Ilhan Omar Doesn’t Under Our Republic Or Freedom

Ilhan Omar Doesn’t Under Our Republic Or Freedom

Ilhan Omar Doesn’t Under Our Republic Or Freedom

Cheerio Chickadees. We haven’t cracked on Ilhan Omar in a while so let us at it. Sad, benighted Ilhan always is in a snit about something. Meltdowns and tantrums are her natural state. Right now, she is cornfused that some people did something are glad that the corruption at the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is being exposed and shut down. Poor girl. Too sad.

It’s hard to believe that Omar was only elected to the U.S. House from Somalia Minnesota in 2019. Seems like she has been around spouting her hateful Israel and Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions rhetoric since our Republic was founded. She only opens her mouth for foul filth to escape. Ilhan is in a snit fit because the USAID/BHA spigot has been slowed to a trickle. BHA is the Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance, a part of the USAID. You can see why so much money was funneled/laundered through that many headed monster. Somalia is one of the top countries receiving funding per Axios:

The big picture: In the 2023 fiscal year, USAID disbursed roughly $44 billion of aid across 160 countries and regions around the world, per the agency’s foreign assistance dashboard.

Ukraine was the top recipient of foreign assistance funds in FY 2023, with over $16 billion issued. Israel received more than $2.2 billion in disbursements, while Ethiopia and Jordan each received over $1 billion.
Other top recipients also included Somalia, Afghanistan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Omar has been a favorite target of those of us on the Right because she is dismissive of American values and our Constitution. She did mention the Constitution yesterday, as a matter of fact. The Democrats had a public meltdown about USAID:

Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) sparked controversy today with a dramatic social media post accusing former President Donald Trump of attempting to establish a dictatorship and warning of a “constitutional crisis.”

Omar’s comments, which come amid heightened political tensions, were quickly dismissed by conservatives as hyperbolic and politically motivated, especially in light of recent revelations about wasteful spending at the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

“We are witnessing a constitutional crisis,” Omar declared. “We talked about Trump wanting to be a dictator on day one, and here we are. This is what the beginning of dictatorship looks like—when you take the Constitution and install yourself as the sole power. That is how dictators are made.”

The condescension and disdain in her voice annoys me:

So she was provided for by USAID while in the refugee camps? Great! Why did we ever let her family in?

Ilhan Omar does not like our police force and says that when people abroad interact with our military they don’t feel good about the U.S.. When they interact with USAID they do feel good. From the Tampa Free Press, let’s see how good we make them feel:

Omar’s remarks followed a bombshell report exposing decades of mismanagement and questionable spending at USAID, including funding for projects like a transgender opera in Colombia, a “DEI musical” in Ireland, and irrigation canals in Afghanistan that inadvertently supported poppy cultivation for the Taliban.

The report also revealed that USAID funds had indirectly benefited designated terrorist organizations and controversial entities, such as EcoHealth Alliance, the group linked to controversial research at the Wuhan lab

Yes, Omar, Congress does have the power of the purse, but they have been very poor stewards of the taxpayers’ hard earned money. This is what led us to elect Donald Trump who told us quite often that he would bring in Elon Musk for DOGE. If you had not allowed the grift to go on, this would not be happening.

Finally, we have never heard of a Dictator making government smaller.

Featured Composite: Wikimedia Commons.org/cropped/Public Domain/Public domain This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author’s life plus 70 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons.org/cropped/Creative Commons

Written by

5 Comments
  • Cameron says:

    Did her brotherhusband give her permission to speak?

  • draigh says:

    “Ilhan Omar Doesn’t Under Our Republic Or Freedom.” This should surprise no one. The only reason she is in Congress is because of the overwhelming Somali vote in her district. Ask her what the 5th Amendment is and make certain she doesn’t have an earbud in her ear. Give her a minute.

    • Scott says:

      One more reason that we need to only be allowing those that make our nation stronger to immigrate. Importing third world peasants with room temp IQ’s and no interest in integrating into our society or values is just a slow suicide.

  • Hate_me says:

    If you girls need an editor, I’m available.

    That title seems like it needs a grammar nazi, and I could have edited Hitler’s speeches.

  • GWB says:

    What is up with the headline? You left half a word off.
    Also, what is up with that huge licensing wall-o-text at the end?

    because she is dismissive of American values and our Constitution
    That, and that she lied to get into this country and to get her brother in. She shouldn’t even be a citizen, much less a Congressperson.

    when you take the Constitution and install yourself as the sole power
    They lie about the Constitution the same way they lie when using the word “democracy.” They all do it.
    But she is a particularly ugly liar, given her violation of her oath to said Constitution (as a “citizen” and asa Congressperson).

    Why did we ever let her family in?
    For the same reason we let all the illegal aliens in.

    when people abroad interact with our military they don’t feel good about the U.S.
    I would generally hope not. At least if they’re bad guys (and vast swaths of the folks in Somalia are bad guys – and a bunch of them in the US, too) – we’re there to hurt them and break their toys. I want them crying in their tofu every night when our military is there.

    When they interact with USAID they do feel good.
    Duh. USAID is on their side. As in, on the bad guys’ side.

    a transgender opera in Colombia
    Hey, not a dime of that money went to the transgender opera. That was paid for directly by Dept of State.
    Which then leads to the question, “So what DID that money pay for, and why is it wrongly labeled in our books? That’s a felony, you know.”

    inadvertently supported poppy cultivation for the Taliban
    Ummm, NO. They did not do anything “inadvertently.”

    Congress does have the power of the purse
    Yes, and no. Congress has the power to appropriate funds. They also generally have the power to direct where those funds can be spent. But you can’t stomp your feet about that second bit and then not take total responsibility for each and every expenditure of USAID. Either you directed those moneys to be spent as they were spent (in which case a lot of you need to be in prison), or you left some discretion to the Executive. If you left the discretion to the Executive… well, he’s exercising that discretion. And the courts have said the Executive enjoys complete discretion within the boundaries Congress sets for spending those monies.

    (Also, no way in hell you can start talking about the Executive exercising too much power when you pass omnibus appropriations bills that are 11,000 pages long. Every single agency established by Congress in law should have its own spending bill, with explicit line items in it.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead