Just recently Egyptian President Abdel Attah al-Sisi took a remarkable step in speaking out against the violence which is consuming his religion of Islam. On January 1 he called a meeting of Islamic leaders at Islam’s most prominent seminary, Al Azhar, based in Cairo.
Before TV cameras, al-Sisi said:
“Is it possible that 1.6 billion people [Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants — that is seven billion — so that they themselves may live? Impossible!” . . . .
”That thinking — I am not saying ‘religion’ but ‘thinking’ — that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the years, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world. It’s antagonizing the entire world!”
“You need to step outside of yourselves to be able to observe it and reflect on it from a more enlightened perspective. … We are in need of a religious revolution. You, imams, are responsible before Allah. The entire world, I say it again, the entire world is waiting for your next move … because this umma [Muslim community] is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost — and it is being lost by our own hands.”
Boom.
Does Obama side with al-Sisi? Eh, not so much. His falls into his usual modus operandi; i.e., hold a meeting on February 18 to discuss the prevention of “violent extremism” in the United States. He didn’t mention Islam. Again.
Nor will he. This is the president who, in 2012, declared that “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
http://youtu.be/T6uZFSj_ueM
Then there’s Hillary Clinton, AKA, “She Who Would be Queen” (er, President), who just this past December made the boneheaded declaration that America should ’empathize’ with its enemies, calling it “smart power.”
And speaking of ‘prophet of Islam,’ what’s with all these media elites insistent on labeling Mohammed as the “Prophet” Mohammed? He’s not my prophet. One would have to believe that old Mo spoke divinely as a messenger from God, and I don’t believe that. Nor does anyone who is not Muslim believe that.
Would the news media address the God in whom I believe, Jesus Christ, as “our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ?” Would the media toss a bone to Catholic Christians and refer to “our Blessed Mother Mary?” Snort. It would never happen, because Christians don’t annihilate people who don’t believe as they do. When was the last time you heard a clergyman demand that his parishioners “kill the infidel”?
But our elite — from the President down to his media lapdogs — deny that we are truly at war with radical Islam. We may not have declared war, but radical Islam has declared war on us.
In World War II, the nation was awash with posters like this one:
And like this one:
Japs? Fritz? Those are cringeworthy terms, especially 70+ years on. But those images exemplified a powerful nation who realized she was in a war, and that there were enemies who would annihilate her.
Instead we are led by feckless apologists for a religion whose leaders ultimately wish to wipe out the practice and the practitioners of any other religion other than theirs.
Oh, my dear, oh me, oh my.
We wouldn’t want to in any way, even obliquely, imply that we might in any fashion possibly be at war with these rabid, foaming-at-the-sharp-fanged-mouth animals.
Oh, heavens, no!
That might upset their fragile psyches (such as they are) and make them want to hurt us.
Sort of like in Blazing Saddles — Don’t shoot Mongo, you’ll only make him mad.
We’ve replaced John Wayne with Pee Wee Herman when he was still a toddler in diapers (and loaded ones at that).
Now our Prezbo bellows forth, “I am Ozymandias, hear me bore!”
By golly, you are right! I will from this day forward cease using the term “Prophet” proceeding “Mohammed.” Thank you for addressing that!
What day this week will the fatwa of death be pronounced upon Egypt’s president for saying such things? It’s been a while since we’ve heard from the Muslim Brotherhood-no doubt such a fatwa would get the Obama Great Seal of Approval.
“President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.
The unprecedented reversal of Americans’ civil-military relations, and of the president’s duty to protect the First Amendment, was pushed by Earnest as he tried to excuse the administration’s opposition in 2012 to the publication of anti-jihadi cartoons by the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.”
http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/13/white-house-obama-will-fight-media-to-stop-anti-jihad-articles/
5 Comments