Kamala Harris Wants a Trump-Style Comeback. So She Built a PAC Called “Fight for the People.”

Kamala Harris Wants a Trump-Style Comeback. So She Built a PAC Called “Fight for the People.”

Kamala Harris Wants a Trump-Style Comeback. So She Built a PAC Called “Fight for the People.”

Kamala Harris has launched a brand-new political action committee called Fight for the People. She presents it as a mission-driven effort to travel, speak out, and elect Democrats. I read the announcement twice. I kept waiting for the part where she acknowledged reality. It never arrived.

That moment sums her up pefectly. Kamala treats politics like a vision board exercise. She stacks slogans together, sprinkles in a nervous laugh, and acts as if every failure proves she’s secretly destined for greatness later. Voters didn’t gradually drift away. They sprinted.

This PAC doesn’t read like leadership. It reads like refusal to accept the verdict. Kamala never persuaded, nor was she inspirational. She didn’t connect. So, of course, the next move is to launch something new, slap the word “fight” on top, and hope everyone forgets what already happened. But the stench of great defeat doesn’t disappear just because the logo looks fresh.

And speaking of fresh ideas, Kamala has been wandering around on that book tour like it’s supposed to prove she’s still a force in national politics. The book didn’t reset anything. I mean, who writes a book about how you lost a presidential bid and then expects applause and purchases? The book didn’t make people think, you know what, maybe we misjudged her. It landed with a thud and a polite shrug.

But in classic Kamala fashion, the lesson wasn’t, maybe this isn’t working. The lesson was, let’s level up the delusion. I can’t win a presidential race or sell a narrative people actually want to read. So of course, the next move is to start a PAC. You just need to slap a heroic title on it and pretend it signals destiny instead of denial. You almost have to admire the commitment.

Then again, when you think about it, I guess it does make sense to start a PAC now since she won’t have access to all that Somali fraud money anymore.

Somewhere along the way, Kamala also decided this makes her part of some grand comeback story. You can almost see the thought bubble – “Trump lost, Trump rebuilt, he came roaring back with millions behind him. I can be unburdened with a new PAC and a podcast tour!”

And if this PAC isn’t about her comeback, if she says it’s about helping other Democrats in other races, well, I am sure those candidates are very nervous. Would you want a loser supporting you? Half the strategists in the party probably started staring at the floor. Endorsements usually come from people who can move votes. Kamala walks onto the stage, and campaigns instantly remember polling graphs they wish they’d never seen.

The former vice president emphasized her intent to remain politically active through the PAC, stating, “I am going to travel, speak out, and help elect Democrats everywhere and I cannot do this alone.” She noted the importance of meeting early fundraising goals: “Donations are going to be critical. Especially before our first FEC fundraising deadline ends in a few days and we’re legally required to report what we’ve raised. Everyone will be watching, and I hope to file a big report.”

The text concludes with a fundraising link and an appeal to supporters: “Knowing you are still with me in this fight means a lot. – Kamala” – Breitbart.com

If I were running in a tight race, I’d thank her politely and pray she supported someone else. Losing has gravity, it clings. No one wants to share it. The phrase Fight for the People feels less like mission and more like a warning tape.

Real leaders hit walls and change direction. They learn and adapt. The verdict is usually accepted. But when it comes to Kamala, she doubles down. She actually tries to tell us that history just hasn’t caught up to her yet.

I’ve got news for Kamala, history has arrived, looked around, and gently suggested she try another line of work.

There are options. She would do fine as a motivational speaker. No one asking tough questions, built-in applause, and plenty of opportunity for her word salads. Corporate retreats eat that stuff up. Everyone leaves with a reusable water bottle and a slogan.

Hear me out, but a podcast would work for her too. She can talk about confidence and relationships. Her talk about being unburdened by what has been would make sixty minutes go by before you could realize she was just background noise. Nothing specific ever gets said. It fits.

She and Marjorie Taylor Greene could start a new daytime television show. Sit on a couch, nod thoughtfully, and offer empathy in soft tones. The studio audience claps on cue and goes home feeling like they witnessed wisdom. A book club tie-in would seal the deal.

What Kamala shouldn’t be doing is circling back towards the White House. We watched that movie already. No one is begging for an encore.

If Kamala Harris truly thinks this PAC is the opening chapter of her grand return, then Lord help us. Not because she’s unstoppable. Because she refuses to stop pretending. It’ll make for some good and easy blogging, though, so I’ve got that going for me, which is good.

Do you have any job ideas for her? The comment section is open. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year ya filthy animals!

Feature Image: Kamala Harris/Gage Skidmore/Flckr/License Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic/background edited in Canva Pro

Written by

Delivering blunt conservative takes on politics and pop culture—guiding the next generation with wit, wisdom, and straight truth. Reviving patriotism.

4 Comments
  • Wfjag says:

    Kamala: When Trump said “Fight” it inspired people. Why won’t it work just as well for me?

    Highly paid political advisor: Trump was shot in the head, got up showing a bloody face and raised a bloody fist as he shouted “Fight! Fight! Fight!” It was a very real moment that connected with people. Maybe if we got some Bernie Bro to shoot you in the head first, shouting “Fight” might be convincing.

  • Scott says:

    Job ideas for her? She could go back to where she started with Willie Brown…She apparently had some skills in that realm..

  • Tregonsee314 says:

    Either she has NO political sense (highly likely), or someone is using her to graft from the PAC “she” is creating (also highly likely and not mutually exclusive to the first thought). Having burned through large quantities of money without result in her campaign, she is anathema to the Democrat Donor base. If she had the brains of a zabriskan fontema (cf https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/158031/why-did-everyone-who-had-ever-seen-them-agree-that-zabriskan-fontemas-were-the-s ) she’d walk away and enjoy her lifetime pensions and perks for Senator and Vice-Preident and mooch as a speaker at 50k a pop. But alas, she makes Fontema look like brain surgeons or rocket scientists. As I said, she is anathema to the donor class, so this will go nowhere fast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead