He explained that people misinterpreted his statements, saying that he was talking about all those people murdered by the police were unarmed, and had there been video evidence the barbaric police forces around the nation would have been prosecuted instead of having their crimes brushed under the government rugs. Of course, this is about race, and this is what he had to say about his initial statements.

https://youtu.be/3FPtcl4BXBc

“Well, we were at a rally that was dealing with unarmed people, mostly black and brown, who have been shot and killed, or beaten, or strangled by the police, and I was obviously referring to the people in those type of situations. I was referring to Eric Garner. I was referring to Sam DuBose. I was referring to Antonio [Lopez Guzman]. I was referring to Tamir Rice. That’s what I was referring to.”

He added, “in those cases in particular that we’re talking about, I actually do believe that they were murder. Now, in the case of Walter Scott, who was the man running in the park and was shot in the back, and the case of Sam DuBose, I believe those were murder, and they were deemed murder. And the reason — and the only reason they were deemed murder is because the incidences were caught on video. However, if they had not been caught on video, they — the murderers would have gotten away with their murder. In the case of Eric Garner, and the case of that Tamir Rice, I believe that those were murders, but they were exonerated.”

When asked if about the response to his remarks and the anger and “vitriol” with which it was received, Tarantino did what any good Leftie does: He played the victim. He cloaked himself in the oppressive Constitution, and showed his understanding and knowledge of the Bill of Rights is less than my 3rd grader’s ability to understand our founding documents. He cried that he has rights, and the mean police and conservatives are just out to silence his rights.