Clinton Exposes Nuclear Response Time [VIDEO] #Debate2016

Clinton Exposes Nuclear Response Time [VIDEO] #Debate2016

Clinton Exposes Nuclear Response Time [VIDEO] #Debate2016

Proving her incompetence, yet again, Hillary Clinton talked about Our Nation’s nuclear response time last night. Yes, in the Chris Wallace moderated debate, Hillary Clinton warned us about Donald Trump while exposing her inability to shut her gaping maw.

Hillary Clinton's Gaping Maw
Hillary Clinton’s Gaping Maw

Kyle Becker of the Independent Journal Review covered Hillary’s “loose lips” moment:

It was a WTF (What the Frick) moment at the 3rd Presidential debate: That time Hillary Clinton talked about the amount of time it takes the US to launch a nuclear strike against its enemies:

Let’s go to the videotape:

Yes, once again, Hillary has shown her need to show off and opened her pie hole. Vox has the transcript and here is the quote in context:

Clinton: I find it ironic that he’s raising nuclear weapons. This is a person who has been very cavalier, even casual about the use of nuclear weapons.

Trump: Wrong.

Clinton: Japan, Korea, even Saudi Arabia. He said if we have them, why don’t we use them, which I think is terrifying. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so. And that’s why 10 people who have had that awesome responsibility have come out and in an unprecedented way said they would not trust Donald Trump with the nuclear codes or to have his finger on the nuclear button.

Did Hillary Clinton say “cavalier, even casual”. I think she did. Yeah. Hillary Clinton of the bathroom server guarded by Secret Service Agents. Breitbart reported this from her March, 2015 United Nations presser:

Reading from a briefing book throughout her Q&A, Hillary said at one point, “Well, the system we used was set up for President Clinton’s office. And it had numerous safeguards. It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.”


Hillary Clinton’s emails gave out Chris Stevens itinerary, as reported by Breitbart, which led to the murder of the Ambassador and three others at Benghazi.

The email in question was written Sunday, April 10, 2011 by State employee Timmy Davis and sent to the State email addresses of other employees, including Clinton’s then-foreign policy aide, Jacob Sullivan and Clinton’s senior aide.

Abedin forwarded the message to Clinton. At the time, Stevens was the U.S. envoy to the Libyan rebels.

The dispatch read:

The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the boat, etc). He will monitor the situation to see if it deteriorates further, but no decision has been made on departure. He will wait 2-3 more hours, then revisit the decision on departure.


Courtesy of the Daily Wire
Courtesy of the Daily Wire

These are only two examples. Her “cavalier” attitude about security and Our Nation’s secrets are legion.

Give away our Nuclear Response Time? Just par for the course.

Hillary Clinton has a thirty year record of action and results. Mainly leading to death and destruction. Many because she cannot keep her yap shut. Is it her need to prove that she is the smartest little girl in the room or too many falls on her head? Don’t know. Don’t care.

I remain #NeverHillary

Written by

  • Chris in N.Va says:

    Perhaps the first targets will include those states that do not vote for the Hildabeast on Nov. 8?

    Methinks the implanter of Ozymandias-on-the-Potomac’s “Smart Diplomacy” should have wiped her Reset button with a “correct translation” cloth. Too bad nobody in the State Department speaks Russian. Should have consulted with the Russian embassy.

    Classic Lib politician foot-in-mouth disease.

  • Chris in N.Va says:

    “implanter” => “implementer” ahhhh what difference, at this point, does it make?

  • GWB says:

    Is it her need to prove that she is the smartest little girl in the room….

    This seems to be a theme among our “cognitive elite” (e.g., those who would rule us).

    Honestly, a lot of the information about our nuclear responses/systems/procedures can be found out there, in the wild. It is so important, though, that folks “in the know” not confirm any of it. smh

    • Chris in N.Va says:

      So true. Cannot “confirm” sensitive data even though it’s been seen “in the wild” in its unnatural habitat.

      Still, far too many folks, as you’ve noted, feel compelled to go beyond the childish “I know something you don’t know” to an equally immature need to flout their “insider” insight to show how “connected” they are.

      Same nitwits that drop the hammer (AND anvil) on any poor other lower-level shmuck who accidentally might let something slip.

      It’s good to be above the law….

    • Toni Williams says:

      I know that the 4 minute thing is out there. I am sure our enemies know it. But, you are right GWB, no need to confirm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner