and of itself. The security issue lies with what is said via Signal and who has access. Apparently, it was an accident that this “journalist” was included, and nothing remotely classified was discussed. Having said that, it’s incredibly stupid to use Signal for official use WITHOUT restricting it to pre-approved contacts.
Que says: Signal not a security issue? Not so fast.
SFC D says: I wouldn’t use it. If it ain’t SIPR or end-to-end encrypted telephone, I wouldn’t consider it secure. The feds believe it’s “secure enough” for governmental traffic. I spent 24 years in Army communications, apparently I set the bar higher than the White House does. I’m not exactly sure who the approving authority would be on Signal. I bet they’re rethinking it.
5 Comments