Previous post
Next post
Biden gave a speech today in the Rose Garden, and said something very creepy and outrageous about our children.
BIDEN: "There's no such thing as someone else's child. Our nation's children are all our children!" pic.twitter.com/scaZ4vDrPZ
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 24, 2023
This was at an event in which the 2023 Teacher of the Year was honored. Needless to say, there were plenty of attacks on parents during his commentary. Plus a throwaway insult to the victims and families of the Nashville shooting.
“Teaching should not be a life-threatening profession,” Biden said, referencing deadly school shootings that plague the United States. “And educators should not need to be armed to feel safe in the classroom.”
He spoke at a Rose Garden event that honored the Council of Chief State School Officers’ 2023 teachers of the year from each state. Tulsa, Oklahoma, math teacher Rebecka Peterson was named overall teacher of the year.Biden spoke of the challenges of the modern-day teacher, including gun violence and a growing movement from the right to ban books in classrooms, particularly those that reference gender and sexual identity. Attempted book bans hit an all-time high in 2022.
No, teaching shouldn’t put teachers in danger. However, it isn’t the parents who are endangering the teachers! It’s the POLICIES that are being shoved into place in a lot of schools that are causing problems. As I outlined here, East High School in Denver kicked SRO’s out. Which left school principles and other staff members taking up the slack to pat down dangerous students every day. That school and others are on record for either asking for assistance or for the student to be removed and the district said NO.
Yet, according to Biden, it’s because parents don’t want incredibly graphic books about gender queers, the gay lifestyle, and overt sexuality in the schools, the teachers are at risk. So therefore, there shouldn’t be any more book bans and we need more gun control to save the teachers.
The president used the opportunity to call for teacher raises and more gun control in the face of recent school shootings, while hitting at Republicans ahead of his expected reelection campaign launch later this week.
Among his concerns were book bans, which have been found by the American Library Association (ALA) to have increased by 38 percent between 2021 and 2022.
“Let’s be clear, let’s stand with teachers and parents against politicians [who] try to score political points by banning books,” Biden said. “I never thought, as a student of history, I never thought I’d be a president who was fighting against elected officials trying to ban and banning books.”
The shooter at East High School bought his gun legally. As did the Nashville shooter. As did the Uvalde shooter. Furthermore, wanting books out of schools because of their overtly sexual topic shouldn’t be controversial. Unless you happen to the the American Library Association’s National Director of Intellectual Freedom.
Books like Maia Kobabe’s “Gender Queer,” an intensely polarizing exploration of gender identity, are at the center of the book battles. “It is a graphic novel, so certainly it’s more in-your-face,” said Caldwell-Stone. “But it’s not intended to titillate; it’s intended to provide a window into one person’s experience, not knowing their gender identity and needing to explore that.”
Except the book is so overtly sexual and graphic in nature that it WILL titillate and confuse young kids given it’s been put into elementary school libraries!
Why did @CBSNews not show the porn images from the books we shared with them?
— Moms for Liberty (@Moms4Liberty) April 23, 2023
Looks like they are the ones banning the truth of what is actually being fought about in public schools.
Why not share the graphic images on TV @CBSSunday? #TellUsWhy @RealJanePauley https://t.co/L6HlrQTz43
But that didn’t stop Biden from saying books shouldn’t be banned, ignoring the victims of Nashville and getting very creepy about our children.
Yes, it was very much a reboot of Hillary Clinton’s “It Takes A Village” crap. Only he outright claimed ownership of our children.
"There's no such thing as someone else's child. Our nation's children are all our children!" – Joe Biden
— Nicki Neily (@nickineily) April 24, 2023
Absolutely NOT.
My children are my children. They don't belong to the government or ANYONE else!
Stay in your lane and stop trying to chip away at parental rights, @POTUS. pic.twitter.com/HULtPjQnH6
And that is what Joe and many others are trying to do. Parents rights are paramount. Yet we have school districts, public health, the medical field, and yes our government saying that our children belong to THEM.
No our children do NOT belong to the government. Our children are OUR children. Period. Full. Stop. Parents have a right to know what their children are being taught, or if drag queens are appearing at the schools, or if teachers and staff are working to keep very real issues such as a child thinking they might be transgender from the parents.
"Our nation's children are all out children and that's why your daughter goes by Ralph now and ze/zer/xtey pronouns. Sorry."
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) April 24, 2023
Joe Biden believes all children should belong to the government. Does that include his four year old grandchild, Hunter’s daughter?
Here’s the thing, as creepy as this is, pay attention. Joe is just saying what we already know. Parents rights are under attack and they want our children under their control. We cannot let that happen.
Feature Photo Credit: Original artwork by Victory Girls Darleen Click
370H55V I/me/mine says: “Please run on that one.”
Yes, he will, and he will win. Do not underestimate the extent to which this country has lurched to the left. Even without the fraud, they would still win. We are not voting our way out of this.
Kevin says: No, you idiot, Biden is not saying, “Take everyone’s children and have the government raise them.” That’s about as moronic as your blog post.
What do you do when you see a child who you know who does something wrong/bad/inappropriate/rude (pick your negative descriptive word)? If a child who you knew (and knew their parents) walked by your house and tossed a bag of dog shit on your lawn, what would you do? Nothing. Any member of a community would address the issue either by saying, “Hey, John, come back here and pick up that bag of dog shit and if you do it again I’m going to tell your parents.” OR they would just go directly to the parents. That’s what being a part of a community means; you have a vested interest and want to see it succeed.
If I saw a young person I knew who was graffiti up walls, you better damn well believe I’m going to say something and it’s going to be in a loud voice with a lot of 4 letter words.
Do you want your neighbors and people you know who see your children acting rudely/inappropriately to just write it off as “Oh, those are Nina Bookout’s kids. They’re monsters. But you know she doesn’t want to be a member of the community so we won’t say anything.” I would never touch another parent’s child but I wouldn’t hesitate to let them know what that kid did something stupid.
That’s what that means … not having the fucking government raise your children. Jesus Christ almighty you people have to find something to really get upset over because this is about as idiotic and moronic as it gets.
Nina Bookout says: Kevin,
As a mom and grandmother, you’d better believe that I do and will correct my children and grandchildren when they step out of line.
That said, are you trying to tell me that YOU will correct a random kid on the street for stepping out of line without fear of the consequences?
Here’s the problem with your assertions. This isn’t about children/teens and rude behavior. This is about what Biden and the Democrats BELIEVE and are pushing for. The DOJ labeled parents as terrorists for daring to speak up during school board meetings, and the FBI was told to investigate them. A father was nearly thrown in jail in Virginia for defending his daughter who was sexually assaulted in school because the school officials didn’t like what they were hearing from him. A school board member in Florida thought it was a terrific idea to take the kids to a local gay bar without the parents consent.
Two bills were signed into law in the last couple of weeks in California that will allow minors to proceed with transgender care or abortion WITHOUT involving their parents. Colorado is doing the same. Washington State has now given themselves the authority to “shelter” children without their parents consent so that minor child could either start gender transitioning or have an abortion.
A young girl was sexually trafficked after the school hid her gender confusion from her parents. She was then placed into foster care, attacked, raped, and then ended up two states away …BECAUSE the parents were purposefully kept in the dark.
It is THAT Kevin, and so much more that is the concern here. So when we have a President declare that all children are OUR children, you can damned well bet I did and will let him and the rest know that I as a parent and grandparent vehemently disagree.
Darleen Click says: Correcting someone else’s public behavior doesn’t give you propriety rights to them. And that’s what Creepy Joe or other Leftists want and have achieved in certain states. Child-sniffer Joe has no boundaries when it comes to Other People’s kids (or wives) so he’s just expanding it via policy.
No one buys your gaslighting, dude.
GWB says: No, you idiot
And you start right off being an a**hole. Congrats.
Biden is not saying
Actually, Kevin, he is.
Here’s one of those places where Progressivism took a virtue and twisted it, removing the governor, and putting the pedal to the metal.
The idea of “a village” raising children is actually virtuous – back when it held a certain meaning. The proper meaning is that the entire “village” has a vested interest in seeing a child reared properly, helping the parents to do so. There’s a vested interest in keeping that child within the parents’ boundaries. And within the boundaries of the larger community.
But that communal interest was focused on the parents – reporting the children’s behavior to the parents (after correcting it themselves, if able), dealing with the parents if there was inadequate parenting, etc. Because the parents were those primarily responsible for those children. Yes, they were their children.
The approach of Progressives is different. Despite their claims of not being a religion, they most certainly are, and the State is their god*. And they want the State controlling those children’s lives and upbringing. They want that state creating in them the conditions for their utopia of hedonism and transhumanism. Parents who might have recidivist ideas about morals or the need for algebra must be prevented from interfering with the State’s molding of its children.
(* Yes, their first god is their own “reason”. But the demi-urge to which they bow? That’s the State, as it is the highest form of organization the human mind can construct, and must – in Progressivism – embody the proper will of all the reasonable** people.)
(** Read that as “experts” and it makes more sense after the last few years.)
As to some other aspects of wanting to become father and mother to the children (where have I heard that before…), why then are children pulled away from parental responsibility in terms of eating, care, entertainment, etc.? After all, what are school breakfasts and lunches, but stepping into the role of parent? How about trigger warnings? How about the Progressive idol of “universal child care”? How about universal medical care? All stepping into the role that parents should occupy.
No, Biden isn’t going to (yet!) take your children and put them in public creches to be taught directly to worship the state. But he certainly wants to remove all ability of parents to raise their children in opposition to the Progressive utopia, and the State must – to the greatest extent possible – own them for that to happen.
He absolutely wants to take away your children if you perceive your children to be your own posterity first and foremost, and that they should live in accordance with Nature and Nature’s God.
If only someone had raised you properly, Kevin. /SMH/
GWB says: Also, Kevin, some of us have read the how-to books for Progressivism.
Now, go take your soma and lie down. You’ve earned it today.
GWB says: “Teaching should not be a life-threatening profession,”
No, it shouldn’t. But it’s the policies and doctrines of Progressivism that endanger them.
“And educators should not need to be armed to feel safe in the classroom.”
That’s correct. But in a world where nihilism and hedonism reign supreme, you violence – everywhere. And disarming teachers (or making schools “gun-free” zones) doesn’t do anything to actually solve that violence and its threat to those in schools.
Look, here’s the thing:
Violence was a much lower threat “back in the day” when guns were common at schools: going hunting after school, shooting clubs, hunting safety classes, even show & tell. But there weren’t shootings, in general. Why?
Because in those days Christianity was the overwhelming societal construct, even if not everyone was a believer. There were three things that made a difference: morals, accountability and responsibility, and esteem founded in competence and being a created being instead of mere existence – which actually has no basis in anything but randomness, according to Progressivism.
If you spend all day telling children they are nothing but a random collection of atoms, and that they are extra special simply because they are, they end up feeling that disconnect deep down in their bones. And they know one or the other can’t be true. And this leaves them empty – looking to fill that hole up with social meaning or a crusade or by tearing down others. So they become “trans” or homosexual or gamer gods or simply part of the Woke Inquisition.
Yes, it’s true some children have always done this. But Progressivism – particularly through our schools – has made this the starting point for all children, instead of the outliers. And it is now the default of our entire society.
GWB says: It’s the POLICIES that are being shoved into place in a lot of schools that are causing problems.
No, it’s the doctrine they are being taught. Hiding behind the lie that Progressivism is not a religion.
Which left school principles and other staff
“Principals”. Their principles were entirely intact, awful as they might be.
according to Biden, it’s because parents don’t want incredibly graphic books about gender queers, the gay lifestyle, and overt sexuality in the schools
Because it couldn’t possibly be their religion that’s at fault. Therefore the search to find other things, in accord with their doctrines (hedonism, no such thing as human nature, tools are the problem and not the user, etc.), to blame.
call for teacher raises
Yeah, because how much they get paid is the issue. Once again, more spending per pupil* has gone hand-in-hand in most places with declining educational and societal results. But blame the lack of money – because otherwise someone might notice it the Progressivism.
I never thought I’d be a president
And he should have stopped right there. Yeesh.
But it’s not intended to titillate;
This is true. It’s intended to normalize sexuality and hedonistic sexual experience. It’s also intended to break down instinctual awareness of nature and its order, in order to have them believe in the supremacy of the human mind and technology. This is transhumanism, another pillar of Progressivism. No, most of these folks don’t want to diddle your underage kids. They want to break down all the taboos – natural and societal – so your kids can diddle themselves until they’re old enough to find others to diddle. They want them sexually active, even if it’s not with them. (Though there seems to be plenty of that, too.)
Cameron says: “And educators should not need to be armed to feel safe in the classroom.”
But Democrats completely oppose hardening schools to prevent mass shootings and don’t support the right to keep and bear arms. The fantasy land they live in seems nice.
GWB says: The thing is, hardening schools will only somewhat prevent school shootings. The only thing that will really pare them back is a return to Christian morals and actually enforcing them and punishing those who break the rules.
Cameron says: Sorry, I only just saw your response. I agree with your statement but that will take a long time to implement. I think better security measures is something that can be done now while we bring back values and punishment for rule breaking.
11 Comments