Turtler says:

Ah, Reject Sale Roehm. You have learned nothing but forgot much.

“I saw this article posted yesterday and it had one comment. I thought I would come back to it to read the dozens of “anti Kamala” comments but still, just one comment.”

And? Is this going to be some kind of “More Comments = Inherently Better” thing? And you trying to spin the countless comments ripping your bullshit down and casting you out as making you somehow better than VG?

I realize you’re a Fascist and thus do not have a good grasp on capitalism, or history, or much things, but VG makes what benefits it gets from a mixture of ads and donations, meaning that its metric for success is traffic, not so much comments.

“VG’s needs to broaden their audience due to the lack of participation.”

Ah yes, you are so predictable.

‘VG is failing. VG sucks. VG needs to seek a ‘broader, modern audience’ including psychopathic, incompetent, gaslighting ghouls such as myself who will accuse everyone to the right of Bernie Sanders of being a Fascist while I myself regurgitate absolute shit and imitate Ernst Roehm in virtually every aspect except physical courage and intellectual curiosity. And all while I do not have to try and explain why I cling to VG like an absolute barnacle of shit in spite of claiming the site is failing or lacks participation.’

That’s not how any of this fucking works, you absolute idiot.

For a site manager – almost ANY site manager – the prime form of “engagement” that measures their success or lack thereof is Site Traffic. Aka the amount of eyeballs that go onto any given article is the main metric for success, whether financial or getting the word out. Which is why so many sites can be successful (or relatively so) while disabling comments.

That isn’t true for some services (such as Twitter/X) or entertainment, but it is for blogs. And the fact that you do not know this very basic fact (or do know it but wantonly lie about its importance and try to gaslight us expecting us not to know) underlines why your feedback and “contributions” are not so beneficial.

The VG staff have ready access to the site metrics, and if they felt their site was not doing what they wanted to do, they could very readily adjust it, even in closed gardens dominated by left-leaning tech giants like Google. I would know, I’ve worked on site staff.

“Speaking into an echo chamber doesn’t do much to get the message out there.”

This is stupid on its own face. If echo chambers configured in a certain way didn’t get “the message” “out there”, they wouldn’t be used time and again, including by basically everything that has filled what passes for your cranium with absolute horseshit such as the definition of “fascism” you use to smear us and people like Trump with. Because that is what echo chambers DO. They amplify and bounce noise, both physically and metaphorically, so that even a passerby coming close enough stands a chance of hearing.

The main limiting factor preventing this is if the echo chamber is particularly insulated from contact with the wider world, which simultaneously makes it harder to hold up but also makes it more internally focused and less able to directly influence the outside with its echoes. This leads to circle jerks such as nobody in the German Military leadership prior to 1914 being willing to criticize Schliffen’s half-baked, plans for a two front war with Russia and the Western Allies, not even his designated successor Moltke the Younger-and-Lesser. Or how the Soviets believed that war could be simplified into a mathematical formula and they would expect to be consistently on the attack and fighting in other peoples’ territory, not at home. Or how Hillary thought she would win.

This has begun to bite into many of the left’s propaganda echo chambers such as MSNBC, which were meant to broadly influence the public by generating noise and “news” but which have become steadily less trusted by the wider public (even, I note, your fellow leftists) because of their outstanding bias, incompetence, and gaslighting while also running the risk of persuading the left’s leadership that they reflect reality.

In contrast, Victory Girls Blog is not an echo chamber. For starters, it’s not meant to be one, but a small blog connected to a few others but not aimed at mass promotion or “engagement” like Twitter or the likes of Politico. It also allows open discussion and real difference, as shown by your own shit-encrusted, parasitic conduct but also significant debates on things like Russia and Ukraine. You just don’t want to acknowledge that there’s not going to be too much debate about things such as Kamala’s staggering incompetence and moral turpitude, especially among American Conservatives.

“With that said …”

Oh dear. The f**king fascist “genius” who cannot define basic facts or treat those that disagree with them with any kind of sincerity says what?

“The author is correct … should the Malignant Tumor (and his cult members) go after Kamala because of (1) her race, (2) her gender, (3) not having biological children, (4) her personal characteristics like the way she laughs then it will be an uphill slog to elect the pathological lying Malignant Tumor.”

Ah, what absolute bullshit. Haven’t you heard? The pathological lying malignant tumor supposedly won in 2020 with Kamala as his//its Veep.

Firstly: Going after Kamala’s race is one case where I the quintessential anii-racist individualist thinks there is merit, precisely because it would address her own absolute lack of qualifications and the fundamentally racist nullity of left wing identity politics. Kamala is a biracial person with a minority of Black ancestry trying to play African-American, in spite of being descended from slave owners (and indeed benefitting from a political machine designed to gas light and vilify the Party of Lincoln as the Confederacy reborn while seriously floating the immoral and unworkable idea of reparations, while probably only being retained as Presidential Candidate due to the self-consciously racist nonsense from people like Clyburn). How do you figure the Black American Middle Class or even the unfortunates in the Ghettos will react to learning that Kamala and her handlers (like yourself) have been lured into voting for someone who has about as much blood connection to them as and even less cultural connection than the descendants of slaving dynasties from Deepest Louisiana?

Secondly: Kamala is a perfect encapsulation of Toxic Femininity. The kind of woman that most women HATE if they have to actually deal with. She is an egregiously stupid, egregiously egotistical (yes, even moreso than Trump), incompetent diversity hire who Literally Got Her Positions by a mixture of Sleeping Her Way into the Top (just ask Willie Brown) while essentially ripping the soul out of her marriage and family, and being a mixture of a diversity check box and a midwit so unimpressive that even the already unimpressive, baggage laden Biden assumed she would not be able to threaten him under her own steam (and she wasn’t).

This isn’t attacking her for being a woman, this is attacking her for being a waste of space and time that ONLY got her position because she exploited the fact that she was a woman and could claim (however falsely) a racial identity while having a catastrophic lack of merit, credentials, and character. She has less justification to be in her position than Sarah Palin, Tulsi Gabbard, or even the often-criticized Marjorie Taylor-Greene, who I disagree with heavily and who often seems to have an IQ just above Kamala’s but who at least did not get her position on looks or identity bingo.

And what’s more, even if you are too clueless to understand these very basic facts, you can damn well be sure that your masters and idols do. Why else are they working hard to try and 1984 Kamala’s history as “Border Czar” away? Because it was one of the few duties or roles where she had ANY kind of substantial authority or autonomy, and she CATASTROPHICALLY FARQED IT UP. to the point where the Dems are trying to distance themselves from the hordes of illegals crossing over. Because of her.

Her cackle pales in comparison to what makes her both an unlikeable, corrupt harlot and an unfit choice for any office, but it is just another reason people do not like her, and WHEN she does it is even more telling of her lack of character. So might as well point it out.

“(Speaking of “laughing,” have you ever seen the Malignant Tumor crack a smile?”

Are you referring to Biden or Trump? In either case the answer is yes, the fact that you are apparently so fucking stupid and incompetent you have not speaks to which of us actually lives in a Bubble, Ku Klux Kevin. Indeed Trump is something of a Happy Fighter who often smiles, while Biden does less so but still enjoys the attention.

“His negative/dark/apocalyptic view of the future is beyond depressing.)”

there are few better assets than someone who can smile as they see a bleak future. And frankly that’s going to be more important as we careen towards the edge thanks largely to scum like you mishandling everything from Russia to the Recession.

PS: If you think Trump’s view of the future is Negative, Dark, or Apocalyptic, try studying the likes of Mark Steyn, the average border authority in the South, or most Jews. They make Trump look like a Kumbaya singing Optimist. And in some ways, HE IS. He still believes in American and Western Exceptionalism and that there is still more than enough time to right the ship without serious damage. I’m not sure he is right, but it is certainly worth the effort. Certainly moreso than what you and your ilk propose (how many billions to Iran? How much appeasement to Putin or the PRC in the hopes that we can become Frens? How many illegals?).

“The swing voters want to latch on to a reason to support one candidate over the other and those personal issues will not resonate with the vast majority of voters.”

We’ll see, but the economy and immigration are certainly potent reasons to latch onto, and they show Kamala to be a catastrophic failure. They also lead into the other points I raise and you try to deflect on: how she is a fundamentally corrupt, incompetent goon who slept her way to power until she became prominent enough to fall upwards into the cabinet of the most incompetent, brain-dead President to ever exist (and far be it for me to praise Wilson much, but Wilson was smarter even after he was turned into a borderline vegetable by his second term stroke).

And again Reject Sale Roehm, your masters know this even if you do not. There’s a REASON why they are trying to gaslight the swing voters and low info pop about her never having been Border Czar, what SHOULD have been her signal success if it had been so.

Moreover, on some level YOU YOURSELF seem to know she is not worth much. At no point in this entire misbegotten comment of yours have you done ANYTHING to try to Big Kamala up, or claim “Oh no, see, Kamala is secretly a genius and accomplished stateswoman who totally stopped selling her body for patronage and who so awed a malignant, brain dead tumor of a man more prone to habitual racism than his old mentor the former Klan with her brains.”

For all of your sneering and dehumanization* of Trump and deflection about how “hard” it would be to attack Kamala because of her race or gender (as if Trump or we are going to attack her about that for that alone rather than her abuse of those to gain unwarranted power by exploiting the left’s racism and sexism), you make no effort to defend her.

*Oh and don’t think I missed your “clever” bullshit about the man who was nearly assassinated being a malignant tumor, literally not human, and worth only destruction. There’s a reason why dehumanization of one’s domestic enemies is a ways of ramping up to and justifying violence, and is employed by Fascists.

“Some voters will take the bait but not the vast majority of them.”

We’ll see. How would you know?

“It doesn’t help your movement that your party leader has (1) no self control,”

This is blatantly false. Far be it for me to claim that Trump is a Zen Master of Self-Control, but he has shown more than enough self-control. You don’t win a number of high pressure negotiations without that (have you even bothered reading the Art of the Deal? Or studying how he played the Taliban and Putin?).

But it’s telling in comparison to Joe “Clap you dumb bastards”, “We have defeated Medicare” Biden, and Kamala the Banshee, whose lack of self control is far more evident and have required 1984 Style Handlers to rewrite reality. If ANY Conservative President had pulled the “joke” of “Clap you dumb bastards” to serving US Troops, it would be all over the news and you would see a serious push to oust them. And I’d argue rightfully so.

“(2) is sleep deprived so he does a lot of late night raging,”

The fact that you’re a dumb enough little bitch to think this is a major negative when it comes to THE PRESIDENCY, ONE OF THE MOST HABITUALLY SLEEP DEPRIVED, LONG HOURS, HIGH PRESSURE JOBS IN WORLD HISTORY speaks to your lack of awareness.

And at least Trump has the energy to stay up late night doing something, unlike Joe. PS: What do you figure a drug screen would turn up for Biden?

“(3) his late night raging points are insane at best and just downright cruel,”

Even if that were true, it would at worst put him on level with Kamala and the Bidens, both of whom are legendarily awful, scumbag people to deal with personally behind closed doors.

“(4) has a limited vocabulary so constantly hearing the same insults over and over gets old, quickly, ”

This is stupid on a grandiose level. Firstly you moron: EVERYBODY EXCEPT MAYBE AN ALL KNOWING GOD has a limited vocabulary; the only way not to would be to have an UNLIMITED Vocabulary. Secondly: Trump has a far greater off the cuff vocabulary than Kamala or Biden, as you’d notice if you have seen him speaking off the cuff (Which you’ll note he does FAR MORE REGULARLY than either of them do). But on top of that he has the same “Phone a Friend” lifeline of modern politics that they have, in the form of script writers.

Thirdly: The thesaurus is not a riveting communicator. There’s a REASON why most news articles have an average vocabulary around or BELOW Trump, Biden, and Harris, and their script writers probably average even less. Because the average person uses between 2,000-3,000 words in daily life and around 10% (if we’re really generous) of the English language as a whole regularly. And a lot of people are at the effective level of grade schoolers (especially Baltimore College Graduates). So there’s a reason why scriptwriters and news media are paid oobagonza monies in order to write and speak at a grade school level with precious brief exceptions.

But of course, you’re not logically consistent or honest and won’t blame the likes of the New York Times or Morning Joe for having a limited vocabulary. Because you’re an imbecile trying to look profound rather than actually understanding how and why things work (or don’t).

But you have so little contact with reality outside of your echo chambers you view people who have enough situational awareness and knowledge of what you don’t as an echo chamber, and so are dumb enough to think describing your opponent (even in your own strawman fashion) as an angry, energetic, long-hours man is a bad look compared to an angry, vengeful, cruel, low energy, drugged up, racist moppet or a corrupt, cackling, incompetent, harlot harridan.

“(5) didn’t properly vet his VP candidate … ”

Possible, given Pence. We’ll see.

“the train wreck that is JD Vance who brings zero, zilch, nothing to the ticket … not even the possibility of swing state;”

Riight. Because Appalachia and the urban and agrarian blue collar and lower white collar worker as well as former Never Trumpers don’t exist, and aren’t like an emblematic part of Trump’s base or an appeal to a broader coalition or anything.

You farqing incompetent.

I’m still not sure what to make of Vance or how favorable I am to him, but it’s telling you don’t even TRY to ask yourself what he brings, you just go Orange Man Bad, Orange Man Dumb and assert he brings nothing.

PS: Back in the day Ohio was a known swing state.

“Ohio has always been in the Malignant Tumor’s camp,”

But it hasn’t always been in the Republican camp. Moreover, Appalachia and co haven’t always been in Trump’s camp, nor for that matter has Vance. So someone with more mental acuity and basic honesty than you (which excludes Biden and Kamala but includes certain variants of Rutabega) would assume that this is an attempt to break in to the Southeast Seaboard and the Southern Rust Belts, and also as another olive branch to would be Never Trumpers.

Whether or not that’s a genius move or worth it is up for dispute and I’m not sure. But a competent analysist should at least be able to put themselves in the position of their opponent to get a sense of what they are TRYING to do. But a bigoted dumbarse who thinks their opponents are malignant tumors doesn’t need to do that, because malignant tumors don’t think. Which excuses you from having to think of Trump or us as actual people.

(PS: Your Fascism is shown,g Ku Klux Kevin).

“and (6) probably the most important … the Malignant Tumor has drained the pockets of his small donors the past 3.5 years so they’re literally digging in their couch for loose change to send to his dying campaign.”

This is hilarious. Because even if it WERE True, it would point to another weapon Trump could use to bash Biden: A FAILED ECONOMY. You know, the one Biden and his clown show have been asserting would be true.

Moreover, it’s flatly not. Even a cursory look at the donations speaks to that.

“Do you find it interesting that the region in the world that almost always comes out on top as the “happiest country” in the world (Scandinavian countries) all subscribe to six points raised above … gay marriage, trans rights, universal healthcare, free higher education, governmental policies that support views on lessening the impacts of climate change?”

Tell me you don’t understand jackshit about either Trump or the Scandinavian Countries without telling me.

Firstly: Trump is not opposed to trans rights (unless you invent a “trans right” to get into bathrooms, which is something controversial even among trans) or to government largesse. This is one of my caveats with him.

Secondly: Even a cursory look at Scandinavian history and the late medieval shift away from anarchic, individualist, violently egalitarian madhouses that gave us the likes of the Vikings, Sagas of the Icelanders (aka “Farmers come to Blows, taking place in a borderline An-Cap society) turned heavily towards groupthink, harmony-over-happiness, and so on which gave us everything from Gus Adolf’s Caroleans to the Great Reductions to the modern Welfare State. There’s a reason why the self-reporting by Scandinavians as “the happiest people in the world” is not taken seriously by scholars who pointed out that – while by merits Scandinavians are fairly happy but nowhere near the happiest of people, but self-reporting is jacked up to insane levels similar to how it USED to be (emphasis on USED TO) in Japan and South Korea and still is in most Sinosphere countries because of the group imperatives to not humiliate each other with one person’s baggage.

Thirdly: It’s ironic you are trying to dab on this when Scandinavia has taken a turn for the right in multiple avenues, complete with fierce immigration control (outside of Sweden), a resurgence in defense, NATO expansion, and the rise of both Islamists (especially in Sweden) and those opposed to them.

But you probably don’t know jack about that, for the same reason you don’t know a goddamn about Scandinavian History or Culture or why Trump MIGHT try to get Vance onboard.

“100 days … That’s not a lot of time.”

No, it is not. And now Kamala has to try and convince the world and the public she is not what she fundamentally is: a corrupt, classless diversity hire picked to preserve Biden’s sclerotic hold.