It’s bad enough to hear the wails and lamentations from Leftwing women about Elizabeth Warren folding up her Peoples Teepee and retreating to her humble abode for a beer and crab omelets. But we also have to hear from mamas about how this is absolutely crushing the hopes and dreams of their little girls.

I shared the news of @ewarren's exit with my 12 year old daughter tonight. Her response wasn’t of sadness or anger.

It was much worse than that.

A thread. 1/x

— Sherry Pagoto (@DrSherryPagoto) March 6, 2020

The start of a long, self-indulgent attempt at humble-bragging about her woker-than-woke female offspring. Pagoto regales us with sprout’s campaigning for Hillary when she was 8 years old, attending the woke-celeb-driven March For Our Lives at 10 and now, fours years after HRC, mama’s wild expectations for Fauxahontas.

It appears that grooming your child to political theater and publicizing it on social media is the 21st century update of the archetypical stage mother. During those precious few years when children can be just children with worries no greater than completing homework or pushing back on bedtimes, Sprout Pagoto was convinced that Warren is out due to the evil Patriarchy. Rational mamas would have tried to dissuade such emoting by pointing out that Warren lost because Democrat Women took a pass on her. Oh no. It’s time to blame men and inculcate a resentment of males as a class to explain the failure of a lousy candidate with lady bits.

So what can I do now to revive her spirit? At 12, she’s too hardened for the innocent hope generated by pinky promises.

Do I wait 4 years to hatch a new plan to reinvigorate her 16 year old self? What if we’re in hard times again?

What if we need to be SAFE again?

12/x

— Sherry Pagoto (@DrSherryPagoto) March 6, 2020

Mama Pagoto should be looking in the mirror if sprout is too “hardened” at age 12 for pinky promises. Taking her to political marches rather than camping trips or piano recitals or ::::gasp:::: Sunday school not only stripped her of the buffer of childhood innocence while she emotionally matured, but made leftwing politics her identity rather than just an interest. One might think that a clinical psychologist like Sherry Pagoto would know better. :::cough:::cough:::

However, it actually isn’t just about voting lady bits. That is always the fools’ game.

I think what you’re really telling me is that you think Elizabeth Warren is supposed to be the president because she’s a woman and “it’s time.”

I’m telling you that’s ridiculous. Furthermore, it’s the type of hubris that brought down Hillary Clinton. Even more furthermore, it lets female candidates off the hook and absolves them of the responsibility to be good candidates. That is how you get dangerous and unqualified leadership. If we lower the bar based on genitals, we’ll get what we deserve.

Rather, Mama Pagoto, like Hillary and Warren and others of the Left’s subsidiary Feminist Division, don’t actually support Women. They studiously ignore Republican, Libertarian and Conservative women.

I will tell her about…

Jacinda in New Zealand,
Katrín in Iceland,
Sahle-Work in Ethiopia,
Simonetta in Switzerland,
Erna in Norway.

14/x

— Sherry Pagoto (@DrSherryPagoto) March 6, 2020

There have been, and will continue to be, women who rise to the top politically because they appeal to the majority of voters. Failure at the polls is no indication of a grand conspiracy of penises telling vaginas to step aside.

And it’s no excuse for mamas to teach their daughters that there is.

featured image, cropped, Adobe stock, standard license