Previous post
“The obsession with ‘limited war’ began during the Cold War. The fear of nuclear annihilation (often overstated for propaganda purposes) led to a series of proxy wars across Africa, South America and Southeast Asia in lieu of a direct confrontation with the Communist Bloc. Due to the fears of those in power, and the even less informed fears of many of their constituents, the goals of war, most evidently in Vietnam, began to change from victory to… something else. Murky, limited, and ultimately indecisive objectives have been cited, ultimately boiling down to a stalemate at best, defeat at worst.
Commanders are not making battlefield decisions based on combat necessity; they are making them based on the instructions of lawyers who endeavor to make war more ‘humane.’
War is, by its very nature, inhumane. War is violence, death and horror. It is serious business. Unfortunately, we have not engaged in it seriously for a very long time, and the costs of that fact have been largely glossed over.”
from The Cost of Limited War, by Peter Nealen, former USMC Force Recon, and a contributing editor for SOFREP
Little did Chris Stevens know that when he wrote that, how prophetic and tragic it would be – not only for himself and three other Americans left to die by a State Department and President, but for all Americans….as we face an increasingly hostile enemy that is quickly losing all fear of a country governed and led by by Beltway cowards and people that have zero experience in real global understanding and leadership, let alone any inclination for confronting evil and defeating it. Remind me again of Hillary Clinton’s experience with war. Or global conflict. Remind me again of Obama’s obsession with placating Islamic extremists.
Please take the time to read the diary released today and the analysis by Mr. Murphy and Mr. Webb. It is far more important than any other rainbow colored diversions that’s taken place this week.
I remember debating the naivety of Obama’s belief (and intention) that reaching out and having ‘respectful’ conversations with our adversaries would create a political atmosphere whereby common ground would be found and conflict resolved- because, after all, if the world just didn’t think we were such bullies then they would invite us to share their bucket and shovel while playing in the sandbox and we would be able to show them how to build a really great castle and they would think we were just swell and invite us in for popsicles and a sleepover! Too bad most people drank that kool aid, cause the kids in the sandbox are are burying our asses.
2 Comments