Impeachment 2.0 Is One Arrow In Dem Quiver

Impeachment 2.0 Is One Arrow In Dem Quiver

Impeachment 2.0 Is One Arrow In Dem Quiver

In an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi didn’t rule out Impeachment 2.0 of President Donald Trump in an attempt to stop him from nominating a Justice to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States. Pelosi stated that there are many arrows in her quiver.

First of all, personal point of privilege, Nancy Pelosi has got to be the evil spawn of Beelzebub. Marie Antoinette Pelosi Beelzebub. The woman is utterly disdainful of anyone who doesn’t have something she can barter with (their souls) and the polite rules of society (flaunting her subzero and fresh blowout). Definitely spawn of some poor devil.

Speaker Pelosi was asked by George Stephanopoulos if she would begin Impeachment 2.0 proceedings against Donald Trump (and AG Bill Barr) to delay the confirmation hearings for his SCOTUS pick. Her answer:

“Well, we have our options,” she said on ABC’s “This Week,” replying to host George Stephanopoulos’ question about whether the House would consider launching impeachment proceedings to block the confirmation of a Trump Supreme Court nomination.

“We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now, but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country. The president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election with statements that he and his henchmen have made.”

Well, there is a lot of telling words in that statement. Let’s watch her say those words in the video:

Here at Victory Girls, we don’t generally go after someone on their appearance, but Nancy, Joan Crawford contacted me through the spirit world and wants her eyebrows back.

Impeachment 2.0 is in her quiver? Impeached for what? For being Orange Man Bad, just like last time. The President has not threatened to ignore the results of the election. What Trump said in his interview with Chris Wallace was:

“I have to see,” Trump said of accepting the result in November. “I have to see. No, I’m not going to just say yes. I’m not going to say no, and I didn’t last time either.”

Any leader who said anything different would be irresponsible.

In Nancy’s parlance, Trump doesn’t have colleagues or associates, he has “henchmen”. Pot meet kettle. Nancy shaped her $5,000 gold Impeachment pens to looks like bullets. Now, she talks about her quiver full of arrows. Nancy is going to war against the American people and wrapping her weapons in the shredded Constitution. While the House has no role in the confirmation process, Nancy said:

The House plays no part in the confirmation process but could, in theory, take other actions that clog up the Senate calendar.

“We have a responsibility,” Pelosi added. “We’ve taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people. When we weigh the equities of protecting our democracy, that requires us to use every arrow in our quiver.”

The fact that she alluded to weaponry twice was no mistake. It is a deliberate threat of violence to the citizens of the United States and The Constitution.

And, here is one more other little note to Nancy: Although she discusses at length President Trump’s failures in the Covid-19 epidemic, Nancy is to busy plotting her coup with Impeachment 2.0 to take up Coronavirus relief. Yeah. Priorities. It’s awful for the people who need the help, but since the Country is broke, it’s helpful for the taxpayer in general.

Written by

2 Comments
  • GWB says:

    in a lame duck session
    Well, no, Stephy, it isn’t a lame duck until after the election and Trump loses (legally).

    Impeached for what?
    No, not even for ORANGEMANBAD. She wants to use IMPEACHMENT AS A DELAYING TACTIC. That’s gotta violate something somewhere.

    could, in theory, take other actions that clog up the Senate calendar
    Honey, that wouldn’t be protecting the Constitution, it would be shredding your oath to it.

    We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people.
    NO. You have a responsibility TO THE CONSTITUTION.

    the equities of protecting our democracy
    And that word salad means you’re trying to put one over on us.

    she discusses at length
    Sorry, neither. She lobbed a few assertions in less than 20 seconds. She neither “discussed” nor spoke “at length.” (10 quatloos to the first person that identifies the reference for that first sentence.)

  • Toastrider says:

    Oh please, PLEASE push out another turd of an impeachment, you stupid botox-raddled hag.

    You couldn’t deliver the last time, and this time you don’t even have the cover of ‘RUSSIANS!’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead
Instagram
Instagram did not return a 200.