For a nanosecond there, I thought she wrote, “PVC is always rape” and I’m thinking…”WHOA…plastic pipe from Home Depot??” Then I saw “PIV” and I thought, “what is that?” then looked it up. It doesn’t mean “Particle Image Velocimetry”
She means good old-fashioned heterosexual, consensual sex. The kind where the penis goes into the vagina. Oh, horrors!
According to “radical wind” it’s rape. Real rape. Consensual sex, according to this penis hating harridan from feminazi hell, is actually degrading, harmful, dangerous, and oppressive.
Her words:
“First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women.” AND “intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women.”
Did you just spit out your coffee just now? I apologize for that. When I read it, I spit out a delicious leftover Christmas gingerbread man. I don’t know if he had a penis.
More from Dr. Penis Hater:
“The vagina’s primary function isn’t to be penetrated by a penis but to eject a baby for birth.”
Uh….eject? Like a cannonball? This is all such fascinating biological news to me.
How long have modern humans been in existence? 200,000 years give or take a Lucy skull or two? And in all those generations, a penis in a vagina was the standard path to a good time. By God’s and nature’s design. Because when it feels good, you do it often, and it results in the general happiness of humans (at least this is what I hear pretty often from Mr. Wilkinson) and most importantly to the species….WE GET ADORABLE BABIES…and the human species flourishes. Duh.
Reading this painfully insane missive over and over and reading the comments at the end has brought me to the conclusion that not only do I need a double bourbon, neat, but the writer and probably most of the women who commented on her post are damaged, hurt, very angry and fearful, and probably abused, with a penis or not, as very young girls or women. That is, of course, very very sad. And this is where radical feminism completely fails the very women they claim to want to free from “oppression”. They cannot continue to blame all their woes, their confused feelings, and the world’s problems on men. Or penises. I want to tell them it’s not men or their nasty penises that keeps them down in a pit of despair but their refusal to be inclusive and accepting of half the world’s population. And their penises. If radical feminists had their way, there be no more penises or men. They are serious about that.
From the comments:
“The best choice we can ever make for our own well being is to reject male ideas and men’s physical presence as much as possible.”
Nice. Let’s see how long humans will last with that kind of thinking.
I was raped many years ago by several men. Kidnapped, tortured and raped. And physically damaged. To the point I couldn’t “eject” babies. At that time in my life I wasn’t thinking about how horrible men were or that I was “oppressed” by male hierarchy. I did think about evil, violence, mayhem and sorrow. I didn’t think penises or men were the problem. I had good strong men in my life that grieved with me and protected me when I felt vulnerable. And I was completely healed and made strong by the love of a man. I don’t hate or fear men. I hate and fear sick and evil people. I am responsible for all outcomes in my life. Feminists want someone to blame for their misery.
Rape is a violent act, no different than someone coming at you with an ax. They’re just using a different weapon of choice. It’s the same with guns. In the hand of a dangerous and evil man, a penis can be a brutal weapon. But otherwise, quite benign and even a lot of fun.
So, I’d like to say to every woman that is reading this, especially if you were a victim of a violent REAL rape, I’m sorry that I burned your eyeballs with that nonsensical piece of radical feminist anti-male/penis crap. This Victory Girl doesn’t like radical feminists that use the word “rape” in such a shameful way and it’s important to understand and see modern feminism for what it is. Which, on a good day, is complete insanity.
And I’d like to say to every male reading this….after 200,000 years, you still have the right idea.
Melanie says: This “all sex is rape” attitude harms women who have dealt with real rape. It is also very sad. These radical feminists have no idea what they’re missing in fun consensual sex.
Jodi says: Excellent post, Catherine. Thanks for sharing your own horrific story, and not being bitter toward the opposite sex. These women have issues that need resolving, but not by bashing men.
It must have been painful to share your story. May you find strength for continued healing.
You are a brave woman, VG. Bless you for your courage to heal rather than condemn. I have always been repelled by feminists. And, years ago you would sometimes hear some men declare themselves feminists (admittedly, in California and mostly Democrat academics) and I would wonder how desperate they must be to have sex in order to join the enemy. Feminists have been very destructive to society. Thankfully, the majority of women rejected them but we have all been influenced to some degree by their hatefulness.
ALman says: A review of “On writing and creativity” on her blog provides all I need to know. I encountered this sort of thinking in colleges and universities, as well as other institutions of “higher learning”. If not known for being “orthodox”, you can very well know that this or a subset of it has infiltrated an educational institution and is tolerated, if not directly supported and encouraged. Both males and females are subjected to this, unless their programs have been minimally impacted. From what I observed, these were becoming fewer and fewer.
If you’re in a mainline Protestant denomination, you can know that there’s a likelihood that they’ve been exposed to some form of this as a “requirement” to meet diversity education. There are those female “pastors” who if not hostile, are indifferent to men. There are male “pastors” who have difficulty in relationships with women and have had them compounded by this sort of “education”. So, if this was an isolated blog, it would be of little consequence, at least to me. Yet, that it is indicative of a more pervasive aspect of our society is troubling, troubling indeed.
Unlike Catherine, who has love, forgiveness, and grace to shape her life, and, thus, is free to live in love, happiness, and joy; none of the persons (male or female) like “witchwind” whom I have encountered can have the same said about them. They are filled with condemnation, anger, and are, generally, joyless. This world can become a “bitter’ place. Again, as Catherine has stated in her own way, only love can keep this from being so. God bless you and yours, Catherine.
Catherine says: Thank you, dear Alman.
Jodi says: Well said, ALman.
Merle says: I’m sorry to hear of the violence directed at you, but GLAD to hear you have recovered. God bless you for not hating all men for the actions of a few.
Merle
“Witchwind’s” blog has no site meter, so we don’t know how much of a following she actually has, but she’s got to be loving the publicity for her stupidity.
Of course, given that the purpose of the vagina is to “eject” a baby — she recognizes that much of a purpose, anyway — does it not have the opposite function as well, of serving as the natural pathway for insemination and conception?
You’ve got to wonder: what does she think of dedicated feminists like Amanda Marcotte, as hard left as you can be, but who has been living with her boyfriend for years and has said, many times, that women have a perfect right to enjoy sex? Clearly, the radical feminist Miss Marcotte seems to think that she has some real choice in the matter of heterosexual intercourse, yet, to read “Witchwind’s” article, it’s clear that she believes that Miss Marcotte is just another dupe of Teh Patriarchy.
There has always been a (sometimes not so) subtle totalitarianism about the left. For “Witchwind,” women cannot even consent to sexual intercourse, because their minds have been so conditioned by us wicked men; all women must be like her, or they are simply not adults capable of choices.
Of course, given that so much heterosexual porn also includes girl-on-girl action, if I were to use “Witchwind’s” logic, I’d have to say that even lesbianism is simply a conditioned tool of Teh Patriarchy, so “Witchwind” has to give up that, too. 🙂
GWB says: Catherine, I am glad to read that you have healed (as much as you ever can) from your ordeal. As a man, it’s hard not to simply feel outrage and begin venting how I would treat such miscreants and so forth. But, that would be part of the “conditioned patriarchy” or some such, so I won’t. *eyeroll*
Yes, these women are the sort of harridans who go on a crusade against the type that hurt them, and define it broadly, indeed. It is sad. And, thank you, Catherine for a post that rebuts it well. God bless.
GWB says: *SIGH* dangit – I could have sworn I checked the close italics tag after the last “is”………………………
lee says: try nature rather than god. more people will listen to you
libby says: Not all sex, she’s saying PIV sex, is male dominated and not enjoyable for the female, and she may be right When I started developing I was interested in rubbing my clit against things, there was no natural desire for PIV but it was presented as the main sexual event and I was coerced by society into accepting it, it was painful and uncomfortable most times and seems only to pleasure the male. She may be very right about this PIV as oppression of women. Did anyone naturally come to desire it other than the male who is far less likely to suffer harm from it than the female? If yes, well then your body your truth, but it would be interesting if none of us are naturally inclined to it.
Consensual sex is the evolution of rape, but most women have Stockholm Syndrome so it’s not really harmful to them.
If sex is rape, then meat is murder. It’s all semantics.
15 Comments